Assessing raw material efficiency and waste management for Sustainable Development: A VIKOR and TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
References
- Abdulvahitoglu, A., Kilic, M., 2022. A new approach for selecting the most suitable oilseed for biodiesel production; the integrated AHP-TOPSIS method. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), 101604. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.10.002
- Abubakar, I. R., Maniruzzaman, K. M., Dano, U. L., AlShihri, F. S., AlShammari, M. S., Ahmed, S. M. S., Al-Gehlani, W. A. G., Alrawaf, T. I., 2022. Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), Article 19. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912717
- Ali, M. H., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., Foroughi, B., 2019. Impacts of Environmental Factors on Waste, Energy, and Resource Management and Sustainable Performance. Sustainability, 11(8), 2443. DOI: 10.3390/su11082443
- Alrasheedi, A. F., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Cavallaro, F., 2023. Multicriteria group decision making approach based on an improved distance measure, the SWARA method and the WASPAS method. Granular Computing, 8(6), 1867–1885. DOI: 10.1007/s41066-023-00413-x
- Andreopoulou, Z., Koliouska, C., Galariotis, E., Zopounidis, C., 2018. Renewable energy sources: Using PROMETHEE II for ranking websites to support market opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 31–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.007
- Bączkiewicz, A., Kizielewicz, B., 2021. Towards Sustainable Energy Consumption Evaluation in Europe for Industrial Sector Based on MCDA Methods. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 1334–1346. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.137
- Bączkiewicz, A., Wątróbski, J., Kizielewicz, B., Sałabun, W., 2021. Towards Objectification of Multi-Criteria Assessments: A Comparative Study on MCDA Methods. 2021 16th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS), 417–425. DOI: 10.15439/2021F61
- Bao, Q., Yuxin, Z., Yuxiao, W., Feng, Y., 2020. Can Entropy Weight Method Correctly Reflect the Distinction of Water Quality Indices? Water Resources Management, 34(11), 3667–3674. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-020-02641-1
- Bathrinath, S., Bhalaji, R. K. A., Saravanasankar, S., 2021. Risk analysis in textile industries using AHP-TOPSIS. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 1257–1263. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.722
- Bid, S., Siddique, G., 2019. Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. Heliyon, 5(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01956
- Çelikbilek, Y., Tüysüz, F., 2020. An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis. Journal of Management Analytics, 7(2), 281–300. DOI: 10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528
- Chaurasiya, S., Singh, G., 2024. Exploring Sustainable Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review of Literature and Practices. In V. S. Sharma, U. S. Dixit, A. Gupta, R. Verma, & V. Sharma (Eds.), Machining and Additive Manufacturing, 11–19, Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-6094-1_2
- Chodha, V., Dubey, R., Kumar, R., Singh, S., Kaur, S., 2022. Selection of industrial arc welding robot with TOPSIS and Entropy MCDM techniques. Materials Today: Proceedings, 50, 709–715. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.487
- Cinelli, M., Coles, S. R., Kirwan, K., 2014. Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Ecological Indicators, 46, 138–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.011
- Cinelli, M., Kadziński, M., Gonzalez, M., Słowiński, R., 2020. How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy. Omega, 96, 102261. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261
- Depczyński, R., 2022. The assessment of product groups and efficiency in the use of raw materials and waste management towards sustainable development – case study of the steel manufacturing company in Poland. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 4306–4317. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.494
- Deshpande, P. C., Skaar, C., Brattebø, H., Fet, A. M., 2020. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of endof-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway. Science of The Total Environment, 719, 137353. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2020.137353
- Elavarasan, R. M., Nadarajah, M., Shafiullah, G. M., 2024. Multi-criteria decision analysis of clean energy technologies for envisioning sustainable development goal 7 in Australia: Is solar energy a game-changer? Energy Conversion and Management, 321, 119007. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman. 2024.119007
- Feo, G. D., Gisi, S. D., 2014. Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal. Waste Management, 34(11), 2225–2238. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.028
- Ferla, G., Mura, B., Falasco, S., Caputo, P., Matarazzo, A., 2024. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for sustainability assessment in food sector. A systematic literature review on methods, indicators and tools. Science of The Total Environment, 946, 174235. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174235
- Garcia-Garcia, G., 2022. Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making to optimise solid waste management. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 37, 100650. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100650
- Gupta, H., 2018. Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 35–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.06.001
- Hashemi, A., Dowlatshahi, M. B., Nezamabadi-pour, H., 2021. VMFS: A VIKOR-based multi-target feature selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 182, 115224. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115224
- Kazakova, E., Lee, J., 2022. Sustainable Manufacturing for a Circular Economy. Sustainability, 14(24), 17010. DOI: 10.3390/su142417010
- Kizielewicz, B., Sałabun, W., 2024. SITW Method: A New Approach to Re-identifying Multi-criteria Weights in Complex Decision Analysis. Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and Operational Research, 1(1), Article 1. DOI: 10.31181/smeor11202419
- Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., Sałabun, W., 2023. pymcdm—The universal library for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. SoftwareX, 22, 101368. DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2023.101368
- Krishnan, A. R., Kasim, M. M., Hamid, R., Ghazali, M. F., 2021. A Modified CRITIC Method to Estimate the Objective Weights of Decision Criteria. Symmetry, 13(6), Article 6. DOI: 10.3390/sym13060973
- Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y., Hwang, C.-L., 1994. TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(3), 486–500. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8
- Lombardi Netto, A., Salomon, V. A. P., Ortiz-Barrios, M. A., Florek-Paszkowska, A. K., Petrillo, A., De Oliveira, O. J., 2021. Multiple criteria assessment of sustainability programs in the textile industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, 28(3), 1550–1572. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12871
- Morris, K. C., 2020. Sustainable Manufacturing Is Smart Manufacturing. NIST. https://www.nist.gov/blogs/taking-measure/sustainable-manufacturing-smart-manufacturing
- Omran, I. I., Al-Saati, N. H., Al-Saati, H. H., Hashim, K. S., Al-Saati, Z. N., 2021. Sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment techniques in urban areas of Iraq using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA. Water Practice and Technology, 16(2), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.013
- Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Arcidiacono, A., 2022. Assessing urban quality: A proposal for a MCDA evaluation framework. Annals of Operations Research, 312(2), 1427–1444. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2738-2
- Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.-H., 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
- Qammar, R., Abidin, Z. U., Sair, S. A., Ahmad, I., Mansour, A. Z., Owidha, H. F. A. A., 2023. Impact of waste management among Industry 4.0 and sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(45), 100743–100752. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-28987-8
- Sałabun, W., Shekhovtsov, A., Kizielewicz, B., 2021. A New Consistency Coefficient in the Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Domain. In M. Paszynski, D. Kranzlmüller, V. V. Krzhizhanovskaya, J. J. Dongarra, & P. M. A. Sloot (Eds.), Computational Science – ICCS 2021, 715–727. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77961-0_57
- Sałabun, W., Wątróbski, J., Shekhovtsov, A., 2020. Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods. Symmetry, 12(9), 1549. DOI: 10.3390/sym12091549
- Shekhovtsov, A., Kizielewicz, B., Sałabun, W., 2023. Advancing individual decision-making: An extension of the characteristic objects method using expected solution point. Information Sciences, 647, 119456. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.119456
- Torres, P. S., Gomes, C. F. S., Santos, M. D., 2024. Selection of unmanned aerial vehicle systems for border monitoring using the MPSI-SPOTIS method. Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics, 8(1), 80–104. DOI: 10.1108/JDAL-12-2023-0016
- Tuş, A., Aytaç Adalı, E., 2019. The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem. OPSEARCH, 56(2), 528–538. DOI: 10.1007/s12597-019-00371-6
- Valencia, A., Zhang, W., Chang, N.-B., 2022. Sustainability transitions of urban food-energy-water-waste infrastructure: A living laboratory approach for circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177, 105991. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105991
- Wang, Z., Xiong, H., Zhang, F., Ma, C., 2024. Integrated assessment of groundwater vulnerability in arid areas combining classical vulnerability index and AHP model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(31), 43822–43834. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-34031-0
- Wątróbski, J., 2023. Temporal PROMETHEE II — New multi-criteria approach to sustainable management of alternative fuels consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 413, 137445. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137445
- Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., Ziemba, E., Sałabun, W., 2023. Temporal VIKOR—A New MCDA Method Supporting Sustainability Assessment. In G. C. Silaghi, R. A. Buchmann, V. Niculescu, G. Czibula, C. Barry, M. Lang, H. Linger, & C. Schneider (Eds.), Advances in Information Systems Development: AI for IS Development and Operations, 187–206, Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-32418-5_11
- Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M., 2019. Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega, 86, 107–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004
- Whichello, C., Smith, I., Veldwijk, J., Wit, G. A. de, Molken, M. P. M. H. R., Bekker-Grob, E. W. de., 2023. Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices. PLOS ONE, 18(7), e0283926. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283926
- Więckowski, J., Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., Sałabun, W., 2023. RANCOM: A novel approach to identifying criteria relevance based on inaccuracy expert judgments. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 122, 106114. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106114
- Więckowski, J., Sałabun, W., 2024. MakeDecision: Online system for the graphical design of decision-making models in crisp and fuzzy environments. SoftwareX, 26, 101658. DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2024. 101658
- Więckowski, J., Sałabun, W., Kizielewicz, B., Bączkiewicz, A., Shekhovtsov, A., Paradowski, B., Wątróbski, J., 2023. Recent advances in multi-criteria decision analysis: A comprehensive review of applications and trends. International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems, 27(4), 367–393. DOI: 10.3233/KES-230487
- Więckowski, J., Wątróbski, J., Kizielewicz, B., Sałabun, W., 2023. Complex sensitivity analysis in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An application to the selection of an electric car. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, 136051. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136051
- Yang, W., Xu, K., Lian, J., Ma, C., Bin, L., 2018. Integrated flood vulnerability assessment approach based on TOPSIS and Shannon entropy methods. Ecological Indicators, 89, 269–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.015
- Ziemba, P., 2021. Selection of Electric Vehicles for the Needs of Sustainable Transport under Conditions of Uncertainty—A Comparative Study on Fuzzy MCDA Methods. Energies, 14(22), Article 22. DOI: 10.3390/en14227786
Language: English
Page range: 537 - 550
Submitted on: Aug 30, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 28, 2024
Published on: Nov 21, 2024
Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2024 Radosław Depczyński, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.