References
- 1. Di Carlo A. Human and economic burden of stroke. Age Aging. 2009; 38:4-5.
- 2. Musicco M, Emberti L, Nappi G, Italian Multicenter Study on Outcomes of Rehabilitation of Neurological Patients. Early and long-term outcome of rehabilitation in stroke patients: the role of patient characteristics, time of initiation and duration of interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84:551-8.10.1053/apmr.2003.50084
- 3. Shah M. Rehabilitation of the older adult with stroke. Clin Geriatr Med. 2006; 22:469-89.10.1016/j.cger.2005.12.012
- 4. Aprile I, Di Stasio E, Romitelli F, Lancellotti S, Caliandro P, Tonali P, et al. Effects of rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with chronic stroke. Brain Inj. 2008; 22:451-6.10.1080/02699050802060639
- 5. Salter K, Jutai J, Hartley M, Foley N, Bhogal S, Bayona N, et al. Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2006; 38:113-7.10.1080/16501970500314350
- 6. Adams HP, Jr., del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke. 2007; 38:1655-711.
- 7. Lindsay MP, Gubitz G, Bayley M, Hill MD, Davies- Schinkel C, Singh S, et al. Canadian Stroke Strategy. Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care. Update 2010. [cited 2012 October 13]; Available from: http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2010BPR_ENG.pdf.
- 8. Cifu DX, Stewart DG. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80 (5 Suppl 1):S35-9.
- 9. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke. 1997; 28: 1550-6.10.1161/01.STR.28.8.1550
- 10. Ploypetch T, Dajpratham P. Change in quality of life of disabled patients after intensive inpatient rehabilitation at Siriraj Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011; 94:1245-51.
- 11. Horn SD, DeJong G, Smout RJ, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86 (12 Suppl 2): S101-14.10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.016
- 12. Spilker B, editor. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconoics in Clinical Trials. New York: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.
- 13. Hackett ML, Duncan JR, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Bonita R. Health-related quality of life among longterm survivors of stroke: results form the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992. Stroke. 2000; 31:440-7.
- 14. Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, Gilligan AK, Thrift A. Determinants of handicap after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2004; 35:715-20.10.1161/01.STR.0000117573.19022.66
- 15. Hopman WM, J V. Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2003; 34:801-5.10.1161/01.STR.0000057978.15397.6F
- 16. Mackenzie AE, AM C. Predictors of quality of life following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2002; 24:259-65.10.1080/09638380110081805
- 17. Mahatnirundkul S, Tantipiwattanasakul W, Poompaisalchai W, Wongsuwan K, R P. Comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF (26 items). J Mental Health Thai. 1998; 5:4-15.
- 18. WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic version of the assessment. [cited 2014 February 17]; Available from: www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/76.pdf.
- 19. Wade DT, Collins C. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Study. 1988; 10:64-7.
- 20. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Morelli D, Troisi E, Coiro P, et al. Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81:695-700.10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90095-9
- 21. Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther. 1966; 46:357-75.
- 22. Nilchaikovit T, Lortrakul M, U P. Development of Thai version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in cancer patients. J Psychiatr Assoc Thai. 1996; 41: 18-30.
- 23. Sivenius J, Pyorala K, Heinonen OP, Salonen JT, Riekkinen P. The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke-a controlled trial. Stroke. 1985; 16:928-31.10.1161/01.STR.16.6.928
- 24. Wood-Dauphinee S, Shapiro S, Bass E, Fletcher C, Georges P, Hensby V, et al. A randomized trial of team care following stroke. Stroke. 1984; 15:864-72.10.1161/01.STR.15.5.864
- 25. Indredavik B, Bakke F, Slordahl SA, Rokseth R, Haheim LL. Stroke unit treatment improves long-term quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1998; 29:895-9.10.1161/01.STR.29.5.895
- 26. Maulden SA, Gassaway J, Horn SD, Smout RJ, DeJong G. Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86 (Suppl 2): S34-S40.
- 27. Carod-Artal FJ, Egido J. Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009; 27:204-14.10.1159/000200461
- 28. Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S, Reker D, Lai SM, Richards L. Daily functioning and quality of life in a randomized controlled trial of therapeutic exercise for subacute stroke survivors. Stroke. 2005; 36:1764-70.10.1161/01.STR.0000174192.87887.70
- 29. Ancheta J, Husband M, Law D, Reding M. Initial functional independence measure score and interval post stroke help assess outcome, length of hospitalization, and quality of care. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000; 14:127-34.
- 30. Kauhanen M-L. Quality of life after stroke: clinical, functional, psychosocial and cognitive correlates [Dissertation]. 1999 [cited 2014 February 17]; Available from: http://www.herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514254279/isbn9514254279.pdf.