Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Brum v Town of Dartmouth and the Public Duty Rule: Navigating an Interpretive Quagmire Cover

Brum v Town of Dartmouth and the Public Duty Rule: Navigating an Interpretive Quagmire

By:   
Open Access
|Mar 2000

Abstract

In 1993, a group of youths entered the Dartmouth High School and stabbed sixteen-year old Jason Robinson to death in his social studies classroom. In 1999, in Brum v. Town of Dartmouth, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that the town was immune from suit pursuant to Massachusetts’ statutory “public duty rule,” which insulates public employers from liability where the employer does not “originally cause” the harm. This Article traces the evolution of public tort liability in Massachusetts, suggests a three-part framework for interpreting Massachusetts’ public duty rule and proposes a narrowly-tailored exception to the rule in cases like Brunt.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 383 - 463
Published on: Mar 1, 2000
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2000 Kevin M. Barry, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.