References
- Aiston, S. J., & Jung, J. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: An international comparison. Gender and Education, 27(3), 205–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1024617
- Akca, S., & Akbulut, M. (2018). Predatory journals in Turkey: An investigation through Beall’s list. Bilgi Dünyasi, 19(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2018.695
- Altbach, P. G., Yudkevich, M., & Rumbley, L. E. (2015). Academic inbreeding: Local challenge, global problem. Acia Pacific Education Review, 16, 317–330. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9391-8
- Andersen, L. B., & Pallesen, T. (2008). “Not just for the money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 28–47. http://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887889
- Andras, P. (2011). Research: metrics, quality, and management implications. Research Evaluation, 20(2), 90–116. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876265
- Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189
- Baum, C. F. (2008). Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions. Stata Journal, 8(2), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0800800212
- Bedeian, A. G., Van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman III, H. H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309312
- Besancenot, D., Huynh, K. V., & Faria, J. R. (2012). Search and research: The influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. Theory and Decision, 73, 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7
- Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton University Press.
- Braxton, J. M., & Del Favero, M. (2002). Evaluating scholarship performance: Traditional and emergent assessment templates. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.43
- Brinn, T., & Jones, M. J. (2008). The composition of editorial boards in accounting: A UK perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810842304
- Brogaard, J., Engelberg, J., & Parsons, C. A. (2014). Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations. Journal of Financial Economics, 111, 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jfineco.2013.10.006
- Cao, C., Baas, J., Wagner, C.S., & Jonkers, K. (2020). Returning scientists and the emergence of China’s science system. Science and Public Policy, 47(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz056
- Chavarro, D., Rafols, I., & Tang, P. (2018). To what extent is inclusion in the Web of Science an indicator of journal ‘quality’? Research Evaluation, 27(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy001
- Christopher, J. (2021). The raw truth about paper mills. FEBS Letters, 595(13), 1751–1757. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.14143
- Csomós, G. (2024). Mapping the geography of editors-in-chief. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0002
- Dawson, D., Morales, E., McKiernan, E. C., Schimanski, L. A., Niles, M. T., & Alperin, J. P. (2022). The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure. PLOS One, 17(4), e0265506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265506
- Demir, S. B. (2018). Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? Journal of Informetrics, 12, 1296–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008
- DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
- Ductor, L., & Visser, B. (2022). When a co-author joins an editorial board. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 200, 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.014
- Floyd, S. W., Schroeder, D. M., & Finn, D. A. (1994). Only if I’m first author: Conflict over credit in management scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 734–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/256709
- Gasparyan, A. Y. (2013). Selecting your editorial board: Maintaining standards. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28(7), 972–973. https://doi.org/10.3346%2Fjkms.2013.28.7.972
- Grancay, M., Vveinhardt, J., & Sumilo, E. (2017). Publish or perish: How Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000-2015. Scientometrics, 111, 1813–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2332-z
- Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
- Hames, I. (2001). Editorial boards: Realizing their potential. Learned Publishing, 14, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315101753141347
- Hardin, W. G., Liano, K., Chan, K. C., & Fok, R. C. W. (2008). Finance editorial board membership and research productivity. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31, 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0067-2
- Harvey, C. (2013). Reflections on editing the Journal of Finance, 2006-2012. (Working Paper, July 10, 2015). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2191787
- Heckman, J. J., & Moktan, S. (2020). The tyranny of the top five. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 419–470. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191574
- Hermanowicz, J. C. (2013). The culture of mediocrity. Minerva, 51, 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9231-0
- Hewlin, P. F. (2003). And the award for the best actor goes to... : Facades of conformity in organisational settings. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040752
- Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457380
- Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
- Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, D., Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
- Hladchenko, M., & Moed, H. F. (2021). The effect of publication traditions and requirements in research assessment and funding policies upon the use of national journals in 28 post-socialist countries. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101190
- Hodgson, G. M., & Rothman, H. (1999). The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly? The Economic Journal, 109(453), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00407
- Horta, H. (2013). Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effect on research information exchange and scientific output: New insights for academic based research. Higher Education, 65(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9559-7
- Horta, H. (2022). Academic inbreeding: Academic oligarchy, effects, and barriers to change. Minerva, 60, 593–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09469-6
- Horta, H., Meoli, M., & Santos, J. M. (2022). Academic inbreeding and choice of strategic research approaches. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(1), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12328
- Horta, H., Veloso, F., & Grediaga, R. (2010). Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Science, 56(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1109
- Jonkers, T., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1971-x
- Karadag, E. (2021). Academic (dis)qualification of Turkish rectors: Their career paths, H-index, and the number of articles and citations. Higher Education, 81, 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00542-1
- Karadag, E., & Ciftci, S.K. (2022). Deepening the effects of the academic inbreeding: Its impact on individual and institutional research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 63, 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09670-8
- Kaufman, G. G. (1984). Rankings of finance departments by faculty representation on editorial boards of professional journals: A note. Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03902.x
- Klemencic, M., & Zgaga, P. (2015). Slovenia: The slow decline of academic inbreeding. In M. Yudkevich, G. P. Altbach, & L. E. Rumbley (Eds.), Academic inbreeding and mobility in higher education: Global perspectives (pp. 156–181). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Korytkowski, P., & Kulcyzcki, E. (2019). Examining how country-level science policy shapes publication patterns: The case of Poland. Scientometrics, 119, 1519–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03092-1
- Koys, D. J. (2008). Judging academic qualifications, professional qualifications, and participation of faculty using AACSB guidelines. Journal of Education for Business, 83(4), 207–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.4.207-213
- Kulczycki, E. (2017). Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland. Research Evaluation, 26(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw023
- Kulikowski, K., Przytula, S., & Sulkowski, L. (2023). When publication metrics become the fetish: The research evaluation systems’ relationship with academic work engagement and burnout. Research Evaluation, 32(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac032
- Kuzhabekova, A., & Ruby, A. (2018). Raising research productivity in a post-Soviet higher education system: A case from Central Asia. European Education, 50(3), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2018.1444942
- Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1994). Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. Journal of Political Economy, 102(1), 194–203. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261927
- Lariviere, V., Macaluso, B., Archambault, E., & Gingras, Y. (2010). Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications, and citations. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X492495
- Lindsey, D. (1976). Distinction, achievement, and editorial board membership. American Psychologist, 31(11), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.31.11.799
- Lone, F. A., & Hussain, M. (2017). Gender variations in research productivity: Insights from scholarly research. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1608. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1608/
- Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., & McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review, 58(5), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096282
- Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
- Lowe, D. J., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2009). Scholarly achievement and accounting editorial board membership. Journal of Accounting Education, 27(4), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jaccedu.2010.07.004
- Lu, X., & Zhang, W. (2015). The reversed brain drain: A mixed-method study of the reversed migration of the Chinese overseas scientists. Science, Technology and Society, 20(3), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721815597127
- Lutmar, C., & Reingewertz, Y. (2021). Academic in-group bias in the top five economics journals. Scientometrics, 126, 9543–9556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04174-9
- Lutter, M., & Schröder, M. (2016). Who becomes a tenured professor, and why? Panel data evidence from German sociology, 1980-2013. Research Policy, 45, 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.019
- Luty, J., Arokiadass, S. M. R., Easow, J. M., & Anapreddy, J. R. (2009). Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(3), 200–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.026740
- Ma, L., & Ladisch, M. (2019). Evaluation complacency or evaluation inertia? A study of evaluative metrics and research practices in Irish universities. Research Evaluation, 28(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz008
- Macfarlane, B. (2007). Defining and rewarding academic citizenship: The implications for university promotion policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 261–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600800701457863
- Macfarlane, B., & Jefferson, A. E. (2022). The closed academy? Guild power and academic social class. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12305
- Maddi, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2024). Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in PLOS ONE and the challenges of appropriate attribution. Journal of Data and Information Science, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0015
- Mani, J., Makarević, J., Juengel, E., Ackermann, H., Nelson, K., Bartsch, G., Blaheta, R. A. (2013). I publish in I edit? Do editorial board members preferentially publish their own scientific work? PLOS One, 8(12), e83709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083709
- Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2001). Good editorial practice: Editors as educators. Croatian Medical Journal, 42(2), 113–120.
- Mayer, S. J., & Rathmann, J. M. K. (2018). How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics, 117, 1663–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1
- Merton, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 265-278). University of Chicago Press.
- Müller, M., Cowan, R., & Barnard, H. (2018). On the value of foreign PhDs in the developing world: Training versus selection effects in the case of South Africa. Research Policy, 47(5), 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.013
- Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2
- Nederhof, A. J., Zwaan, R. A., De Bruin, R. E., & Dekker, P. J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the Humanities and the Social and Behavioral Sciences: A comparative study. Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017063
- Nielsen, M. W., & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. PNAS, 118(7), e2012208118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118
- Önder, C., & Erdil, S. E. (2015). Divergent behaviors of actors under common institutional expectations: University-, departmental-, and individual-level predictors of scientific publication productivity of academics (In Turkish: Ayni kurumsal beklentilere tabi aktörlerin farklilaşan davranişlari: Öğretim üyelerinin bilimsel yayin üretkenliklerinin üniversite, bölüm ve birey düzeyindeki yordayicilari). METU Studies in Development (In Trukish: ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi), 42(3), 481–519.
- Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455
- Persson, O., Glanzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60, 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d
- Petersen, J., Hattke, F., & Vogel, R. (2017). Editorial governance and journal impact: A study of management and business journals. Scientometrics, 112, 1593–1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2434-7
- Petzold, K., & Netz, N. (2023). How do signals of academic performance vary across disciplines? Evidence from a survey experiment among university professors in Germany. Soziale Welt, forthcoming.
- PLOS Medicine Editors (2006). The impact factor game. PLOS Medicine, 3(6), e291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291
- Pontika, N., Klebel, T., Correia, A., Metzler, H., Knoth, P., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2022). Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(4) 888–911. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00224
- Rijcke, S., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use-a literature review. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038
- Sarigöl, E., Garcia, D., Scholtes, I., & Schweitzer, F. (2017). Quantifying the effect of editor-author relations on manuscript handling times. Scientometrics, 113(1), 609–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2309-y
- Sasvari, P., Bakacsi, G., & Urbanovics, A. (2022). Scientific career tracks and publication performance – relationships discovered in the Hungarian academic promotion system. Heliyon, 8, e09159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09159
- Scheidegger, F., Briviba, A., & Frey, B. S. (2023). Behind the curtains of academic publishing: Strategic responses of economists and business scholars. Scientometrics, 128, 4765–4790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04772-9
- Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Malighetti, P. (2019). Self-citations as a strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions. Research Policy, 48(2), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004
- Seeber, M., Klemencic, M., Meoli, M., & Sin, C. (2023). Publishing review reports to reveal and preserve the quality and fairness of the peer review process. European Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2192549
- Seglen, P. (1998). Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia, 69(3), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809000920
- Sharma, P. (2016). The job of a journal editor. Family Business Review, 29(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516655901
- Smith, R. (2006a). The trouble with medical journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1258%2Fjrsm.99.3.115
- Smith, R. (2006b). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society and Medicine, 99(4), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1258%2Fjrsm.99.4.178
- Tahamtan, I., Afshar, A. S., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107, 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
- Taylor, S. W., Fender, B. F., & Burke, K. G. (2006). Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: The opportunity costs of teaching and service. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 846–859. https://doi.org/10.2307/20111856
- Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003901018634
- Tutuncu, L. (2023a). All-pervading insider bias alters review time in Turkish university journals. Scientometrics, 128, 3743–3791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04724-3
- Tutuncu, L. (2023b). Editorial board publication strategy and acceptance rates in Turkish national journals. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(4), 49–83. https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0019
- Tutuncu, L. (2024). Gatekeepers or gatecrashers? The inside connection in editorial board publications of Turkish national journals. Scientometrics, 129, 957–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04905-0
- Tutuncu, L., & Seeber, M. (2024). The importance of international and national publications for promotion and the impact of recruitment policies. Working paper. Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit
- Tutuncu, L., Yucedogru, R., & Sarisoy, I. (2022). Academic favoritism at work: Insider bias in Turkish national journals. Scientometrics, 127, 2547–2576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04355-0
- Ünal, A. F. (2017). Competing institutional logics in the higher education of Turkey: Diversity in academic performance criteria and its effect on academic productivity ( In Turkish: Türkiye yükseköğretim alaninda rakip kurumsal mantiklar: Akademik performans kriterlerinde çeşitlilik ve yayin üretkenliği üzerine etkisi). Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 50(4), 83–114.
- Üsdiken, B., & Wasti, S. A. (2009). Preaching, teaching and researching at the periphery: Academic management literature in Turkey, 1970-1999. Organization Studies, 30(10), 1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609337952
- Velema, T.A. (2012). The contingent nature of brain gain and brain circulation: Their foreign context and the impact of return scientists on the scientific community in their country of origin. Scientometrics, 93, 893–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0751-4
- Walker, J. T., Salter, A., Fontinha, R., & Salandra, R. (2019). The impact of journal re-grading on perception of ranking systems: Exploring the case of the Academic Journal Guide and Business and Management scholars in the UK. Research Evaluation, 28(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz010
- Walters, W. H. (2015). Do editorial board members in library and information science publish disproportionately in the journals for which they serve as board members? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 46(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.46.4.03
- Weiser, C. J. (1997). Faculty scholarship and productivity expectations — An administrator’s perspective. HortScience, 32(1), 37–39. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.32.1.37
- Woolston, C. (2020). University drops impact factor. Nature, 595, 462. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01759-5
- Wu D., Lu, X., Li, J., & Li, J. (2020). Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field. Scientometrics, 124, 1579–1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03505-6
- Xu, S., An, M., & An, X. (2021). Do scientific publications by editorial board members have shorter publication delays and then higher influence? Scientometrics, 126, 6697–6713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04067-x
- Yoon, A. H. (2013). Editorial bias in legal academia. Journal of Legal Analysis, 5(2), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lat005
- Zdenek, R. (2018). Editorial board self-publishing rates in Czech Economic journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9922-2
- Winclawska, B. M. (1996). Polish Sociology Citation Index (principles for creation and the first results). Scientometrics, 35, 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016909