Extended Dynamical Causal Modelling for Phase Coupling...

Abstract

We present a software tool: extended Dynamic Causal Modelling for Phase Coupling (eDCM PC). This framework is implemented in MATLAB as an extension of the Dynamic Causal Models for phase coupling method. eDCM PC is able to estimate effective connectivity between oscillating systems using the phase information obtained from experimental signals, such as oscillatory activities of neuronal populations in distant brain regions. With the help of a transformation function, eDCM PC can measure observable independent coupling functions within and between different frequency bands. This software is available on GitLab under the GNU General Public License (version 3 or later).

References

1Penny WD, Litvak V, Fuentemilla L, Duzel E, Friston K. Dynamic Causal Models for phase coupling. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2009;183(1):19–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.06.029
Back to article
2Winfree A. The Geometry of Biological Time. Biomathematics, Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1980. ISBN 9783540093732. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-22492-2
Back to article
3Pikovsky A, Rosenblum M, Kurths J. Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences. Cambridge nonlinear science series. Cambridge University Press; 2001. ISBN 9780511075957. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511755743
Back to article
4Strogatz S. Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. Penguin Books Limited; 2004. ISBN 9780141933184.
Back to article
5Buzsaki G. Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford University Press; 2006. ISBN 9780198041252.
Back to article
6Kuramoto Y. Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence, volume 19. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1984. ISBN 978-3-642-69691-6. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3
Back to article
7Hoppensteadt FC, Izhikevich EM. Weakly Connected Neural Networks, volume 126 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. New York, NY: Springer New York; 1997. ISBN 978-1-4612-7302-8. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1828-9
Back to article
8Rosenblum MG, Pikovsky AS. Detecting direction of coupling in interacting oscillators. Physical Review E. Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. 2001;64(4 Pt 2):045202. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.045202
Back to article
9Kralemann B, Cimponeriu L, Rosenblum M, Pikovsky A, Mrowka R. Uncovering interaction of coupled oscillators from data. Physical Review E. 2007;76(5):1–4. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.055201
Back to article
10Kralemann B, Cimponeriu L, Rosenblum M, Pikovsky A, Mrowka R. Phase dynamics of coupled oscillators reconstructed from data. Physical Review E 2008;77(6):1–16. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.066205
Back to article
11Kralemann B, Pikovsky A, Rosenblum M. Reconstructing phase dynamics of oscillator networks. Chaos. 2011;21(2):1–10. DOI: 10.1063/1.3597647
Back to article
12Stankovski T, Duggento A, McClintock PV, Stefanovska A. Inference of time-evolving coupled dynamical systems in the presence of noise. Physical Review Letters. 2012;109(2):1–5. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.024101
Back to article
13Kralemann B, Pikovsky A, Rosenblum M. Detecting triplet locking by triplet synchronization indices. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. 2013;87(5):1–6. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.052904
Back to article
14Kralemann B, Pikovsky A, Rosenblum M. Reconstructing effective phase connectivity of oscillator networks from observations. New Journal of Physics. 2014;16(8):085013. DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/8/085013
Back to article
15Stankovski T, Ticcinelli V, McClintock PVE, Stefanovska A. Coupling functions in networks of oscillators. New Journal of Physics. 2015;17(3):035002. DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/035002
Back to article
16Stankovski T, Pereira T, McClintock PVE, Stefanovska A. Coupling functions: Universal insights into dynamical interaction mechanisms. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2017;89(4):045001. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.045001
Back to article
17Pikovsky A. Reconstruction of a random phase dynamics network from observations. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics. 2018;382(4):147–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2017.11.012
Back to article
18Stankovski T, Pereira T, McClintock PV, Stefanovska A. Coupling functions: Dynamical interaction mechanisms in the physical, biological and social sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2019;377(2160). DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0039
Back to article
19Yeldesbay A, Fink GR, Daun S. Reconstruction of effective connectivity in the case of asymmetric phase distributions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2019;317(February):94–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.02.009
Back to article
20Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage. 2003;19(4):1273–1302. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7
Back to article
21Friston K, Mattout J, Trujillo-Barreto N, Ashburner J, Penny W. Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation. NeuroImage. 2007;34(1):220–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.035
Back to article
22Friston K, Ashburner J, Kiebel S, Nichols T, Penny W, editors. Statistical Parametric Mapping. Elsevier; 2007. ISBN 9780123725608. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-372560-8.X5000-1
Back to article
23David O, Kiebel SJ, Harrison LM, Mattout J, Kilner JM, Friston KJ. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG. NeuroImage. 2006;30(4):1255–1272. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.045
Back to article
24Chen CC, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ. Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses. NeuroImage. 2008;41(4):1293–1312. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.026
Back to article
25Chen CC, Kiebel SJ, Kilner JM, Ward NS, Stephan KE, Wang WJ, Friston KJ. A dynamic causal model for evoked and induced responses. NeuroImage. 2012;59(1):340–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.066
Back to article
26Stephan KE, Kasper L, Harrison LM, Daunizeau J, den Ouden HEM, Breakspear M, Friston KJ. Nonlinear dynamic causal models for fMRI. NeuroImage. 2008;42(2):649–662. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.262
Back to article
27Moran RJ, Stephan KE, Seidenbecher T, Pape HC, Dolan RJ, Friston KJ. Dynamic causal models of steady-state responses. NeuroImage. 2009;44(3):796–811. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.048
Back to article
28Tak S, Kempny AM, Friston KJ, Leff AP, Penny WD. Dynamic causal modelling for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. NeuroImage. 2015;111:338–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.035
Back to article
29Stephan KE, Penny WD, Moran RJ, den Ouden HEM, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ. Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage. 2010;49(4):3099–3109. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.015
Back to article
30Daunizeau J, David O, Stephan KE. Dynamic causal modelling: A critical review of the biophysical and statistical foundations. NeuroImage. 2011;58(2):312–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.062
Back to article
31David O, Harrison L, Friston K. Neuronal models of EEG and MEG. In: Statistical Parametric Mapping, Chapter 33. Elsevier; 2007. pp. 414–440. ISBN 9780123725608. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012372560-8/50033-4
Back to article
32Mu J, Liu S, Burkitt AN, Grayden DB. Multi-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential dataset. Scientific Data. 2024;11(1):1–15. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02841-5
Back to article
33Yeldesbay A, Huguet G, Daun S. Reconstruction of phase-amplitude dynamics from signals of a network of oscillators. Chaos. 2025;35(4). DOI: 10.1063/5.0251072
Back to article

Extended Dynamical Causal Modelling for Phase Coupling (eDCM PC)

Abstract

Paradigm

My account