Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Applying Elinor Ostrom’s Design Principles to Guide Co-Design in Health(care) Improvement: A Case Study with Citizens Returning to the Community from Jail in Los Angeles County Cover

Applying Elinor Ostrom’s Design Principles to Guide Co-Design in Health(care) Improvement: A Case Study with Citizens Returning to the Community from Jail in Los Angeles County

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 21 (2021): Issue 1
By: Glenn Robert,  Oli Williams,  Bertil Lindenfalk,  Peter Mendel,  Lois M. Davis,  Susan Turner,  Cedric Farmer and  Cheryl Branch  
Open Access
|Feb 2021

References

  1. 1Berwick DM. Era 3 for Medicine and Health Care. JAMA. 2016; 315(13): 1329–1330. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.1509
    Back to article
  2. 2Batalden P. Getting more health from healthcare: quality improvement must acknowledge patient coproduction—an essay by Paul Batalden. BMJ. 2018; 1: k3617. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k3617
    Back to article
  3. 3Palmer VJ, Weavell W, Callander R, et al. The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement. Medical Humanities. 2019; 45: 247–257. DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011398
    Back to article
  4. 4Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
    Back to article
  5. 5Mendel P, Davis LM, Turner S, et al. Co-Design of Services for Health and Reentry (CO-SHARE): An Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) Pilot Study with Individuals Returning to Community from Jail and Service Providers in Los Angeles County. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2019. DOI: 10.7249/RR2844
    Back to article
  6. 6Ostrom E. Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. World Development. 1996; 24(6): 1073–1087. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
    Back to article
  7. 7Ostrom E, Whitaker G. Does Local Community Control of Police make a Difference? Some Preliminary Findings. American Journal of Political Science. 1973; 17(1): 48–76. DOI: 10.2307/2110474
    Back to article
  8. 8Ostrom E, Parks RB, Whitaker GP et al. The public service production process: a framework for analyzing police services. Policy Studies Journal. 1978; 7: 381–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01782.x
    Back to article
  9. 9Robert G, Donetto S, Williams O. Co-design of healthcare services with patients. In: Loeffler E, Bovaird T (Eds.). Palgrave Handbook on Co-production. London: Palgrave Macmillan; forthcoming.
    Back to article
  10. 10Sangiorgi D, Prendiville A, Ricketts A. Mapping and developing service design research in the United Kingdom. London: University of the Arts London; 2014.
    Back to article
  11. 11Pfannstiel MA, Rasche C. (Eds). Service Design and Service Thinking in Healthcare and Hospital Management. Theory, Concepts, Practice. Switzerland: Springer; 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00749-2
    Back to article
  12. 12Sangiorgi D, Prendiville, A. (Eds). Designing for Service. Key issues and new directions. London: Bloomsbury; 2017. DOI: 10.5040/9781474250160
    Back to article
  13. 13Bate SP, Robert G. Bringing user experience to health care improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2007.
    Back to article
  14. 14Robert G, Cornwell J, Locock L, et al. Patients and staff as co-designers of health care services. British Medical Journal. 2015; 350, g7714. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7714
    Back to article
  15. 15Williams O, Sarre S, Papoulias S, Knowles S, Robert G, Beresford P, et al. Lost in the Shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production’. Health Research Policy & Systems. 2020; 18(43). DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0
    Back to article
  16. 16Nies H. Communities as co-producers in integrated care. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2014; 14(2). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.1589
    Back to article
  17. 17Glimmerveen L, Nies H, Ybema S. Citizens as active participants in integrated care: challenging the field’s dominant paradigms. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2019; 19(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4202
    Back to article
  18. 18Dawda P. Integrated healthcare: the past, present and future. Integrated Healthcare Journal. 2019; 1: e000001. DOI: 10.1136/ihj-2019-000001
    Back to article
  19. 19Goldhar J. Co-Design and Co-Delivery: The Benefits of Integration from the Family Caregiver’s Perspective. International Journal of integrated care. 2018; 18(3). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4225
    Back to article
  20. 20Robert G, Locock L, Williams O, Cornwell J, Donetto S, Goodrich J. Co-producing and co-designing healthcare services and interventions. Manuscript in preparation.
    Back to article
  21. 21Center for Behaviour, Institutions and the Environment. Arizona State University. CPR database. https://seslibrary.asu.edu/cpr [cited 2020 27 March].
    Back to article
  22. 22Cox M, Arnold G, Villamayor Tomás S. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society. 2010; 15(4): 38. DOI: 10.5751/ES-03704-150438
    Back to article
  23. 23Wilson DS, Ostrom E, Cox ME. Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2013; 90: S21–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.010
    Back to article
  24. 24Sanderson M, Allen P, Moran V, McDermott I, Osipovic D. Agreeing the allocation of scarce resources in the English NHS: Ostrom, common pool resources and the role of the state. Social Science & Medicine. 2020; 250. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112888
    Back to article
  25. 25Hardin G. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science; 1968: 1243–1248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
    Back to article
  26. 26McGinnis MD. (Ed.). Polycentric Governance and Development: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1999. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.16052
    Back to article
  27. 27Ostrom V, Tiebout CM, Warren R. The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry. American Political Science Review. 1961; 55(4): 831–42. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400125973
    Back to article
  28. 28Ostrom E. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change. 2010; 20(4): 550–557. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
    Back to article
  29. 29Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, et al. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2015; 24: 228–238. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627
    Back to article
  30. 30Point of Care Foundation. EBCD: Experience-based co-design toolkit. https://www.pointofcarefoundation.org.uk/resource/experience-based-co-design-ebcd-toolkit/ [cited 2020 31 March].
    Back to article
  31. 31Steins NA, Edwards VM. Collective action in common-pool resource management: The contribution of a social constructivist perspective to existing theory. Society & Natural Resources. 1999; 12(6): 539–57. DOI: 10.1080/089419299279434
    Back to article
  32. 32Ostrom E. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review. 2010; 100 (3): 641–72. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
    Back to article
  33. 33Singleton BE. What’s missing from Ostrom? Combining design principles with the theory of sociocultural viability. Environmental Politics. 2017 Nov 2; 26(6): 994–1014. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1364150
    Back to article
  34. 34Wang EA, Hong CS, Samuels L, Shavit S, Sanders R, Kushel M. Transitions Clinic: Creating A Community-Based Model of Health Care for Recently Released California Prisoners. Public Health Reports. 2010; 125(2): 171–177. DOI: 10.1177/003335491012500205
    Back to article
  35. 35Heiss C, Somers SA, Larson M. Coordinating Access to Services for Justice-Involved Populations. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, 2016.
    Back to article
  36. 36Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Strategy 1: Working With Patients and Families as Advisors: Implementation Handbook, 2013. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/systems/hospital/engagingfamilies/strategy1/Strat1_Implement_Hndbook_508_v2.pdf (cited 2020 23 May).
    Back to article
  37. 37Carman KL, Kristin L, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J. Patient and Family Engagement: A Framework for Understanding the Elements and Developing Interventions and Policies. Health Affairs. 2013; 32(2): 223–231. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133
    Back to article
  38. 38Mendel P, Ngo VK, Dixon E, Stockdale S, Jones F, Chung B, Jones A, Masongsong Z, Khodyakov D. Partnered Evaluation of a Community Engagement Intervention: Use of a ‘Kickoff’ Conference in a Randomized Trial for Depression Care Improvement in Underserved Communities. Ethnicity and Disease. 2011; 21(3): S1, 78–88.
    Back to article
  39. 39Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel J, Minkler M. (Eds). Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: Advancing Social and Health Equity, 3rd ed. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 2018.
    Back to article
  40. 40Meadows DH. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green, White River Junction; 2008.
    Back to article
  41. 41Gharajedaghi J. Systems Thinking, Managing Chaos and Complexity, A Platform for Designing Business Architecture, Third Edition. Elsevier; 2011.
    Back to article
  42. 42Stroh DP. Systems thinking for social change: a practical guide to solving complex problems, avoiding unintended consequences, and achieving lasting results. Chelsea Green Publishing Co; 2015.
    Back to article
  43. 43Armson R. Growing wings on the way: systems thinking for messy situations. Triarchy Press Limited; 2011.
    Back to article
  44. 44Clarke D, Jones F, Harris R, Robert G. What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open. 2017; 7: e014650. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650
    Back to article
  45. 45Ostrom E. Building trust to solve commons dilemmas: Taking small steps to test an evolving theory of collective action. In Games, groups, and the global good 2009 (pp. 207–228). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85436-4_13
    Back to article
  46. 46Cluley V, Radnor Z. Progressing the conceptualization of value co-creation in public service organizations. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. 2020; 3(3): 211–221. DOI: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvz024
    Back to article
  47. 47Cluley V, Parker S, Radnor Z. New development: Expanding public service value to include dis/value, Public Money & Management 2020. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2020.1737392
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5569 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 29, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 18, 2020
Published on: Feb 12, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
co-design,
common pool resources,
co-production,
healthcare improvement,
case study,
quality improvement

© 2021 Glenn Robert, Oli Williams, Bertil Lindenfalk, Peter Mendel, Lois M. Davis, Susan Turner, Cedric Farmer, Cheryl Branch, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 21 (2021): Issue 1Next article