References
- 1Allain, P. (2013). La prise de décision: Aspects théoriques, neuro-anatomie et évaluation [Decision-making: Theoretical aspects, neuroanatomy, and assessment]. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 5(2), 6981. DOI: 10.3917/rne.052.0069
- 2Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2018). Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1506.04967v2.
- 3Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- 4Christensen, J. F., & Gomila, A. (2012). Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1249–1264. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.008
- 5Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108(2), 353380. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006
- 6Cushman, F. (2015). Deconstructing intent to reconstruct morality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 97103. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.06.003
- 7Cushman, F., & Mele, A. (2008).
Intentional action: Two-and-a-half folk concepts? In J. Knobe & S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental philosophy (pp. 171–188). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100350 - 8Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2011). Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 10521075. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167.x
- 9FeldmanHall, O., Mobbs, D., Evans, D., Hiscox, L., Navrady, L., & Dalgleish, T. (2012). What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition, 123(3), 434441. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001
- 10Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 226241. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.226
- 11Freeman, J. B., Dale, R., & Farmer, T. A. (2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059
- 12Gold, N., Pulford, B. D., & Colman, A. M. (2015). Do as I say, don’t do as I do: Differences in moral judgments do not translate into differences in decisions in real-life trolley problems. Journal of Economic Psychology, 47, 5061. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.01.001
- 13Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 21052108. DOI: 10.1126/science.1062872
- 14Hehman, E., Stolier, R. M., & Freeman, J. B. (2015). Advanced mouse-tracking analytic techniques for enhancing psychological science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(3), 384401. DOI: 10.1177/1368430214538325
- 15Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. DOI: 10.1037/10628-000
- 16Hirschfeld-Kroen, J., Jiang, K., Wasserman, E., Anzellotti, S., & Young, L. (2021). When my wrongs are worse than yours: Behavioral and neural asymmetries in first-person and third-person perspectives of accidental harms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 94, 104–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104102
- 17Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 5469. DOI: 10.1037/a0028347
- 18Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Experiments with more than one random factor: Designs, analytic models, and statistical power. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 601–625. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702
- 19Kahane, G. (2012). On the wrong track: Process and content in moral psychology. Mind & Language, 27(5), 519545. DOI: 10.1111/mila.12001
- 20Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.
- 21Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years 10 to 16 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
- 22Koop, G. J. (2013). An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(5), 527–539. DOI:
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-35127-003 - 23Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2023
- 24Leloup, L., Meert, G., & Samson, D. (2018). Moral judgments depend on information presentation: Evidence for recency and transfer effects. Psychologica Belgica, 58(1), 256. DOI: 10.5334/pb.421
- 25Malle, B. F. (2021). Moral judgments. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 293318. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-072220-104358
- 26Martin, J. W., Buon, M., & Cushman, F. (2021). The effect of cognitive load on intent-based moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 45(4). DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12965
- 27Piaget, J. (1995). Le jugement moral chez l’enfant [The moral judgment of the child] (9th ed.). Paris: PUF.
- 28Rivollier, G., Quinton, J.-C., Gonthier, C., & Smeding, A. (2021). Looking with the (computer) mouse: How to unveil problem-solving strategies in matrix reasoning without eye-tracking. Behavior Research Methods. 53, 1081–1096. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01484-3
- 29Rosas, A., & Aguilar-Pardo, D. (2020). Extreme time-pressure reveals utilitarian intuitions in sacrificial dilemmas. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(4), 534551. DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2019.1679665
- 30Samson, D., & Leloup, L. (2018). Moral scenarios manipulating the intention to harm, the outcome of the action and the order of the intention/outcome information – Set 2 (Version 1). figshare. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5117107.v1
- 31Spivey, M. J., & Dale, R. (2006). Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 207211. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00437.x
- 32Tassy, S., Deruelle, C., Mancini, J., Leistedt, S., & Wicker, B. (2013). High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00229
- 33Westfall, J. (2016).
PANGEA: Power ANalysis for GEneral Anova designs [Unpublished working paper] , University of Texas at Austin.http://jakewestfall.org/publications/pangea.pdf - 34Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000014
- 35Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains. Cognition, 120(2), 202214. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.005
- 36Yu, H., Siegel, J. Z., & Crockett, M. J. (2019). Modeling morality in 3-D: Decision-making, judgment, and inference. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(2), 409432. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12382