Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reply to Barbara Vetter Cover

Reply to Barbara Vetter

By: Kit Fine  
Open Access
|Sep 2025

References

  1. 1Bacon, A. 2018. ‘The Broadest Necessity’. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47(5): 733783. DOI: 10.1007/s10992-017-9447-9
  2. 2Fine, K. 2005. ‘The Varieties of Necessity’. In: Modality and Tense. Philosophical Papers, 235260. Oxford: Oxford University Press [orig. published 2002]. DOI: 10.1093/0199278709.003.0008
  3. 3Kment, B. 2014. Modality and Explanatory Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604685.001.0001
  4. 4Kratzer, A. 1977. ‘What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean’. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1: 337355. DOI: 10.1007/BF00353453
  5. 5Mandelkern, M, Schultheis, G and Boylan, D. 2017. ‘Agentive Modals’. Philosophical Review, 126(3): 301343. DOI: 10.1215/00318108-3878483
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.212 | Journal eISSN: 2515-8279
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 18, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 10, 2025
Published on: Sep 29, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Kit Fine, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.