References
- 1Barberousse, A, Franceschelli, S and Imbert, C. 2009. ‘Computer Simulations as Experiments’. Synthese, 169: 557–574. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-008-9430-7
- 2Beisbart, C. 2014. ‘Are We Sims? How Computer Simulations Represent and What This Means for the Simulation Argument’. The Monist, 97(3): 399–417. DOI: 10.5840/monist201497325
- 3Beisbart, C. 2019. ‘Virtual Realism: Really Realism or only Virtually so?’ A Comment on D. J. Chalmers’s Petrus Hispanus Lectures. Disputatio, 11(55): 297–331. DOI: 10.2478/disp-2019-0008
- 4Berger, M and Gostiaux, B. 2012. Differential Geometry: Manifolds, Curves, and Surfaces: Manifolds, Curves, and Surfaces. New York: Springer.
- 5Bertschinger, E and Jain, B. 1994. ‘Gravitational Instability of Cold Matter’. The Astrophysical Journal, 431, 486–494. DOI: 10.1086/174501
- 6Bostrom, N. 2003. ‘Are we living in a computer simulation?’ Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211): 243–255. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9213.00309
- 7Chalmers, DJ. 2017. ‘The Virtual and the Real’. Disputatio, 9(46): 309–352. DOI: 10.1515/disp-2017-0009
- 8Chalmers, DJ. 2019. ‘The Virtual as the Digital’. Disputatio, 11(55): 453–486. DOI: 10.2478/disp-2019-0022
- 9Chalmers, DJ. 2022. Reality+: Virtual worlds and the problems of philosophy. UK: Penguin.
- 10Declos, A. 2024. ‘Virtual properties: problems and prospects’. Erkenntnis. DOI: 10.1007/s10670-023-00771-7
- 11Dolag, K, et al. 2008. ‘Simulation Techniques for Cosmological Simulations’. Space Science Reviews, 134: 229–268. DOI: 10.1007/s11214-008-9316-5
- 12Fine, K. 1985. Reasoning with Arbitrary Objects. Oxford: B. Blackwell.
- 13Francescotti, R. 1999. ‘Mere Cambridge Properties’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 36(4): 295–308.
- 14Frigg, RP and Reiss, J. 2009. ‘The Philosophy of Simulation: Hot New Issues or Same Old Stew?’ Synthese, 169: 593–613. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-008-9438-z
- 15Godfrey-Smith, P. 2009. ‘Models and fictions in science’. Philosophical Studies, 143: 101–116. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-008-9313-2
- 16Hartmann, S. 1996.
‘The World as a Process: Simulations in the Natural and Social Sciences’ . In: Hegselmann, R, Troitzsch, KG and Mueller, U (eds.) Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View, Dordrecht: Kluwever, pp. 77–100. quoted from the revised version athttp://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002412/ . - 17Hilpinen, R. 2011. ‘Artifact. In: Zalta, EN (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), <
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/artifact/#2 >. - 18Humphreys, P. 2004. Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0195158709.001.0001
- 19Humphreys, P. 2009. ‘The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods’. Synthese, 169: 615–626. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-008-9435-2
- 20Klypin, AA and Shandarin, SF. 1983. ‘Three-dimensional numerical model of the formation of large-scale structure in the Universe’. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 204(3): 891–907. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/204.3.891
- 21Lawler, GF and Limic, V. 2010. Random walk: a modern introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750854
- 22McDonnell, N and Wildman, N. 2019. ‘Virtual Reality: Digital or Fictional?’ Disputatio, 11(55): 371–397. DOI: 10.2478/disp-2019-0004
- 23Oswald, Y, Malleson, N and Suchak, K. 2024. ‘An Agent-Based Model of the 2020 International Policy Diffusion in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic with Particle Filter’. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 27(2): 3. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.006
- 24Parker, W. 2009. ‘Does Matter Really Matter? Computer Simulations, Experiments, and Materiality’. Synthese, 169: 483–496. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-008-9434-3
- 25Pipa, F. 2024. ‘An indeterminacy-based ontology for quantum theory’. arXiv: 2404.07197 [quant-ph]
- 26Schlesinger, S, et al. 1979. ‘Terminology for Model Credibility’. Simulation, 32: 103–104. DOI: 10.1177/003754977903200304
- 27Smith, NJJ and Rosen, G. 2004. ‘Worldly Indeterminacy: A Rough Guide’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82 (Issue in Honour of David Lewis): 185–198. DOI: 10.1080/713659795
- 28Trenholme, R. 1994. ‘Analog Simulation’. Philosophy of Science, 61(1): 115–131. DOI: 10.1086/289783
- 29Tulodziecki, D. 2017.
‘Underdetermination’ . In: Saatsi, J (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism. New York: Routledge, pp. 60–71. DOI: 10.4324/9780203712498-6 - 30van Inwagen, P. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- 31Walton, KL. 1990. Mimesis as Make-believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.2307/2108134
- 32Winsberg, E. 1999. ‘Sanctioning Models. The Epistemology of Simulation’. Science in Context, 12: 275–292. DOI: 10.1017/S0269889700003422
- 33Winsberg, E. 2010. Science in the Age of Computer Simulations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.173 | Journal eISSN: 2515-8279
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 7, 2024
Accepted on: Oct 9, 2024
Published on: Nov 7, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2024 Claus Beisbart, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.