
On the Road to Recovery: Providing Generic Drug Consumers with a Remedy in Failure-to-Warn Cases
By: Katelyn Bradley
Abstract
On March 16, 2018, in Rafferty v. Merck & Co., the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that brand-name drug manufacturers owe generic drug users a duty to not act recklessly in creating and updating warning labels. Courts deciding this issue have disagreed about whether and to what extent a duty should be imposed on brand-name manufacturers concerning injuries caused by generic products they do not produce. The Supreme Judicial Court is among the minority of courts that has correctly imposed a duty on brand-name manufacturers in this context. Its imposition of a recklessness standard, however, is incorrect because it inappropriately weighs public policy concerns.
Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 2165 - 2181
Published on: Jul 29, 2024
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Katelyn Bradley, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.