Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
So Much to Comment on, So Little Time: Notice-and-Comment Requirements in Agency Informal Rulemaking Under the Administrative Procedure Act Cover

So Much to Comment on, So Little Time: Notice-and-Comment Requirements in Agency Informal Rulemaking Under the Administrative Procedure Act

By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2020

Abstract

On February 1, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided National Lifeline Ass’n v. FCC. In National Lifeline Ass’n, the D.C. Circuit Court held that, by adopting changes to a tribal telecommunications subsidy that contradicted prior policy rationale after only a two-week comment period, the agency both: (1) acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, and (2) violated procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). National Lifeline Ass’n represented a matter of first impression among the federal circuit courts and established a minimum comment period of thirty days for informal agency rulemaking. This Comment argues that the D.C. Circuit Court’s substantive holding aligned with prior case law, but that the procedural holding was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council and the spirit of the APA.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Published on: Apr 2, 2020
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Kadie Martin, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.