Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Judicial Illumination of the Constitutional "Twilight Zone": Protecting Post-Arrest, Pretrial Suspects from Excessive Force at the Hands of Law Enforcement Cover

Judicial Illumination of the Constitutional "Twilight Zone": Protecting Post-Arrest, Pretrial Suspects from Excessive Force at the Hands of Law Enforcement

By:   
Open Access
|Jul 2003

Abstract

Police brutality is one of the most serious and enduring human rights violations in the United States today. One means by which victims may seek redress is under 42 U.S.C. 1983, which provides a civil cause of action against state actors who deprive individuals of their constitutional rights. This Note examines 1983 litigation brought by post-arrest, pretrial detainees alleging the use of excessive force by law enforcement officials. There is currently a circuit split regarding whether such claims must be brought under the Fourth Amendment’s proscription of unreasonable seizures of the person or the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee that no State will deprive a citizen of liberty without due process of law. This issue’s resolution has significance as to the plaintiffs burden of proof, and thus, his or her likelihood of attaining a favorable verdict. This Note contends that the best approach is a hybrid model that involves a synthesis of both Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment standards because it is both practical and mindful of recent lines of U.S. Supreme Court precedent.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 1357 - 1395
Published on: Jul 1, 2003
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2003 Eamonn O'Hagan, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.