Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Check Fraud and the Variation of Section 4-401: Why Banks Should Not Be Able to Vary the Ucc’s Standard Risk Allocation Scheme Cover

Check Fraud and the Variation of Section 4-401: Why Banks Should Not Be Able to Vary the Ucc’s Standard Risk Allocation Scheme

By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2013

Abstract

Uniform Commercial Code Article 4 governs both a bank’s duties in collecting checks for payment as well as its duties to its depositors. Section 4-401 provides that a bank can charge an item to a customer’s account only if it is properly payable. For an item to be properly payable, it must be authorized by the customer. This Note examines the 2010 case, Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Wachovia Bank, in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota stated that a bank can vary section 4-401’s default rule by including negotiated provisions in the deposit agreement. After exploring the structure and history of Article 4, this Note argues that banks should not be able to vary section 4-401’s default rule, and proposes that courts take into account the history of Article 4 when analyzing which default rules banks can vary through deposit provisions.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 275 - 312
Published on: Jan 30, 2013
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2013 Michael Coutu, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.