References
- 1Abell, C. 2020. Fiction: A Philosophical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198831525.001.0001
- 2Brouwer, T. 2022. ‘Social Inconsistency’. Ergo, 9. DOI: 10.3998/ergo.2258.
- 3Carruthers, P. 2006.
‘Why Pretend? In Nichols, S’. (ed.) The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretense, Possibility, and Fiction. (pp. 89–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275731.003.0006 - 4Chalmers, D. 2017. ‘The Virtual and the Real’. Disputatio, 9: 309–352. DOI: 10.1515/disp-2017-0009
- 5Chalmers, D. 2019. ‘The Virtual as the Digital’. Disputatio, 11: 453–486. DOI: 10.2478/disp-2019-0022
- 6Chalmers, D. 2022. Reality+. Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. London: Allen Lane.
- 7Chasid, A. 2017. ‘Imaginative Content, Design-Assumptions and Immersion’. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 8: 259–272. DOI: 10.1007/s13164-016-0315-2
- 8Currie, G. 1990. The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 9Currie, G and Ravenscroft, I. 2002. Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238089.001.0001
- 10Epstein, B. 2015. The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001
- 11Epstein, B. 2016. ‘A Framework for Social Ontology’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46: 147–67. DOI: 10.1177/0048393115613494
- 12Epstein, B. 2019. ‘Anchoring versus Grounding: Reply to Schaffer’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 99: 768–781. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12644
- 13Fisher, A. 2022. ‘Truth in Interactive Fiction’. Synthese, 200: 1–18. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03935-0
- 14Friedman, O and Leslie, AM. 2007. ‘The Conceptual Underpinning of Pretense: Pretending is Not ‘Behaving-As-If’’. Cognition, 105: 103–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.007
- 15Gallois, A. 2016.
‘Identity Over Time’ . In Zalta, E. N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/identity-time/ >. - 16Gendler, T. 2006. ‘Imaginative Contagion’. Metaphilosophy, 37: 183–203. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00430.x
- 17Kampa, S. 2018. ‘Imaginative Transportation’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96: 683–96. DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2017.1393832
- 18Khalidi, MA. 2015. Three Kinds of Social Kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 90: 96–112. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12020
- 19Langland-Hassan, P. 2020.
‘Explaining Imagination’ . Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198815068.001.0001 - 20Lewis, DK. 1978. ‘Truth in fiction’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15: 37–46.
- 21Ludlow, P. 2019. ‘The Social Furniture of Virtual Worlds’. Disputatio, 11: 345–369. DOI: 10.2478/disp-2019-0009
- 22McDonnell, N and Wildman, N. 2019. ‘Virtual Reality: Digital of Fictional?’ Disputatio, 11: 371–397. DOI: 10.2478/disp-2019-0004
- 23Nichols, S and Stich, S. 2000. ‘A Cognitive Theory of Pretense’. Cognition, 74: 115–147. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00070-0
- 24Nichols, S and Stich, S. 2003. Mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0198236107.001.0001
- 25Priest, G. 2006. [1987] In Contradiction. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.001.0001
- 26Schroeder, T and Matheson, C. 2006.
‘Imagination and Emotion’ . In Nichols, S. (ed.) The Architecture of the Imagination. (pp. 19–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275731.003.0002 - 27Stock, K. 2017. Only Imagine: Fiction, Interpretation, and Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198798347.001.0001
- 28Vallance, C. 2024. ‘Police Investigate Virtual Sex Assault on Girl’s Avatar’. BBC News, 2 January.
- 29Van de Mosselaer, N and Wildman, N. 2021.
‘Glitches as Fictional (Mis)communication’ . In Barker, T. & Korolkova, M. (eds.) Miscommunications: Errors, Mistakes, Media. (pp. 300–315). London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: 10.5040/9781501363825.0029 - 30Walton, K. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.2307/2108134
- 31Wasserman, R. 2021.
‘Material Constitution’ . In Zalta, E. N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/material-constitution/ >. - 32Weinberg, J and Meskin, A. 2006.
‘Puzzling Over the Imagination: Philosophical Problems, Architectural Solutions’ . In S. Nichols (ed.) The Architecture of Imagination (pp. 175–204). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275731.003.0010 - 33Wheeler, B. 2022. ‘Causation in a Virtual World: A Mechanistic Approach’. Philosophy and Technology, 35: 1–26. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-022-00502-w
- 34Wildman, N and Woodward, R. 2018.
‘Interactivity, Fictionality, and Incompleteness’ . In Robson, J. & Tavinor, G. (eds.) The Aesthetics of Videogames. (pp. 112–127). New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315210377-8 - 35Wolswijk, H. 2012. ‘Theft: Taking a Virtual Object in RuneScape: Judgment of 31 January 2012, case no. 10/00101 J’. Journal of Criminal Law, 76: 459–62. DOI: 10.1350/1740-5580-76.6.459
- 36Woodward, J. 2015. ‘Interventionism and Causal Exclusion’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91: 303–347. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12095
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.156 | Journal eISSN: 2515-8279
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 15, 2024
Accepted on: Oct 4, 2024
Published on: Nov 25, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2024 Robert Fraser, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.