Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Return Fire: An En Banc Hearing in Wollschlaeger V. Governor Of Florida is Necessary to Protect the First Amendment Rights of Physicians Cover

Return Fire: An En Banc Hearing in Wollschlaeger V. Governor Of Florida is Necessary to Protect the First Amendment Rights of Physicians

Open Access
|May 2015

Abstract

In 2014, in Wollschlaeger v. Governor of Florida, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a Florida ban on physician speech about firearm ownership was a valid regulation of professional conduct. The court reasoned that because the speech took place within the physician-patient relationship it should be treated as professional conduct that may be regulated by the state and not subject to First Amendment scrutiny. This Comment argues that the Eleventh Circuit mischaracterized the speech as conduct and that an en banc hearing should be granted to reverse this decision to avoid a negative impact on physicians’ First Amendment rights.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 123 - 137
Published on: May 13, 2015
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2015 Erika Manderscheid, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.