Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation Cover

Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 23 (2023): Issue 1
By: Janine Benjamins,  Jan-Gerrit Duinkerken,  Gerlinde den Hamer-Jordaan,  Romay Canfijn,  Rianne Koster,  Emely de Vet and  Annemien Haveman-Nies  
Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. 1Contandriopoulos AP, Denis JL, Touati N, Rodriguez C. The integration of health care: dimensions and implementation. Working paper, Groupe de recherche interdisicplinaire en sante, Université de Montréal; 2004. http://www.irspum.umontreal.ca/rapportpdf/n04-01.pdf (accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  2. 2WHO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services, interim report; 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/180984 (accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  3. 3Podlog LW, Brown WJ. Self-determination Theory: A Framework for Enhancing Patient-centered Care. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2016; 12(8): e359–e62. DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2016.04.022
    Back to article
  4. 4Scholl I, Zill JM, Härter M, Dirmaier J. An Integrative Model of Patient-Centeredness – A Systematic Review and Concept Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(9): e107828. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107828
    Back to article
  5. 5Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling. 2002; 48(1): 51–61. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00099-X. DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00099-X
    Back to article
  6. 6WHO. Integrated care models: an overview – Working document. World Health Organization, regional office for Europe, Health Services Delivery Programme DoHSaPH; 2016 October 2016. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Health-systems/health-services-delivery/publications/2016/integrated-care-models-an-overview-2016 (accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  7. 7Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, Girosi F, et al. Can Electronic Medical Record Systems Transform Health Care? Potential Health Benefits, Savings, And Costs. Health Affairs. 2005; 24(5): 1103–17. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103
    Back to article
  8. 8Vos JFJ, Boonstra A, Kooistra A, Seelen M, van Offenbeek M. The influence of electronic health record use on collaboration among medical specialties. BMC Health Services Research. 2020; 20(1): 676. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-020-05542-6. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05542-6
    Back to article
  9. 9de Lusignan S, Mold F, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Wyatt JC, Quinn T, et al. Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(9): e006021. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X683941
    Back to article
  10. 10Benjamins JHA, Gunnink M, Goudkuil A, de Vet E. How the Use of a Patient-Accessible Health Record Contributes to Patient-Centered Care: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(1): e17655. https://www.jmir.org/2021/1/e17655/. DOI: 10.2196/17655
    Back to article
  11. 11Vermeir P, Degroote S, Vandijck D, Van Tiggelen H, Peleman R, Verhaeghe R, et al. The patient perspective on the effects of medical record accessibility: a systematic review. Acta Clin Belg. 2017; 72(3): 186–94. DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2016.1275375
    Back to article
  12. 12Bourgeois FC, DesRoches CM, Bell SK. Ethical Challenges Raised by OpenNotes for Pediatric and Adolescent Patients. Pediatrics. 2018; 141(6). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-2745
    Back to article
  13. 13Sarabu C, Lee T, Hogan A, Pageler N. The Value of OpenNotes for Pediatric Patients, Their Families and Impact on the Patient-Physician Relationship. Appl Clin Inform. 2021; 12(1): 76–81. https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0040-1721781. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721781
    Back to article
  14. 14Bayer R, Santelli J, Klitzman R. New challenges for electronic health records: confidentiality and access to sensitive health information about parents and adolescents. JAMA. 2015; 313(1): 29–30. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.15391
    Back to article
  15. 15Möhler R, Köpke S, Meyer G. Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2). Trials. 2015; 16: 204. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0709-y
    Back to article
  16. 16Siderius EJ, Carmiggelt B, Rijn CS-V, Heerkens YF. Preventive Child Health Care within the Framework of the Dutch Health Care System. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2016; 177: S138–S41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.04.050
    Back to article
  17. 17Transformatieplan Samenwerking Noord Veluwe 2018–2021. [Transformation Plan for Collaboration in the North-Veluwe region] Regio Noord Veluwe, Harderwijk; 2018 [in Dutch] https://vng.nl/sites/default/files/noord_veluwe.pdf. (accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  18. 18Dutch Ministry for Justice. Wet Geneeskundige BehandelOvereenkomst (WGBO). [Medical Treatment Contracts Act] 2006. [in Dutch] https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0007021/2006-02-01 (accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  19. 19Dutch government. Wet aanvullende bepalingen verwerking persoonsgegevens in de zorg. [(2018). [Act of Additional Provisions for Processing Personal Data in Healthcare] https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0023864/2020-07-01. [in Dutch] (accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  20. 20Leeuwis C, Aarts N. Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 2011; 17(1): 21–36. DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2011.536344
    Back to article
  21. 21Kilelu CW, Klerkx L, Leeuwis C. Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems. 2013; 118: 65–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.003
    Back to article
  22. 22WK Kellogg Foundation logic model development guide: WK Kellogg Foundation; 2004. https://ag.purdue.edu/extension/pdehs/Documents/Pub3669.pdf (Accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  23. 23Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2011; 38(2): 65–76. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
    Back to article
  24. 24Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989; 13(3): 319–40. DOI: 10.2307/249008
    Back to article
  25. 25Brooke J. SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usability. Usability evaluation in industry. London, UK: Taylor & Francis. 1996; p. 189–194.
    Back to article
  26. 26Pretty JN, Guijt I, Thompson J, Scoones I. Participatory learning and action–A trainers guide. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development; 1995 https://pubs.iied.org/6021iied (Accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  27. 27Tufte T, Mefalopulos P. Participatory communication: A practical guide. Washinghton, USA: The World Bank; 2009. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5940 (Accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  28. 28Bateson G. Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Bantam Books; 1979.
    Back to article
  29. 29Leeuwis C. Communication for rural innovation: rethinking agricultural extension. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd. 2004; 247–274. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.modares.ac.ir/uploads/En-Agr.Doc.AgriculturalExtension.3.pdf.
    Back to article
  30. 30Mandl C, Hauser M, Mandl H. (ed.) What is a Co-creative Meeting? The Co-creative Meeting. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. 2013; 7–13. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34231-8_2
    Back to article
  31. 31Kaner S. Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making. Jossey-Bass. 2014; 304–311.
    Back to article
  32. 32Tuckman BW. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological bulletin. 1965; 63(6): 384. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0022100. DOI: 10.1037/h0022100
    Back to article
  33. 33Tuckman BW, Jensen MAC. Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Studies. 1977; 2(4): 419–27. DOI: 10.1177/105960117700200404
    Back to article
  34. 34Rill B. Resonant co-creation as an approach to strategic innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2016; 29(7): 1135–52. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JOCM-01-2015-0009/full/html. DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-01-2015-0009
    Back to article
  35. 35Hersey P, Blanchard KH, Natemeyer WE. Situational Leadership, Perception, and the Impact of Power. Group & Organization Studies. 1979; 4(4): 418–28. DOI: 10.1177/105960117900400404
    Back to article
  36. 36Rotmans J. Societal innovation; between dream and reality lies complexity, Inaugural Speech. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit; 2005. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/7293/EIA-2005-026-ORG%20ROTMANS%20NL.pdf (Accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  37. 37Senge P, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross R, Roth G, Smith B, et al. The dance of change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organizations. Performance Improvement. 1999; 38(5): 55–8. DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4140380511
    Back to article
  38. 38Clemmer J. Harnessing the energy of change champions. Retrieved November. 2004; 20: 2004. https://www.clemmergroup.com/articles/harnessing-energy-change-champions/.
    Back to article
  39. 39Warrick DD. Developing organization change champions: a high payoff investment. OD practitioner. 2009; 41(1): 14–9. Available at https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1056.2803&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  40. 40King HS. Shifting from traditional to biopsychosocial pediatrics modifying the pediatrician-parent relationship to promote normal childhood development. The Permanente journal. 2005; 9(4): 60–3. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/05-039
    Back to article
  41. 41Black JM, Hoeft F. Utilizing biopsychosocial and strengths-based approaches within the field of child health: what we know and where we can grow. New directions for child and adolescent development. 2015; 2015(147): 13–20. DOI: 10.1002/cad.20089
    Back to article
  42. 42Fraccaro P, Vigo M, Balatsoukas P, Buchan IE, Peek N, van der Veer SN. Patient Portal Adoption Rates: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017; 245: 79–83. https://ebooks.iospress.nl/publication/48109.
    Back to article
  43. 43Aljabri D, Dumitrascu A, Burton MC, White L, Khan M, Xirasagar S, et al. Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018; 18(1): 70. https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12911-018-0644-4. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0644-4
    Back to article
  44. 44Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, Lipsitz SR, Karson AS, Wald JS, et al. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(6): 568–74. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/226918. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.34
    Back to article
  45. 45Myrah Wouters IS, van Lettow B, de Jong J, Judith Sinnige AB, Friele R, van Gennip L. E-Health monitor, E-health in verschillende snelheden. [E-Health monitor, E-health at different speeds] Den Haag en Utrecht: Nictiz en Nivel; 2018. [in Dutch] https://www.nictiz.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/eHealth-monitor_2018_digitaal.pdf (accessed on April 24th, 2023).
    Back to article
  46. 46Lester M, Boateng S, Studeny J, Coustasse A. Personal Health Records: Beneficial or Burdensome for Patients and Healthcare Providers? Perspectives in health information management. 2016; 13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832132/.
    Back to article
  47. 47Viswanath K, Kreuter MW. Health disparities, communication inequalities, and eHealth. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 32(5 Suppl): S131–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.012
    Back to article
  48. 48Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th edition. New York, USA: Free Press; 2003.
    Back to article
  49. 49Hekkert MP, Negro SO. Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological forecasting and social change. 2009; 76(4): 584–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013
    Back to article
  50. 50Gold RL. Roles in sociological field observations. Soc F. 1957; 36: 217. DOI: 10.2307/2573808
    Back to article
  51. 51Reason P, Torbert W. The action turn: Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and transformation. 2001; 6(1): 1–37. DOI: 10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea
    Back to article
  52. 52Bradbury-Huang H. What is good action research?: Why the resurgent interest? Action Research. 2010; 8(1): 93–109. DOI: 10.1177/1476750310362435
    Back to article
  53. 53Brydon-Miller M, Greenwood D, Maguire P. Why Action Research? Action Research. 2003; 1(1): 9–28. DOI: 10.1177/14767503030011002
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6905 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: May 14, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 6, 2023
Published on: Jun 16, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Electronic Health Records,
implementation,
integrated care,
child welfare,
child health services

© 2023 Janine Benjamins, Jan-Gerrit Duinkerken, Gerlinde den Hamer-Jordaan, Romay Canfijn, Rianne Koster, Emely de Vet, Annemien Haveman-Nies, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2023): Issue 1