3. Axe, D., 2022. The Russian Army Is Running Out Of Trucks For Its War In Ukraine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2022/03/18/as-predicted-the-russian-army-is-running-out-of-trucks-for-its-war-in-ukraine/?sh=5d8be8c2577c, 24. 3. 2022.
4. Barfoed, J., 2018. A COG Concept for Winning More Than Just Battles. Joint Force Quarterly. Issue 88, str. 116–123. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Publications/Article/1413045/a-cog-concept-for-winning-more-than-just-battles/, 9. 3. 2022.
6. Booth, A., Sutton, A., Papaioannou, D., 2016. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: SAGE.
12. Echevarria II, A. J., 2002. Clausewitz’s Center of Gravity: Changing Our Warfighting Doctrine--Again! Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute. https://www.clausewitz.com/readings/Echevarria/gravity.pdf, 28. 6. 2019.
13. Echevarria II, A. J., 2004. Center of Gravity: Recommendations for Joint Doctrine. Joint Force Quarterly. Issue 35, str. 10–17. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a520978.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
14. Echevarria II, A. J., 2012. Clausewitz’s Center of Gravity Legacy. Infinity Journal. Special Edition, str. 4–7. https://www.infinityjournal.com/article/45/Clausewitzs_Center_of_Gravity_Legacy/, 9. 3. 2022.
15. Eikmeier, D. C., 2004. Center of Gravity Analysis. Military Review. 84-4, str. 2–5. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/87ac/bf7de2fa3c8f63f462bc4 a9da4b104afd01e.pdf, 7. 3. 2022.
17. Eikmeier, D. C., 2012. Modernizing the Center of Gravity Concept – So It Works. C. Perez, Jr., ur. Addressing the Fog of COG: Perspectives on the Center of Gravity in US Military Doctrine. Fort Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute Press, str. 133–168.
18. Eikmeier, D. C., 2015. Operational Art, Design and the Center of Gravity, Pt. 4 of 4 [video predavanje]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RYbtyzfB1w, 9. 3. 2022.
19. Evans, M., 2012. Centre of Gravity Analysis in Joint Military Planning and Design: Implications and Recommendations for the Australian Defence Force. Security Challenges. 8-2, str. 81–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26468953, 7. 3. 2022.
21. Fox, A., in Kopsch, T., 2017. Moving Beyond Mechanical Metaphors: Debunking the Applicability of Centers of Gravity in 21st Century Warfare. https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2017/6/2/moving-beyond-mechanical-metaphors-debunking-the-applicability-of-centers-of-gravity-in-21st-century-warfare, 7. 3. 2022.
28. Holloway, D., 2022. Read the fine print: Russia’s nuclear weapon use policy. https://thebulletin.org/2022/03/read-the-fine-print-russias-nuclear-weapon-use-policy/, 15. 3. 2022.
29. Holmes, Jr., F. S., 1972. The Schlieffen Plan: Case History of the Relation of Military Strategy to National Security Policy. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0760506, 9. 3. 2022.
33. Jones, S. G., in Wasielewski, P. G., 2022. Russia’s Possible Invasion of Ukraine. https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-possible-invasion-ukraine, 12. 3. 2022.
35. Kagan, F. W., Bugayova, N., Barros, G., Stepanenko, K., Clark, M., 2021. Putin’s Likely Course of Action in Ukraine. https://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Ukraine%20Invasion%20Forecast%20Series%20Part%202%20ISW%20CT%20December%202021.pdf, 12. 3. 2022.
38. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 2021. Socio-political moods of the population of Ukraine: the results of a survey conducted on October 25-29, 2021 by the method of personal (»face-to-face«) interviews. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1069&page=1, 12. 3. 2022.
39. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 2022. Socio-political moods of the population of Ukraine: perception of the threat of military invasion by Russia and the case against P. Poroshenko according to data of a telephone survey conducted on January 20-21, 2022. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1091&page=1, 12. 3. 2022.
40. Mattelaer, A., 2009. The Crisis in Operational Art. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/International%20Security/1109esdf_mattelaer.pdf, 7. 3. 2022.
41. Mavropoulos, P., 2017. Can the Clausewitzian paradoxical trinity help us understand better the center of gravity concept? http://www.warandstrategy.gr/2-uncategorised/63-the-clausewitzian-concepts-of-paradoxical-trinity-and-center-of-gravity-interdependence, 7. 3. 2022.
42. McKinney, R., 2022. Vladimir Putin made ‚terrible mistake‘ invading Ukraine, University of Missouri prof says. https://eu.columbiatribune.com/story/news/education/campus/2022/03/04/vladimir-putin-russia-ukraine-war-unifies-nato-sanctions-oligarchs-missouri-professor/9345090002/, 23. 3. 2022.
43. Melton, S. L., 2012. Center of Gravity Analysis—the Black Hole of Army Doctrine. C. Perez, Jr., ur. Addressing the Fog of COG: Perspectives on the Center of Gravity in US Military Doctrine. Fort Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute Press, str. 81–100.
44. Meyer, E. L., 2022. The centre of gravity concept: contemporary theories, comparison, and implications. Defence Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2030715, 25. 3. 2022.
45. MMC RTV, 2022. Doneck in Lugansk zaprosila Rusijo za pomoč pri spopadu z ukrajinsko vojsko. https://www.rtvslo.si/svet/s-in-j-amerika/doneck-in-lugansk-zaprosila-rusijo-zapomoc-pri-spopadu-z-ukrajinsko-vojsko/613403, 11. 3. 2022.
47. Oryx, 2022. Attack On Europe: Documenting Equipment Losses During The 2022 Russian Invasion Of Ukraine. https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html, 24. 3. 2022.
48. Palmgren, A., 2006. Centre of Gravity: Application and Utility of the Concept in the Modern Art of War. Tiede ja ase. Nro 64, str. 63–83. https://journal.fi/ta/article/view/47917/13791, 7. 3. 2022.
49. Paparone, C. R., in Davis, Jr., W. J., 2012. Exploring Outside the Tropics of Clausewitz: Our Slavish Anchoring to an Archaic Metaphor. C. Perez, Jr., ur. Addressing the Fog of COG: Perspectives on the Center of Gravity in US Military Doctrine. Fort Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute Press, str. 65–80.
51. RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty, 2022. How Long Could Ukraine Hold Out Against A New Russian Invasion? https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-ukraine-invasion-scenarios/31614428.html, 11. 3. 2022.
53. Sandford, A., in Brezar, A., 2022. Ukraine war: UN overwhelmingly condemns invasion as Russia and Ukraine dispute who controls Kherson. https://www.euronews.com/2022/03/02/ukraine-war-biden-vows-putin-will-pay-a-price-as-russia-targets-urban-areas, 24. 3. 2022.
54. SCM Globe, 2022. Russian Logistics for the Invasion of Ukraine. https://www.scmglobe.com/russian-logistics-for-the-invasion-of-ukraine/, 26. 3. 2022.
55. Stewart, P., in Ali, I., 2022. 80 % of Russia‘s forces around Ukraine in attack positions, U.S. official says. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/80-russias-forces-around-ukraine-attack-positions-us-official-says-2022-02-23/, 18. 3. 2022.
56. Schneider, J. J., in Izzo, L. J., 1987. Clausewitz’s Elusive Center of Gravity. Parameters. 17-september, str. 46–57. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9383/fd2a8abd0d614b3a52dd1038a1f7db86fb77.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
57. Strange, J., 1996. Centers of Gravity & Critical Vulnerabilities: Building on the Clausewitzian Foundation So That We Can All Speak the Same Language. Quantico: Marine Corps University.
58. Strange, J., 2005. Centers of Gravity & Critical Vulnerabilities: Building on the Clausewitzian Foundation So That We Can All Speak the Same Language. Quantico: Marine Corps University.
59. Strange, J., in Iron, R., b. d. Understanding Centers of Gravity and Critical Vulnerabilities: Part 2. https://theforge.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/adfwtc04_centres_of_gravity_and_critical_vulnerabilities_by_strange_and_iron.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
62. The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2022. The Military Balance 2022. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tmib20/122/1?nav=tocList, 14. 3. 2022.
66. Vandersteen, K. P., 2012. Center of Gravity: A Quest for Certainty or Tilting at Windmills? C. Perez, Jr., ur. Addressing the Fog of COG: Perspectives on the Center of Gravity in US Military Doctrine. Fort Leavenworth: Combat Studies Institute Press, str. 33–64.
67. Vego, M., 2000. Center of Gravity. Military Review. 80-2, str. 23–29. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-51912017/center-of-gravity, 28. 6. 2019.
68. Vego, M., 2007. Clausewitz’s Schwerpunkt: Mistranslated from German – Misunderstood in English. Military Review. 87-1, str. 101–109. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-51912017/center-of-gravity, 28. 6. 2019. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20070228_art014.pdf, 9. 3. 2022.
71. Vershinin, A., 2021. Feeding the Bear: A Closer Look at Russian Army Logistics and the Fait Accompli. https://warontherocks.com/2021/11/feeding-the-bear-a-closer-look-at-russian-army-logistics/, 15. 3. 2022.
73. Wall, M., 2022. 40-mile-long Russian invasion convoy visible from space in new 3D satellite view (video). https://www.space.com/russia-ukraine-invasion-convoy-3d-satellite-video, 24. 3. 2022.
74. War on the Rocks, 2022. In the Fourth Week, is Russia Revising its War Aims Amidst Attrition? https://warontherocks.com/2022/03/in-the-fourth-week-is-russia-revising-itswar-aims-amidst-attrition/, 22. 3. 2022.
75. Warden III, J. A., 1992. Employing Air Power in the Twenty-first Century. R. H. Shultz, Jr. in R. L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr., ur. The Future of Air Power in the Aftermath of the Gulf War. Maxwell Air Force Base: Air University Press, str. 57–82.
76. Warden III, J. A., 1994. Air Theory for the Twenty-first Century. K. P. Magyar, ur. Challenge and Response: Anticipating US Military Security Concerns. Maxwell Air Force Base: Air University Press, str. 351–376.
77. Warden III, J. A., 1995. The Enemy as a System. Airpower Journal. IX-1, str. 40–55. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/ASPJ/journals/Volume-09_Issue-1-Se/1995_Vol9_No1.pdf, 28. 6. 2019.
78. Yin, R. K., 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: SAGE.