Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Court-Side Seats? The Communications Decency Act and the Potential Threat to Stubhub and Peer-to-Peer Marketplaces Cover

Court-Side Seats? The Communications Decency Act and the Potential Threat to Stubhub and Peer-to-Peer Marketplaces

Open Access
|Jan 2016

Abstract

In 1996, Congress passed section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides broad immunity to websites from vicarious liability for the content produced by its users. Despite this broad immunity, a website will be liable for its user’s content when it is deemed to be an “information content provider” itself. In 2008, in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a website is an information content provider and thus loses immunity when it “materially contributes to the alleged unlawfulness” of the content. Although most courts have followed this “material contribution test,” the test has lead to diverging opinions as to immunity for peer-to-peer marketplace websites, such as StubHub. This Note proposes a new test in line with Congress’s intent to provide broad immunity under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 227 - 260
Published on: Jan 28, 2016
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Matthew Feuerman, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.