Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Identifying the source of the problem by using implemented the FAHP method in the selected quality management techniques Cover

Identifying the source of the problem by using implemented the FAHP method in the selected quality management techniques

Production Engineering Archives
Volume 26 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
By: Dominika Siwiec and  Andrzej Pacana  
Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. Babak, D.R., Turan, E.E., 2012. Selection of academic staff using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy proces (fahp): a pilot study. Tehnički vjesnik, 19(4), 923–929.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Bhanu, C.B., Amit, K.G., 2019. Sensitivity analysis of fuzzy-analytic hierarchical process (FAHP) decisionmaking model in selection of underground metal mining method. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 18, 8–17.10.1016/j.jsm.2018.10.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Chang, Y., Dong, S., 2017. Study on post evaluation of high-speed railway based on FAHP and Matlab simulation calculation. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette, 24(6), 1749–1758.10.17559/TV-20170319012219
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Faran, A., Kemal, K., 2019. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A performance analysis of various algorithms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 362, 110–128.10.1016/j.fss.2018.08.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Ghunaim, H., Dichter, J., 2019. Applying the FAHP to Improve the Performance Evaluation Reliability of Software Defect Classifiers. IEEE ACCESS, 7, 62794–62804.10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915964
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Jalal, M. P., Noorzai, E., Roushan, T.Y., 2019. Root Cause Analysis of the Most Frequent Claims in the Building Industry through the SCoP3E Ishikawa Diagram. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11(2).10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000289
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Kiani, M., Hosseini, S. H., Taji, M. et al., 2019. Risk assessment of blasting operations in open pit mines using fahp method. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 13(3), 76–86.10.33271/mining13.03.076
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Ligus, M., 2017. Evaluation of Economic, Social and Environmental Effects of Low-Emission Energy Technologies Development in Poland: A Multi-Criteria Analysis with Application of a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Energies, 10(10).10.3390/en10101550
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Lira, L.H., Hirai, F.E., Oliveira, M. et al., 2017. Use of the Ishikawa diagram in a case-control analysis to assess the causes of a diffuse lamellar keratitis outbreak. Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia, 80(5), 281–284.10.5935/0004-2749.2017006929160536
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Mir, S. A., Padma, T., 2016. Evaluation and prioritization of rice production practices and constraints under temperate climatic conditions using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(4).10.5424/sjar/2016144-8699
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Mochammad, S.D.P., Septi, A., Fuziah and Aris, G., 2018. Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Determine the Quality of Gemstones. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 1–6.10.1155/2018/9094380
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Pacana, A., Czerwińska, K., Siwiec, D., 2018. Narzędzia i metody zarządzania jakością, Oficyna Wydawnicza Stowarzyszenia Menedżerów Jakości i Produkcji, Częstochowa.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., Bednárowá, L., 2019. Analysis of the incompatibility of the product with fluorescent method. Metalurgija, 58 (3–4), 337–340.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., Bednárowá, L., Hajduová, Z., 2019. Wybrane metody zarządzania jakością stosowane do oceny druku etykiet. Przemysł Chemiczny, 98(1), 110–112.10.15199/62.2019.1.17
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Radionovs, A., Užga-Rebrovs, O., 2016. Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Ecological Risk Assessment. Information Technology and Management Science, 19, 16–22.10.1515/itms-2016-0005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Siwiec, D., Bednárowá, L., Pacana, A., Zawada, M., Rusko, M., 2019. Wspomaganie decyzji w procesie doboru penetrantów fluorescencyjnych do przemysłowych badań nieniszczących. Przemysł Chemiczny, 98(10), 1594–1596.10.15199/62.2019.10.12
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Yulian, F., Nadifatul Q., Arif, S. F., Dahlan, A., 2018. Decision Support System for Islamic Couple Selection Using Fuzzy–AHP and WSM Method Based Web. MATEC Web of Conferences, 197.10.1051/matecconf/201819715009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2020.26.02 | Journal eISSN: 2353-7779 | Journal ISSN: 2353-5156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 10
Submitted on: Jan 8, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 31, 2020
Published on: Apr 13, 2020
Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Ishikawa diagram,
FAHP,
5Why,
incompatibility,
quality management
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Business management, other,
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Production technology,
Process engineering and industrial engineering,
Materials sciences,
Materials sciences, other

© 2020 Dominika Siwiec, Andrzej Pacana, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)Next article