Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Domain Name Dispute Resolution in U.S. Courts: Should ICANN be Given Deference? Cover

Domain Name Dispute Resolution in U.S. Courts: Should ICANN be Given Deference?

Open Access
|Sep 2002

Abstract

Established in 1998, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a private, non-profit corporation that administers the Internet domain name system. Through its Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), ICANN has also become an important vehicle for resolving domain name disputes that result from “cybersquatting.” The UDRP requires that parties to a domain name dispute submit to arbitration that conforms to ICANN rules. Although the parties maintain the right to seek judicial review of UDRP decisions, however, the level of deference that courts should grant those decisions remains unclear. To address this issue, this Note reviews the technological and legal history of the domain name system. This Note also examines ICANN’s origins, purposes, and structure, comparing them to those of federal administrative agencies. In doing so, this Note concludes that courts reviewing UDRP decisions should grant ICANN the same deference granted to federal agencies.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 1177 - 1201
Published on: Sep 1, 2002
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2002 Katherine Meyers, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.