Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A (Solicited) Call for Clarity: The Definition of Automatic Telephone Dialing System After Gadelhak Cover

A (Solicited) Call for Clarity: The Definition of Automatic Telephone Dialing System After Gadelhak

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Abstract

In 2020, in Gadelhak v. AT&T Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld the Northern District of Illinois’s ruling that a tool that sends text message surveys to consumers was not an automatic telephone dialing system under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991. The Seventh Circuit reached this decision by rendering a different interpretation for the statutory definition of an automatic dialer than the district court. Gadelhak widened an already substantial circuit court split regarding what technologies the Act covers. This Comment evaluates the strengths and shortcomings of the Seventh Circuit’s narrow interpretation of the statutory definition of an automatic telephone dialing system. It also discusses the potential impact of the Ninth Circuit’s 2019 case, Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, which explores the same issue, as the Supreme Court of the United States prepares to decide it.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Published on: Mar 12, 2021
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Scott J. Sheltra, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.