
Opining on Death: Witness Sentence Recommendations in Capital Trials
By: Wayne A. Logan
Open Access
|May 2000Abstract
Despite the Supreme Court’s command that capital prosecutions be free of undue arbitrary and capricious influences, the trials themselves are becoming increasingly emotional and personalized. This Article addresses a key outgrowth of this evolution: the increasingly common practice of witnesses opining on whether a defendant should be put to death, despite the Court’s apparent prohibition of such testimony. The Article addresses why this practice is likely to continue, and advances several reasons why the Supreme Court should impose an unequivocal bar on sentence opinion, testimony in capital trials.
Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 517 - 547
Published on: May 1, 2000
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2000 Wayne A. Logan, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.