Have a personal or library account? Click to login
KPI tree - a hierarchical relationship structure of key performance indicators for value streams Cover

KPI tree - a hierarchical relationship structure of key performance indicators for value streams

Production Engineering Archives
Volume 29 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)
By: Alberto BumbaORCID,  Manuel GomesORCID,  Cristiano JesusORCID and  Rui M. LimaORCID  
Open Access
|Apr 2023

References

  1. Aikhuele, D. O., Ansah, R. H., Sorooshian, S., 2017. Performance model formation for lean product design and development. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 1092–1100.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Ante, G., Facchini, F., Mossa, G., Digiesi, S., 2018a. Developing a key performance indicators tree for lean and smart production systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 13–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.227
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Ante, G., Facchini, F., Mossa, G., Digiesi, S., 2018b. Developing a key performance indicators tree for lean and smart production systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 13–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.227
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Beelaerts van Blokland, W., van de Koppel, S., Lodewijks, G., Breen, W., 2019. Method for performance measurement of car companies from a stability-value leverage perspective: The balancing act between investment in R&D, supply chain configuration and value creation. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(1), 411–434. DOI: 10.1108/IJLSS-03-2017-0024
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Braz, R. G. F., Scavarda, L. F., Martins, R. A., 2011. Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: An action research. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 751–760. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Carneiro, J. Q., Carneiro, A. Q., Machado, V. A., Cândido, L. F., Neto, J. de P. B., 2017. Lean Metric System. 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), July, 629–636. DOI: 10.24928/2017/0306
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Chiarini, A., Vagnoni, E., 2015. World-class manufacturing by Fiat. Comparison with Toyota Production System from a Strategic Management, Management Accounting, Operations Management and Performance Measurement dimension. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 590–606. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2014.958596
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Cross, K. F., Lynch, R. L., 1988. The “SMART” way to define and sustain success. National Productivity Review, 8(1. DOI: 10.1002/npr.4040080105
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., Jackson, P. R., Jaspersen, L. J., 2018. Management and Business Research (6th editio). SAGE Publications.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Eckerson, W. W., 2009. Performance management strategies: How to Create and Deploy Effective Metrics. In TDWI Best Practices Report.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, TJ., Silvestro, R., Voss, C., 1991. Performance Measurement in Service Businesses. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Hatzigeorgiou, A., Manoliadis, O., 2017. Assessment of performance measurement frameworks supporting the implementation of lean construction. IGLC 2017 - Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, II(July), 153–160. DOI: 10.24928/2017/0073
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. International Standard ISO 22400-1., 2014. ISO 22400-1:2014 Automation systems and integration — Key performance indicators (KPIs) for manufacturing operations management — Part 1: Overview, concepts and terminology. ISO, 1, 19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. International Standard ISO 22400-2., 2014a. ISO 22400-2:2014 Automation systems and integration — Key performance indicators (KPIs) for manufacturing operations management — Part 2: Definitions and descriptions. ISO, 1, 60.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. International Standard ISO 22400-2., 2014b. ISO 22400-2:2014 Automation systems and integration — Key performance indicators (KPIs) for manufacturing operations management — Part 2: Definitions and descriptions. ISO, 1, 60.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Jooste, J. L., Botha, L. J., 2018a. Improvements towards the identification and quantification of relationships between key performance indicators. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 29(2), 92–101. DOI: 10.7166/29-2-1872
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Jooste, J. L., Botha, L. J., 2018b. Improvements towards the identification and quantification of relationships between key performance indicators. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 29(2), 92–101. DOI: 10.7166/29-2-1872
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Kang, N., Zhao, C., Li, J., Horst, J. A., 2016a. A Hierarchical structure of key performance indicators for operation management and continuous improvement in production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 54(21), 6333–6350. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1136082
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Kang, N., Zhao, C., Li, J., Horst, J. A., 2016b. A Hierarchical structure of key performance indicators for operation management and continuous improvement in production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 54(21), 6333–6350. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1136082
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P., 2005. The balanced scorecard: Measures That drive performance. In Harvard Business Review (Vol. 83, Issues 7–8). Harvard Business School Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Khaba, S., Bhar, C., 2017. Modeling the key barriers to lean construction using interpretive structural modeling. Journal of Modelling in Management, 12(4), 652–670. DOI: 10.1108/JM2-07-2015-0052
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Lu, Y., 2017. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Mejjaouli, S., Babiceanu, R., 2014. Holonic Condition Monitoring and Fault-Recovery System for Sustainable Manufacturing Enterprises. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 544, 31–46. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04735-5-3
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Neely, A., Gregory, M., Platts, K., 1995. Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. DOI: 10.1108/01443579510083622
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Nudurupati, S. S., Tebboune, S., Hardman, J., 2016. Contemporary performance measurement and management (PMM) in digital economies. Production Planning Control, 27(3), 226–235. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2015.1092611
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Olivella, J., Gregorio, R., 2015. A case study of an integrated manufacturing performance measurement and meeting system. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(4), 515–535. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-09-2012-0089
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Peñaloza, G. A., Formoso, C. T., Saurin, T. A., 2017. Safety performance measurement systems based on Resilience engineering: A literature review. IGLC 2017 - Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, II(July), 903–910. DOI: 10.24928/2017/0326
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Perera, S., Perera, C., 2019. Performance measurement system for a lean manufacturing setting. Measuring Business Excellence, 23(3), 240–252. DOI: 10.1108/MBE-11-2018-0087
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Rodriguez, R. R., Saiz, J. J. A., Bas, A. O., 2009. Quantitative relationships between key performance indicators for supporting decision-making processes. Computers in Industry, 60(2), 104–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2008.09.002
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Roth, N., Deuse, J., Biedermann, H., 2020. A framework for System Excellence assessment of production systems, based on lean thinking, business excellence, and factory physics. International Journal of Production Research, 58(4), 1074–1091. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1612113
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Ruano Pérez, J. L., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, R., Alfaro-Saiz, J. J., Verdecho, M. J., 2018. An ANP-based network to measure the impact of lean production on organisational performance. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(2), 222–228. DOI: 10.3926/jiem.2536
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Saiz, J. J. A., Bas, A. O., Rodríguez, R. R., 2007. Performance measurement system for enterprise networks. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(4), 305–334. DOI: 10.1108/17410400710745324
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Saleheen, F., Miraz, M. H., Habib, M. M., Hanafi, Z., 2014. Challenges of warehouse operations: A case study in retail supermarket. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 3(4), 63–67.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Staedele, A. E., Ensslin, S. R., Forcellini, F. A., 2019. Knowledge building about performance evaluation in lean production: An investigation on international scientific research. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(5), 798–820. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0277
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Stricker, N., Echsler, F. M., Lanza, G., 2017. Selecting key performance indicators for production with a linear programming approach. International Journal of Production Research, 55(19), 5537–5549. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1287444
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Susilawati, A., 2021. Productivity enhancement: lean manufacturing performance measurement based multiple indicators of decision making. Production Engineering, 0123456789. DOI: 10.1007/s11740-021-01025-7
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Suzaki, K., 2017. Lean - Gestão no chão de fábrica (LeanOp Press, Ed.; 2a). LeanOp.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. P., Roos, D., 1990. The Machine thad changed the world: Vol. 1a (I. Collier Macmillan Canada, Ed.; 1a). Collier Macmillan Canada, Inc.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Zhu, L., Johnsson, C., Mejvik, J., Varisco, M., Schiraldi, M., 2018. Key performance indicators for manufacturing operations management in the process industry. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2017-Decem, 969–973. DOI: 10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290036
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2023.29.21 | Journal eISSN: 2353-7779 | Journal ISSN: 2353-5156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 175 - 185
Submitted on: Jun 18, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 9, 2022
Published on: Apr 26, 2023
Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Performance Measurement System,
KPI – Key Performance Indicators,
Value stream performance,
Lean Production,
Continuous Improvement
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Business management, other,
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Production technology,
Process engineering and industrial engineering,
Materials sciences,
Materials sciences, other

© 2023 Alberto Bumba, Manuel Gomes, Cristiano Jesus, Rui M. Lima, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 29 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)Next article