Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Causes of automotive recalls and classification of product and process failures: evidence from Brazil, the European Union and the United States Cover

Causes of automotive recalls and classification of product and process failures: evidence from Brazil, the European Union and the United States

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Abdul Majid, K., & Bapuji, H. 2024. Consumer liability and firm responsiveness: evidence from automobile recalls. Journal of International Business Policy, 7, 337–355.
  2. ABRACICLO. 2020. Vendas varejo – Emplacamentos. Associação brasileira dos fabricantes de motocicletas ciclomotores, motonetas, bicicletas e similares, available at: https://www.abraciclo.com.br/site/vendas-varejoemplacamentos (accessed 06 May 2020).
  3. ACEM. 2019. Motorcycle, moped and quadricycle registrations European Union 2010-2018. The European association of motorcycle manufacturers, available at: https://www.acem.eu/market-data (accessed 22 March 2019).
  4. ACEM. 2020. Registrations in the European Union – 2019. The European association of motorcycle manufacturers, available at: https://www.acem.eu/market-data (accessed 06 May 2020).
  5. ANFAVEA. 2020. Anuário da indústria automobilística brasileira. Associação nacional dos fabricantes de veículos automotores, São Paulo.
  6. ANFAVEA. 2024. Anuário da indústria automobilística brasileira. Associação nacional dos fabricantes de veículos automotores, São Paulo.
  7. Babcock, D. and Morse, L.C. 2002. Managing engineering and technology, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  8. Bansal, P., & Kockelman, K. M. 2017. Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies. Transportation Research Part A, 95, 49–63.
  9. Baraldi, E.C. and Kaminski, P.C. 2011. Ergonomic planned supply in an automotive assembly line. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Wiley Periodicals, Inc, 21, 104-119, DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20228.
  10. Baraldi, E.C. and Kaminski, P.C. 2016. A study on the causes of recall in automotive vehicles marketed in Brazil. SAE Technical Paper Series, 36, 1-6, DOI: 10.4271/2016-36-0169.
  11. Baraldi, E.C. and Kaminski, P.C. 2018. Reference model for the implementation of new assembly processes in the automotive sector. Cogent Engineering, 5, 1-27, DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2018.1482984.
  12. Bates, H., Holweg, M., Lewis, M. and Oliver, N. 2007. Motor vehicle recalls: Trends, patterns and emerging issues. Omega, 35, 202-210, DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.05.006.
  13. Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. 2009. DRM, a design research methodology. Springer, New York.
  14. Bowdle, S., & Kamal, F. 2025. Trade Compliance at What Cost? Lessons from USMCA Automotive Trade. FEDS Notes.
  15. Brasil. 1985. Decreto nº 91.469, de 24 de julho de 1985. Dos Direitos do Consumidor. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 25 July 1985.
  16. Brasil. 1990. Lei nº 8.078, de 11 de setembro de 1990. Dos Direitos do Consumidor. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 11 September 1990.
  17. Brasil. 1993. Lei nº 8.656, de 21 de maio de 1993. Altera dispositivo da Lei nº 8.078, de 11 de setembro de 1990, que dispõe sobre a proteção do consumidor e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 21 May 1993.
  18. Brasil. 1997. Lei nº 2.181, de 20 de março de 1997. Dispõe sobre a organização do Sistema Nacional de Defesa do Consumidor – SNDC. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 20 March 1997.
  19. Brasil. 2018. Recalls bateram novo recorde em 2017. Ministério da Justiça, available at: http://justica.gov.br/news/recalls-bateram-novo-recordeem-2017 (accessed 19 March 2018).
  20. Brasil. 2018a. Ministério da Justiça. available at: http://www.justica.gov.br (accessed 12 July 2018).
  21. Brasil. 2019. Portaria Conjunta nº 3, de 1 de julho de 2019. Disciplina o procedimento de chamamento dos consumidores. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 01 July 2019.
  22. Brasil. 2012. Portaria nº 487, de 15 de março de 2012. Disciplina o procedimento de chamamento dos consumidores ou recall de produtos e serviços que, posteriormente à sua introdução no mercado de consumo, forem considerados nocivos ou perigosos. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 15 March 2012.
  23. Brasil. 2019a. Portaria nº 618, de 1 de julho de 2019. Disciplina o procedimento de comunicação da nocividade ou periculosidade de produtos e serviços após sua colocação no mercado de consumo. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 01 July 2019.
  24. Broughel, J. and Ellig J. 2018. FDA Regulations should be safe and effective. Mercatus Center at George Mason University, available at: https://www.mercatus.org/research/data-visualizations/fda-regulations-should-be-safe-and-effective (accessed 18 July 2018).
  25. Committee on commerce, science and transportation. 2019. Danger behind the wheel: The Takata airbag crisis and how to fix our broken auto recall process, United States Senate, Available at: https://business.cch.com/plsd/senatetakataairbagreportjune2015.pdf (accessed 24 March 2019).
  26. Conner, S.L. and Wanasika, I. 2018. General Motors: The ignition switch from hell’Journal of Case Studies, 36, 2, 66-81.
  27. CPSC. 2018a. Consumer Product Safety Commission, available at: https://www.cpsc.gov (accessed 10 July 2018).
  28. CPSC. 2020. Consumer Product Safety Commission, available at: https://www.saferproducts.gov (accessed 07 May 2020).
  29. Drucker, P. 2017. Inovação e espírito empreendedor: Prática e princípios. Cengage, São Paulo.
  30. Eifler, T. and Howard, T.J. 2018 .The importance of robust design methodology: case study of the infamous GM ignition switch recall. Research in Engineering Design, 29, 39-53, DOI: 10.1007/s00163-017-0251-x.
  31. Eilert, M., Jayachandran, S., Kalaignanam, K. and Swartz, T.A. 2017. Does it pay to recall your product early? An empirical investigation in the automobile industry. Journal of Marketing, 81, DOI: 10.1509/jm.15.0074. EPA. 2018a. United States Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://www.epa.gov (accessed 12 July 2018).
  32. EPA. 2018b. 2009-2011 Compliance Report. United States Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100H9M8.TXT (accessed 18 July 2018).
  33. EPA. 2018c. 2012-2013 Compliance Report. United States Environmental Protection Agency, available at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100NO1R.TXT (accessed 18 July 2018).
  34. European Commission. 2014. Directive 2014/45/EU on periodic roadworthiness tests. Official Journal of the European Union, 29 April 2014.
  35. European Commission. 2018a. General product safety directive, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/general-product-safety-directive_en (accessed 19 March 2018).
  36. European Commission. 2018b. RAPEX - Rapid alert system for dangerous non-food products, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumers_safety/safety_products/rapex/alerts/?event=main.listNotifications (accessed 13 September 2018).
  37. European Commission. 2021. RAPEX - Rapid alert system for dangerous non-food products. Recalls in the European from the Commission’s Safety Gate team (Personal information), Message from <just-rapex@ec.europa.eu> on 12 February 2021.
  38. European Commission. 2020. Safety Gate: Rapid Alert System for dangerous non-food products - Search alerts, Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/safety-gate-alerts/screen/search?resetSearch=true (accessed 22 August 2020).
  39. European Commission. 2018c. Vehicle categories, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/automotive/vehicle-categories_en accessed 14 September 2018).
  40. European Union. 2001. Directive 2001/95/EC - General Product Safety Regulations or GPS Regulations. Official Journal of the European Communities, 3 December 2001.
  41. European Union. 2019. Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Communities, 27 November 2019.
  42. FDA. 2020 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov (accessed 07 May 2020).
  43. Gazcón-Rivera, A., Nosedal-Sánchez, J., and Trigos, F. 2021. Transactional failure mode and effect analysis an application to map risks in the service industry. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9, 4, 1467-1475, DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.07.004.
  44. Gil, A.C. 2002. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. Atlas: São Paulo. Haefele, S. and Westkämper, E. 2014. Identification of product safety-relevant tasks for global automotive manufacturers, Procedia CIRP, 17, 326-331, DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.052.
  45. Hora, M., Bapuji, H. and Roth, A.V. 2011. Safety hazard and time to recall: The role of recall strategy, product defect type, and supply chain player in the US toy industry, Journal of Operations Management, 29, 7-8, 766-777, DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.006.
  46. Gruber, G. E., Kaminski, P. C., & Baraldi, E. C. 2021. A comparison of motor vehicle recalls between Brazil and Germany, Product, 19 (1), e20200003.
  47. Ibusuki, U. and Kaminski, P.C. 2007. Product development process with focus on value engineering and target-costing: a case study in an automotive company, International Journal of Production Economics, 105, 459-474, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.08.009.
  48. Imielinski, T. and Mannila, H. 1996. A Database perspective on knowledge discovery, Communications of the ACM, 39. 11.
  49. Janssen, C., Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C.B. 2015. Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility, Business Horizons, 58, 183-192, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.11.002.
  50. Jun, HB., Jung, S., Kim, H. et al. 2025. A Case Study on the DTC Prediction of Commercial Vehicles Using Machine Learning Approach, International Journal of Automotive Technology, 26, 1327–1341, DOI: 10.1007/s12239-025-00223-x
  51. Kalaignanam, K., Kushwaha, T. and Eilert, M. 2013. The impact of product recalls on future product reliability and future accidents: Evidence from the automobile industry, Journal of Marketing, 77, 41-57, DOI: 10.1509/jm.11.0356.
  52. Kim, B., Koenigsberg, O., Ofek, E. 2022. I Don’t “Recall”: The Decision to Delay Innovation Launch to Avoid Costly Product Failure, Management Science, 68, 12, 8889-8908, DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4303.
  53. Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2013.
  54. Kumar, S. and Schmitz, S. 2011. Managing recalls in a consumer product supply chain – root cause analysis and measures to mitigate risks, International Journal of Production Research, 49, 235–253, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2010.508952.
  55. Levin, D. 2000. Organizational learning and the transfer of knowledge: An investigation of quality improvement, Organization Science, 11, 6, 630-647, DOI: 10.1287/orsc.11.6.630.12535.
  56. Mackelprang, A., Habermann, M. and Swink, M. 2015. How firm innovativeness and unexpected product reliability failures affect profitability, Journal of Operations Management, 38, 71-86, DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2015.06.001.
  57. Maione, B.F. Kaminski, P.C. and Baraldi, E.C. 2023. The automotive recall data search and its analysis applying machine learning, Production, 33, e20220117, 1-17, DOI: 10.1590/0103-6513.20220117.
  58. Maione, B.F., Kaminski, P.C. and Baraldi, E.C. 2023. Automotive Recall Codes, GitHub repository, Available at: https://github.com/Maionepy/Automotive-Recall-Codes (accessed 05 January 2023a).
  59. Maione, B.F., Kaminski, P.C. and Baraldi, E.C. 2021. The different legislation of automotive recall and their implications for society, SAE International, 36, 1-12, DOI: 10.4271/2020-36-0084.
  60. Maiorescu, R.D. 2016. Crisis management at General Motors and Toyota: An analysis of gender-specific communication and media coverage. Public Relations Review, 42, 3, 556-563, DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.011.
  61. Mallik, A.K. 2023. The future of the technology-based manufacturing in the European Union. Results in Engineering, 19, DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng. 2023.101356.
  62. Maruchecka, A., Greisb, N., Mena, C. and Caid, L. 2011. Product safety and security in the global supply chain: Issues, challenges and research opportunities. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 7-8, 707-720, DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.007.
  63. MIC. 2020. U.S. total motorcycle sales 2007 – 2017. Motorcycle industry council, available at: https://www.mic.org/#/statistics (accessed 03 May 2020).
  64. Ministério da Justiça. 2017. Campanhas de recalls 2017. Secretaria nacional do consumidor, [Brasil], 2017.
  65. Ministério da Justiça. 2020. Recall em Números e Normas. Secretaria nacional do consumidor, [Brasil], 2020.
  66. Ministério da Justiça. 2020ª. Dados Abertos - Campanhas de Recall, available at: http://portal.mj.gov.br/recall/principal/openData (accessed 5 May 2020a).
  67. Motorcycles Data. 2020. United States Motorcycles Market, available at: https://motorcyclesdata.com/ (accessed 5 May 2020).
  68. Nassar, S., Kandil, T., Er Kara, M. and Ghadge, A. 2020. Automotive recall risk: impact of buyer‒supplier relationship on supply chain social sustainability, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69, 3, 467-487, 2020, DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2019-0026.
  69. NHTSA. 2021. State of the Takata airbag recalls, available at: https://www.nhtsa.gov/takata-recall-spotlight/state-takata-air-bag-recalls-fourth-report (accessed 15 April 2021).
  70. NHTSA. 2020. Recall Annual Count, available at: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/2019_recall_annual_count_final-031620-v1-tag.pdf (accessed 5 May 2020).
  71. NHTSA. 2020a. Takata Recall Spotlight, available at: https://www.nhtsa.gov/equipment/takata-recall-spotlight (accessed 05 January 2020).
  72. NHTSA. 2020b. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, available at: https://www.nhtsa.gov (accessed 13 February 2020).
  73. NHTSA. 2014. New manufacturers handbook - Requirements for manufacturers of motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment, U.S. Government publication, 1-68.
  74. NHTSA. 2021. Recall, available at: https://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov (accessed 21 February 2021).
  75. NHTSA. 2026. Recall, available at: https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls (accessed 01 February 2026).
  76. OECD/EUROSTAT. 2005. Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. The measurement of scientific and technological activities. OECD Publishing, Paris.Official Journal of the European Communities (2002), “Directive 2001/95/EC” of the European parliament and of the Council, Brussels, p. 14.
  77. OICA. 2020. Provisional registrations or sales of new vehicles - all types. Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d’Automobiles (International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers), available at: http://www.oica.net/production-statistics/ (accessed 05 May 2020).
  78. Raithel, S., Hock, S.J. & Mafael, A. 2024. Product recall effectiveness and consumers’ participation in corrective actions. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 52, 716–735. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-023-00967-x
  79. Raithel, S., Homburg, C., & Bornemann, T. 2024. Corporate transparency and regulatory enforcement in product recalls. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing.
  80. Recalls. 2018. Your online resource for recalls, available at: www.recalls.gov (accessed 10 July 2018).
  81. Rupp, N.G. and Taylor, C.R. 2002. Who initiates recalls and who cares? Evidence from the automobile industry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, 123-149, DOI: 10.1111/1467-6451.00171.
  82. Santos, H. D. A., & Nunes, A. 2025. Brazilian Automotive Industry: Decades of incentives and their results. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 30 (7), 58–63.
  83. Secretaria Nacional do Consumidor. 2018. Tabela recalls SENACON 2011 A 2018 - Coordenação-Geral de Consultoria Técnica e Sanções Administrativas, (Personal information), Message from <leonardo.villalobos@mj.gov.br> on 10 September 2018.
  84. SENACON. 2022a. Secretaria Nacional do Consumidor, Available at: http://portal.mj.gov.br/recall/principal/openData (accessed 27 November 2022).
  85. SENACON. 2022b. Alertas de Recall, Available at: http://portal.mj.gov.br/recall/ (accessed 27 November 2022).
  86. Slack, N., Chambers, S. and Johnston, R. 2010. Operations management, Pearson education, London: 2010.
  87. Schniederjans, D. and Khalajhedayati, M. 2021. Product recall strategy in the supply chain: utility and culture, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38, 195-212.
  88. Schoettle, B. and Sivak, M. 2020. Vehicle safety recalls: Why drivers don’t heed them, available at: https://news.umich.edu/vehicle-safety-recalls-why-drivers-don-t-heed-them/ (accessed 2 January 2020).
  89. Shi, W., Leng, K., Van N. I., Liu, Y. and Chen, X. 2020. Vehicle recalls performance in an emerging market: Evidence from the comparison between China and U.S. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, 132(C), 290-307, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.006.
  90. Souiden, N., and Pons, F. 2009. Product recall crisis management: the impact on manufacturer’s image, consumer loyalty and purchase intention. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18, 106-114.
  91. TÜV Rheinland. 2025. Brazilian Motor Vehicle Homologation Process, available at: https://www.tuv.com/ (accessed 01 February 2026).
  92. U.S.A. 2023. U.S. Code Title 49 – Transportation 2015 Edition, available at: https://uscode.house.gov (accessed 22 April 2023).
  93. U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2012. Vehicle Safety Inspections: Practices and Effectiveness.
  94. USGC. 2020. United States Coast Guard, available at: https://www.uscgboating.org/ (accessed 07 May 2020).
  95. Zhu, A.Y., VON Zedtwitz, M. and Assimakopoulos, D. 2018. Responsible product innovation: putting safety first, Springer: Washington.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2026.32.25 | Journal eISSN: 2353-7779 | Journal ISSN: 2353-5156
Language: English
Page range: 316 - 334
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 17, 2026
Published on: May 8, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Emilio Carlos Baraldi, Paulo Carlos Kaminski, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.