Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Jurisdictional Haze: Indiana and Washington’s Unconstitutional Extensions of the Postmortem Right of Publicity Cover

Jurisdictional Haze: Indiana and Washington’s Unconstitutional Extensions of the Postmortem Right of Publicity

By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2016

Abstract

Long after they die, cultural icons such as Elvis Presley, Marilyn Monroe, and Jimi Hendrix continue to earn millions of dollars annually. Despite the tremendous amount of money earned by marketing the images of certain late celebrities, the laws conferring and governing the postmortem right of publicity are varied and often unpredictable. In most states, the right to profit from the image of a deceased person depends entirely upon the law of the jurisdiction in which the deceased was domiciled at the time of death. Certain state legislatures, however, have passed statutes conferring this right on persons domiciled outside of their respective borders, and these statutes may have potentially dramatic effects on businesses marketing products incorporating the images of celebrities. This Note argues that statutes of this nature are unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause, the Full Faith and Credit Clause, and the dormant Commerce Clause, and that the postmortem right of publicity should be governed in all states by the law of the jurisdiction in which the deceased was domiciled at the time of death.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 297 - 336
Published on: Jan 28, 2016
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Robert Rossi, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.