Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reply to Barbara Vetter Cover

Reply to Barbara Vetter

By: Kit Fine  
Open Access
|Sep 2025

Figures & Tables

(1)it is ordinarily necessary that p just in case it is metaphysically necessary that if R then p
(2)it is necessary that p in context c just in case Rc and it is metaphysically necessary that if Rc then p, for c a suitable context and Rc the relevant conditions determined by that context.
(2a)[Intermediate Scope] it is necessary that p in context c just in case the relevant conditions R determined by c are such that R and it is metaphysically necessary that if R then p; or
(2b)[Wide Scope] the (actual) relevant conditions R determined by c are such that it is necessary that p in context c just in case it is metaphysically necessary that if R then p.
(3)it is necessary that p in context c just in case the relevant conditions R determined by c are such that R and necessarilyc if R then p
(3a)Suppose φ is the OMS ‘it is necessary that p’ and c is a suitable context for φ. Use ‘relevant’ for the standard of relevance determined by c and ‘necessarily’ for the special modality determined by c. Then the proposition expressed by φ in the context c is the proposition that there are relevant conditions R for which R and necessarily if R then p.
(3b)Suppose φ is the OMS ‘it is necessary that p’ and c is a suitable context for φ. Let R0 be the relevant conditions determined by c and ‘necessarily’ the special modality determined by c. Then the proposition expressed by φ in the context c is, if true, partially grounded in the proposition that necessarily if R0 then p.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.212 | Journal eISSN: 2515-8279
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 18, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 10, 2025
Published on: Sep 29, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Kit Fine, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.