Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of the use of artificial intelligence in the management of Industry 4.0 projects. The perspective of Polish industry Cover

Analysis of the use of artificial intelligence in the management of Industry 4.0 projects. The perspective of Polish industry

By: Bartosz WachnikORCID  
Open Access
|Feb 2022

References

  1. Andrews, C.J., Baptista, A.I., Patton, S.L.W., 2005. Grounded theory and multi-agent simulation for a small firm. (in) Agent-Based Simulation: From Modelling Methodologies to Real-World Applications, Terano T., Kita H., Kaneda T., Arai K., Deguchi H., eds., Springer, Tokio, Japan.
  2. Auksztol, J., 2008. Outsourcing Informatyczny w Teorii i Praktyce Zarządzania. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk, Poland.
  3. Auth, G., Jokisch, O., Dürk, Ch., 2019. Revisiting automated project management in the digital age – a survey of AI approaches. eJournal of Applied Knowledge Management, 7(1), DOI: 10.36965/OJAKM.2019.7(1)27-3910.36965/OJAKM.2019.7(1)27-39
  4. Bendel, O., 2016. 300 Keywords Informationsethik: Grundwissen aus Computer-, Netz- und Neue-Medien-Ethik sowie Maschinenethik. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, Germany.
  5. Best Practice Solutions, https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/prince2 (accessed 16.04.2021).
  6. Bradley, K., 2002. Podstawy Metodyki PRINCE II CRM S.A. Centrum Rozwiązań Menadżerskich, Warszawa, Poland.
  7. Bukłaha, E., Juchniewicz, M., 2019. Kluczowe wyzwania i bariery oraz trendy w zarządzaniu projektami z punktu widzenia projektów realizowanych w Polsce. Przegląd Organizacji, 3 (950), 14-20.10.33141/po.2019.03.03
  8. Cao, J.Q., Zhang, S.H., 2016. ITIL Incident Management Process Reengineering in Industry 4.0 Environments. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Informatics (AMEII 2016), 73, 1011-1016.10.2991/ameii-16.2016.193
  9. Chang, S.I., 2004. ERP Life Cycle Implementation, Management and Support. Implications for Practice and Research, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
  10. Czakon, W. (ed.), 2011. Podstawy Metodologii Badań w Naukach o Zarządzaniu, Oficyna Wolters Kluwer Business, Warszawa, Poland.
  11. Daly, A. et al., 2019. Artificial Intelligence, governance and ethics: global perspectives, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law Research, 2019(15), Hong Kong, China, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.341480510.2139/ssrn.3414805
  12. Davis, J., Hoffert, J., Vanlandingham, E., 2016. A taxonomy of artificial intelligence approaches for adaptive distributed real-time embedded systems. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), DOI: 10.1109/EIT.2016.753524610.1109/EIT.2016.7535246
  13. Esteves J., Bohorquez V., 2007. An updated ERP systems annotated bibliography 2001–2005. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(1), 1-59, DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.0191810.17705/1CAIS.01918
  14. Esteves, J., Pastor, J., 2006. Organizational and technological critical success factors behavior along 35 the ERP implementation phases, (in) 36 Enterprise Information Systems VI. Seruca, I., Cordeiro, J., Hammoudi, S., Felipe, J. (eds), Springer, Netherlands.
  15. European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu (accessed 05.03.2021).
  16. Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., Welch, M., 2013. Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/embracing-digital-technology/ (accessed 28.03.2019).
  17. Gaton, J., 2017. Rise of the project bots, Microsoft Project User Group (MPUG). https://www.mpug.com/articles/rise-project-bots/
  18. Groover, M.P., 2008. Automation, Production Systems, and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, third ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
  19. ITIL, https://www.itlibrary.org/ (accessed 16.04.2021).
  20. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E., 2019. The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines, Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389-399, DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-210.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
  21. Kotarba, M., 2018. Digital transformation of business models, Foundations of Management, 10, DOI: 10.2478/fman-2018-001110.2478/fman-2018-0011
  22. Lahmann, M., 2018. AI will transform project management. Are you ready? PwC, https://www.pwc.ch/en/insights/risk/ai-will-transform-project-management-are-you-ready.html (accessed 13.09.2021)
  23. Larsson, S., Heintz, F., 2020. Transparency in Artificial Intelligence. Internet Policy Review, 9 (2), 1-16, DOI: 10.14763/2020.2.146910.14763/2020.2.1469
  24. Lee, J., 2013. Industry 4.0 in Big Data environment. German Harting Magazine, 26, 8-10.
  25. Leviathan, Y., Matias, Y., 2018. Google Duplex: an AI system for accomplishing real-world tasks over the phone. https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.html (accessed 13.09.2021).
  26. Maes, P., 1994. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 31-40.10.1145/176789.176792
  27. Metzinger, T., 2019. Ethics washing made in Europe. Der Tagesspiegel, https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/eu-guidelines-ethics-washing-made-in-europe/24195496.html (accessed 15.09.2020).
  28. Microsoft, https://www.microsoft.com (accessed 13.09.2021).
  29. Nguyen, T.H., Sherif, J.S., Newby, M. 2007. Strategies for successful CRM implementation. Information Management & Computer Security, 15(2), 102-115, DOI: 10.1108/0968522071074800110.1108/09685220710748001
  30. Nimavat, K., Champaneria, T., 2017. Chatbots: an overview. Types, architecture, tools and future possibilities. IJSRD – International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, 5(7), 1019-1024.
  31. Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., Murray, R.M., 2007. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems, Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(1), 215-233.10.1109/JPROC.2006.887293
  32. Project Management Institute, 2008. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Fourth edition, Newtown Square.
  33. Rowley, J., 2007. The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180.10.1177/0165551506070706
  34. Ruchi, S., Srinath, P., 2018. Big Data Platform for Enterprise Project Management Digitization Using Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/ICECA.2018.8474799
  35. Russell, S. J., Norvig, P., 2010. Artificial intelligence – A Modern Approach. third ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
  36. SAP, http://www.sap.com, (accessed 13.09.2021).
  37. Schoen, M., 2017. Hype cycle for project and portfolio management, https://www.gartner.com/doc/3772090/hype-cycle-project-portfolio-management, (accessed 13.09.2021).
  38. Skorek, N., Trojanowski, M., Wilczak, A., 2010. Studium przypadku w nauczaniu marketingu. (in) Marketing w Realiach Współczesnego Rynku. Strategie i Działania Marketingowe, PWE, Warszawa, Poland, 549-556.
  39. Spałek S., 2017, Zarządzanie projektami w erze przemysłu 4.0. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, 9, 106-112.
  40. Sullivan III, M., 2016. Statistics: Informed Decisions Using Data, fifth ed., Person, Harlow, England, ISBN-10: 0134135377.
  41. Vanhoucke, M., 2012. Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling: Baseline Scheduling. Risk Analysis and Project Control, second ed., Springer, Berlin, Germany.10.1007/978-3-642-25175-7
  42. Wachnik, B., 2016. Wdrażanie Systemów Informatycznych Wspomagających Zarządzanie, PWE, Warszawa, Poland.
  43. Wachnik, B. 2020a. Możliwość wykorzystywania botów zintergrowanych z Dynamics 365 BC/NAV, Alna, https://alna.pl/pl/blog/mozliwosc-wykorzystania-botow-zintegrowanych-z-dynamics-365-bc-nav (accessed 13.09.2021).
  44. Wachnik, B., 2020b. Luka Informacyjna w Przedsięwzięciach Informatycznych. Problemy i Rozwiązania, PWE, Warszawa, Poland.
  45. Walker, W.E., Marchau, V.A.W.J., Swanson, D., 2010. Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive policies: Introduction to section 2. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Elsevier, 77, 917-923.10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.004
  46. Ziółkowski A., Orłowski C., 2007, Concept of the agent system for the information technology evaluation. Information systems architecture and technology: information systems and computer communication networks, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław, Poland, 61-69.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2022.28.07 | Journal eISSN: 2353-7779 | Journal ISSN: 2353-5156
Language: English
Page range: 56 - 63
Submitted on: Oct 8, 2021
Accepted on: Nov 26, 2021
Published on: Feb 12, 2022
Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Bartosz Wachnik, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.