Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Examining Macro-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Scaling Up Integrated Care from a Complexity Perspective: A Multi-Case Study of Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium Cover

Examining Macro-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Scaling Up Integrated Care from a Complexity Perspective: A Multi-Case Study of Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium

Open Access
|Nov 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Data collection methods across countries.

CAMBODIASLOVENIABELGIUM
  • 33 IDIs (meso and macro level)

  • 14 FGDs at 5 ODs

  • Exploratory literature and document review

  • 23 IDIs (meso and macro level)

  • 15 FGDs (micro level); 7 with patients with T2D and HT, 8 with health workers, including GPs, RNs, practice and community nurses

  • Exploratory literature and document review

  • 28 IDIs (meso and macro level stakeholders, selected from one federated (Flemish) and federal level)

  • Exploratory literature and document review

[i] Note: FGD = focus group discussion, GP = General Practitioner, HT = Hypertension, IDI = in-depth interview, OD = Operational district RN = Registered Nurse, T2D = Type 2 Diabetes.

Table 2

Identified barriers and facilitators to scale-up integrated care, based on the adapted WHO health system building blocks.

MAIN AND SUB-THEMESCAMBODIASLOVENIABELGIUM
1. GovernanceLimited governance for NCDs in line with limited financial commitment from government and donors and low implementation.Strong centralised governance with strong bureaucracy, with homogeneity across country, although inefficient collaborative governance between levels and sectors for NCDs.Fragmented, multi-level (partially decentralised) health governance necessitating a multi-stakeholder negotiation model making NCD coordination difficult.
2. Health service deliveryLack of UHC with low utilisation of public sector for NCD, WHO PEN roll-out is slow. Interprofessional collaboration with nurses/midwives and CHW in PHC.Near UHC and fairly integrated service delivery due to multi-profile teams and primary care gatekeeping.Near UHC but variation in primary care practice organisation affecting NCD care. Collaboration in interprofessional teams largely uncommon.
3. Health financingNCD low budget priority with limited financial coverage, resulting in underpayment of staff in public sector, low public coverage and high OOP.Relatively modest total healthcare expenditure with a growing share for PHC, with low OOP. Outdated provider payment model demotivates public sector primary care providers with increasing share of private providers.Inefficiencies in healthcare expenditure across tiers, primary care financing dominated by FFS provider payment system directly impeding IC.
4. HRHHR capacity insufficient (availability, distribution, skill-mix, due to insufficient mechanisms for motivation, for instance sufficient payment, training in IC provision, leadership and management. Public workforce challenges with moonlighting and brain drain to private sector.PHC with a relatively good skill-mix and collaboration attitude. Yet GPs are overburdened, dissatisfied, periodically threatening to strike or resign. Policies on task sharing with nurses, initiatives for further task-shifting to lay persons are being tested.Skill-mix in PHC skewed towards GPs with increasing workload. HRH policies towards IC include new primary care models incentivising multi-professional collaboration and task-sharing, training and organisation to facilitate IC. Differentiated primary care culture across the countries hampering nation-wide roll-out.
5. Medical supplyOverall insufficient availability and logistic systems hampering continuous supply at public facility level, driving people towards private sector.Well-resourced with access to all modern treatment options for patients.Well resourced, emphasis on access to newest forms of treatment, with less focus on rationalisation of drug prescribing.
6. HISFragmented and weak, no uniform electronic (web-based) system, no major NCD database.Fragmented, with no interoperability of different systems. HIS registration by clinicians not prioritised hence of poor quality.Fragmented, with no interoperability of different systems, notably that of social care with medical care. HIS registration by clinicians not prioritised hence of poor quality, also limited opportunities for population management.
7. Link health system-communityFocus on strengthening role of CHWs and HCWs at HCs. CHWs face challenges relating to technical and financial support, and hierarchy in relation to HCWs.Focus on low-level care (moving care closer to the patients and their home) and task delegation (towards more emphasis on peer support).Focus on strengthening linking PHC and social sector (difficult due to varying incentive systems in medical and social sector, e.g. FFS vs. salary) and increasing patient, social worker and local government representation and their roles in coordination of PHC.

[i] Note: CHW = community health worker, GP = general practitioner, FFS = fee-for-service, HC = health centre, HCWs = healthcare workers, HIS = health information system, HRH = human resources for health, IC = integrated care, MoH = Ministry of Health, NCD(s) = non-communicable disease(s), OOP = Out-of-pocket expenditure, PEN = Package of Essential NCD interventions (implemented in Cambodia), PHC = primary healthcare, UHC = universal health coverage, WHO = World Health Organisation.

ijic-24-4-7650-g1.png
Figure 1

Interactions between health system barriers and facilitators to integrated care in Cambodia.

Note: blue = governance; yellow = healthcare delivery; green = financing; red = HRH; dark green = medical supply; purple = HIS; orange = community.

ijic-24-4-7650-g2.png
Figure 2

Interactions between health system barriers and facilitators to integrated care in Slovenia.

Note: blue = governance; yellow = healthcare delivery; green = financing; red = HRH; dark green = medical supply; purple = HIS.

ijic-24-4-7650-g3.png
Figure 3

Interactions between health system barriers and facilitators to integrated care in Belgium.

Note: blue = governance; yellow = healthcare delivery; green = financing; red = HRH; dark green = medical supply; purple = HIS.

BoDBurden of disease
CHCCommunity health centre
CHWCommunity health worker
CLDCausal loop diagram
FFSFee-for-service
GDPGross Domestic Product
GPGeneral practitioner
HCHealth Centre
HCWHealthcare worker
HEChealth education centre
HISHealth information system
HRHHuman resources for health
HTHypertension
ICIntegrated care
ICCCInnovative care for chronic conditions
MoHMinistry of Health
NCDNon-communicable disease
NIHDINational Institute of Health and Disability Insurance
NGONon-governmental organisations
ODOperational district
OOPOut-of-pocket expenditure
PHCPrimary Healthcare
PCZPrimary Care Zone
PENPackage of essential NCD interventions
PESTELPolitical-Economic-Socio-cultural-Technological-Ecological-Legal (factors)
PHCPrimary healthcare
RHReferral hospital
RNRegistered nurse
SCUBY‘SCale-Up diaBetes and hYpertension care’ project (website: scuby.eu)
T2DType 2 Diabetes
THETotal health expenditure
UHCUniversal health coverage
WHOWorld Health Organization
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7650 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: May 5, 2023
Accepted on: Oct 11, 2024
Published on: Nov 12, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Monika Martens, Savina Chham, Črt Zavrnik, Katrien Danhieux, Edwin Wouters, Srean Chhim, Antonija Poplas Susič, Zalika Klemenc Ketiš, Por Ir, Roy Remmen, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Wim Van Damme, Grace Marie Ku, Josefien Van Olmen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.