Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Reasoning Behind a “Good Reason” Standard: The Seventh Circuit’s Analysis of Successor Liability in Teed v. Thomas & Betts Power Solutions, L.L.C. Cover

The Reasoning Behind a “Good Reason” Standard: The Seventh Circuit’s Analysis of Successor Liability in Teed v. Thomas & Betts Power Solutions, L.L.C.

By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2014

Abstract

On January 9, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held in Teed v. Thomas & Betts Power Solutions, L.L.C. that a federal common law standard for successor liability applies to claims arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act. In doing so, the court established a new, broader standard for successor liability that applies to any claim arising from an employer’s violation of a federal labor or employment statute. This Comment argues that, although the court properly recognized congressional policies favoring employee protection, the new standard goes too far in liberalizing the successor liability exception. With little to guide the newly articulated standard, the Seventh Circuit cannot anticipate problems that might arise in deciding future cases.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 169 - 182
Published on: Apr 9, 2014
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2014 James Long, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.