Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Collaborative Care Models of Primary Care Clinics for People with Early-Stage Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Physicians in Japan Cover

Collaborative Care Models of Primary Care Clinics for People with Early-Stage Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Physicians in Japan

By: Shuji Tsuda,  Junichiro Toya and  Kae Ito  
Open Access
|Jun 2024

Figures & Tables

ijic-24-2-7726-g1.png
Figure 1

Flowchart of the participants.

Table 1

Sample characteristics.

n = 187%
Age30–3952.7%
40–492412.8%
50–596032.1%
60–696635.3%
70–993016.1%
SexMen14879.1%
Women3719.8%
SpecialtyInternal medicine13270.6%
Psychiatry2111.2%
Family medicine84.3%
Orthopaedic surgery63.2%
Neurosurgery63.2%
Surgery52.7%
Other94.8%
IISTYes6132.6%

[i] IIST, Initial-phase Intensive Support Team.

Table 2

Conditional probabilities of each variable for three-class latent class analysis.

CONCEPTSVARIABLESITEMSPCP-led (46.6%)CM-led (32.8%)Stand-alone (20.6%)
Team memberNumber of professions10.110.070.64
2–30.280.400.36
4≤0.610.520.00
Member’s decision-making responsibilityDoctorsYes1.000.511.00
No0.000.490.00
Care managersYes0.250.970.09
No0.750.030.91
Organisation’s roleHosting care conferencesClinics0.410.090.07
Other organisations0.460.730.18
Not held0.130.180.75
Responsibility in care decisionsClinics0.780.220.67
MCD0.080.050.24
CCSC0.150.540.06
LTC offices0.000.190.03
Clinic’s inter-organisation communicationwith MCDFace to face0.150.120.03
In writing0.560.680.58
None0.290.190.39
with CCSCFace to face0.900.790.27
In writing0.080.130.20
None0.020.080.53
with LTC officesFace to face0.760.830.14
In writing0.210.150.51
None0.030.020.35

[i] MCD, Medical Centre for Dementia; CCSC, Community-based Comprehensive Support Centre; LTC, long-term care.

Table 3

Comparative description of the three models.

MODEL NAMEMODEL DESCRIPTION
PCP-led Participatory Decision-making ModelPCPs take the lead in making care decisions for individuals with early-stage dementia, with CMs partially contributing. Verbal communication serves as the primary mode of interorganisational collaboration. PCPs and/or CMs host interprofessional care conferences across organisations, during which team members share information to coordinate care and inform decision-making.
CM-led Membership Responsibility ModelCMs assume the primary responsibility for making care decisions for individuals with early-stage dementia. PCPs participate in the interprofessional care team and attend conferences to fulfil their responsibilities of providing information and make care decisions pertaining of the medical aspect. Clinics, CCSCs, and LTC offices collaborate closely through direct communication across organisations.
Stand-alone and Letter Referrals ModelPCPs are solely responsible for care decision for individuals with early-stage dementia, in which CMs are not involved. The practice does not leverage Interprofessional team or care conferences. Clinics’ interorganisational communication relies on exchanges of written referrals and replies.
Table 4

Human resources and services of clinics in each model.

PCP-led (n = 84)CM-led (n = 55)Stand-alone (n = 36)p1 vs 21 vs 32 vs 3
Human resourcesDr (full time), mean, SD1.7(1.2)1.5(1.2)1.4(1.1)0.455
Dr (part time), mean, SD2.8(4.1)1.6(2.7)1.4(2.3)0.052
NS (full time), mean, SD2.9(3.8)2.2(4.4)1.1(1.9)0.056
NS (part time), mean, SD1.2(1.7)1.7(2.4)1.1(1.6)0.191
SW, n,%14(16.7%)4(7.3%)2(5.6%)0.109
CM, n,%11(13.1%)6(10.9%)2(5.6%)0.477
PT/OT/ST, n,%17(20.2%)10(18.2%)2(5.6%)0.13
Psych, n,%8(9.5%)3(5.5%)2(5.6%)0.597
Number of patients with early-stage dementia<5056(67.5%)38(70.4%)33(91.7%)0.027*
50–9912(14.5%)8(14.8%)0(0.0%)
100<15(18.0%)8(14.9%)3(8.4%)
Perceived time for Dr consultation<10 min24(29.3%)22(40.7%)16(45.7%)0.02*
10–19 min38(46.3%)27(50.0%)15(42.9%)
20–29 min15(18.3%)4(7.4%)3(8.6%)
30 < min5(6.1%)1(1.9%)1(2.9%)
Perceived time for NS consultation0 min45(57.0%)30(57.7%)26(76.5%)0.065
<10 min14(17.7%)14(26.9%)6(17.6%)
10–19 min12(15.2%)5(9.6%)2(5.9%)
20 < min8(10.1%)3(5.8%)0(0.0%)
SW or CM consultationYes11(13.2%)10(18.2%)1(2.9%)0.34

[i] PCP, primary care physician; CM, care manager; Dr, doctor; NS, nurse; SW, social worker; PT, physical therapist; OT, occupational therapist; ST, speech therapist; Psych, psychologist.

P-values for overall and pair-wise comparisons were calculated using chi-square and Z tests for categorical variables; one-way ANOVA and two-sample t-test for continuous variables; and Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests for ordinal variables. For the pair-wise comparisons, p-values were corrected with Bonferroni method. The symbol * indicates statistical significance for pair-wise comparisons.

Table 5

Daily practices of support provision in each model.

TOTAL (n = 175)PCP-led (n = 84)CM-led (n = 55)Stand-alone (n = 36)p1 vs 21 vs 32 vs 3
Cognitive function
      Assessment of cognitive function166(94.9%)84(100.0%)52(94.5%)30(85.7%)0.003*
      Medication for BPSD164(93.7%)81(96.4%)53(96.4%)30(85.7%)0.052
Physical health
      Assessment of physical health165(94.3%)81(96.4%)53(96.4%)31(88.6%)0.174
      Fall risk intervention151(86.3%)77(91.7%)47(85.5%)27(75.0%)0.051
Care planning
      Medical care plan160(91.4%)84(100.0%)49(90.7%)27(79.4%)<0.001*
      Long-term care plan153(87.4%)82(97.6%)46(83.6%)25(71.4%)<0.001**
Carer support
      Assessment of carers’ health status144(82.3%)79(94.0%)46(85.2%)19(54.3%)<0.001**
      Carer counselling100(57.1%)53(63.9%)32(59.3%)15(42.9%)0.105
Informational support
      Patient basic information116(66.3%)68(81.0%)35(63.6%)13(36.1%)<0.001*
      Carer basic information116(66.3%)71(85.5%)33(61.1%)12(34.3%)<0.001**
Psychological health
      Assessment of psychological health119(68.0%)57(67.9%)38(69.1%)24(66.7%)0.97
      Post-diagnostic counselling102(58.3%)53(63.1%)33(60.0%)16(44.4%)0.157
Social health
      Assessment of social health112(64.0%)63(75.0%)35(64.8%)14(40.0%)0.001*
      Dementia café98(56.0%)59(70.2%)29(53.7%)10(28.6%)<0.001*

[i] PCP, primary care physician; CM, care manager; BPSD, behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.

P-values for overall and pair-wise comparisons were calculated using chi-square and Z tests. For the pair-wise comparisons, p-values were corrected with Bonferroni method. The symbol * indicates statistical significance for pair-wise comparisons.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7726 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 28, 2023
Accepted on: May 21, 2024
Published on: Jun 3, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Shuji Tsuda, Junichiro Toya, Kae Ito, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.