Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Taking the Nation Out of Alienation: Dandamudi v. Tisch Affirms that Nonimmigrant Aliens are Entitled to Suspect Class Protection Cover

Taking the Nation Out of Alienation: Dandamudi v. Tisch Affirms that Nonimmigrant Aliens are Entitled to Suspect Class Protection

By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2013

Abstract

On July 10, 2012, in Dandamudi v. Tisch, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit struck down New York Education Law section 6805(1)(6), reasoning that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The law explicitly denied legal, nonimmigrant aliens the ability to apply for a license to practice as a pharmacist in New York. The Second Circuit’s decision diverged from those of other circuits that have held similar laws targeting nonimmigrant aliens to be constitutional. This Comment argues that the Second Circuit’s decision in Dandamudi faithfully comports with Supreme Court Equal Protection Clause precedent. Further, it asserts that the Dandamudi court’s ruling is a much-needed affirmation of nonimmigrant aliens’ right to work and contribute productively to American society.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 128
Published on: Apr 10, 2013
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2013 Joshua Neifeld, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.