Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Participatory Action Research as a Driver for Health Promotion and Prevention: A Co-creation Process Between Professionals and Citizens in a Deprived Neighbourhood in the Hague Cover

Participatory Action Research as a Driver for Health Promotion and Prevention: A Co-creation Process Between Professionals and Citizens in a Deprived Neighbourhood in the Hague

Open Access
|Nov 2023

References

  1. 1Marmot M. Social justice, epidemiology and health inequalities. European journal of epidemiology. 2017; 32(7): 537546. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-017-0286-3
  2. 2McCartney G, Popham F, McMaster R, Cumbers A. Defining health and health inequalities. Public health. 2019; 172: 2230. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.023
  3. 3Bambra C, Riordan R, Ford J, Matthews F. The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020; 74(11): 964968. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2020-214401
  4. 4Broeders D, Das D, Jennissen R, Tiemeijer WL, Visser MD. [From differences to potential, a realistic view on social economic health inequalities] [In Dutch]. Van verschil naar potentieel. Een realistisch perspectief op de sociaaleconomische gezondheidsverschillen. WRR-Policy Brief. 2018; 7.
  5. 5Scientific Council for Government Policy. From disparity to potential: a realistic perspective on socio-economic health inequalities. Policy Brief. The Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, Ministry of General Affairs; 2019.
  6. 6Wilderink L. Tackling health inequalities: Evaluating a local integrated community-based approach and strengthening that approach using participatory action research. [PhD-Thesis – Research and graduation internal, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam]. 2022.
  7. 7Dickens L, Watkins K. Action research: rethinking Lewin. Management Learning. 1999; 30(2): 127140. DOI: 10.1177/1350507699302002
  8. 8Abma T, Banks S, Cook T, Dias S, Madsen W, Springett J, Wright MT. Participatory research for health and social well-being. The Netherlands: Springer; 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93191-3
  9. 9Eelderink M. [Handbook participatory action research: Building a better world together [In Dutch]. Handboek participatief actieonderzoek: samen bouwen aan een betere wereld; 2020. DOI: 10.36254/978-90-8560-151-7
  10. 10Chevalier JM, Buckles DJ. Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. Routledge; 2019. DOI: 10.4324/9781351033268
  11. 11Cornish F, Breton N, Moreno-Tabarez U, et al. Participatory action research. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2023; 3: 34. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1
  12. 12Brydon-Miller M, Kral M, Ortiz Aragón A. Participatory action research: International perspectives and practices. International Review of Qualitative Research. 2020; 13(2): 103111. DOI: 10.1177/1940844720933225
  13. 13Kindon S, Pain R, Kesby M. Participatory action research: Origins, approaches and methods. In Participatory action research approaches and methods (pp. 3544). Routledge; 2007. DOI: 10.4324/9780203933671-13
  14. 14Abma TA, Broerse JEW. Patient Participation as Dialogue: Setting Research Agendas. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy. 2010; 13(2): 16073. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x
  15. 15Glimmerveen L, Nies H, Ybema S. Citizens as active participants in integrated care: Challenging the field’s dominant paradigms. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2019; 19(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4202
  16. 16Alakeson V, Bunnin A, Miller C. Coproduction of health and wellbeing outcomes: the new paradigm for effective health and social care. London: OPM; 2013.
  17. 17Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, Seid M, Armstrong G, Opipari-Arrigan L, Hartung H. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ quality & safety. 2016; 25(7): 509517. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315
  18. 18Farmer J, Taylor J, Stewart E, Kenny A. Citizen participation in health services co-production: a roadmap for navigating participation types and outcomes. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 2018; 23(6): 509515. DOI: 10.1071/PY16133
  19. 19Arcidiacono C, Tuozzi T, Procentese F. Community profiling in participatory action research. Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. 2016; 355364. DOI: 10.1093/med:psych/9780190243654.003.0035
  20. 20Allecijfers.nl. Available from: https://allecijfers.nl/wijk/wijk-36-moerwijk-den-haag/; 2022.
  21. 21Stringer ET, Aragón AO. Action research. Sage publications; 2020.
  22. 22SevenSenses. The Tangerine Method; 2022. Available from: seven-senses.nu/method/the-tangerine-method/.
  23. 23Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. Third edition, Sage, London; 2014.
  24. 24Abma TA, Cook T, Rämgård M, Kleba E, Harris J, Wallerstein N. Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization. Educational action research. 2017; 25(4): 489505. DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092
  25. 25Olshansky E, Sacco D, Braxter B, Dodge P, Hughes E, Ondeck M, Stubbs ML, Upvall MJ. Participatory action research to understand and reduce health disparities. Nurs Outlook. 2005 May-Jun; 53(3): 1216. PMID: 15988448. DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.002
  26. 26RVS, Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Samenleving [The Council of Public Health & Society]. [A fair change for a healthy live, in Dutch] Een eerlijke kans op gezond leven. Den Haag: RVS; 2021. Available from: www.raadrvs.nl/documenten/publicaties/2021/4/7/een-eerlijke-kans-op-gezond-leven.
  27. 27Bussemaker J, S Jongers T, Vonk R. Gezondheidsverschillen voorbij. TSG-Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen. 2021; 99(1): 3639. DOI: 10.1007/s12508-020-00291-7
  28. 28Freudenberg N, Tsui E. Evidence, power, and policy change in community-based participatory research. American Journal of Public Health. 2014; 104(1): 1114. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301471
  29. 29Dedding C, Goedhart NS, Broerse JE, Abma TA. Exploring the boundaries of ‘good’ Participatory Action Research in times of increasing popularity: dealing with constraints in local policy for digital inclusion. Educational Action Research. 2021; 29(1): 2036. DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2020.1743733
  30. 30van Heteren F, Raaphorst N, Groeneveld S, Bussemaker J. Professionals’ health conceptions of clients with psychosocial problems: an analysis based on an empirical exploration of semi-structured interviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances. 2023; 5: 100120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100120
  31. 31Russell C. We Don’t Have a Health Problem, We Have a Village Problem. Available from: www.nurturedevelopment.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/we-dont-have-a-health-problem-we-have-a-village-problem8259.pdf; 2017.
  32. 32Russell C. Rekindling Democracy: A Professional’s Guide to Working in Citizen Space. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
  33. 33Woelders S, Abma T. Participatory action research to enhance the collective involvement of residents in elderly care: About power, dialogue and understanding. Action research. 2019; 17(4): 528548. DOI: 10.1177/1476750319837330
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7560 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 23, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 13, 2023
Published on: Nov 29, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Wilma van der Vlegel-Brouwer, Madelon Eelderink, Jet Bussemaker, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.