References
- Aristodemou, L., & Tietze, F. (2018). Citations as a measure of technological impact: A review of forward citation-based measures. World Patent Information, 53, 39–44. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2018.05.001
- Atallah, G., & Rodriguez, G. (2006). Indirect patent citations. Scientometrics, 67(3), 437–465. doi:10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.7
- Bartkowski, B., Theesfeld, I., Pirscher, F., & Timaeus, J. (2018). Snipping around for food: Economic, ethical and policy implications of CRISPR/Cas genome editing. Geoforum, 96, 172–180. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.07.017
- Belardo, M. B., & de Camargo, K. R. (2018). Biomedical knowledge and health policies: Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome and Fibromyalgia. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 23(9), 3085–3094. doi:10.1590/1413-81232018239.22742016
- Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217-233. doi:10.1002/asi.22803
- Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Marx, W. (2016). Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? Scientometrics, 109(3), 1477–1495. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y
- Campbell, D., Struck, B., Tippett, C., & Roberge, G. (2017, Oct 16-20). Impact of multidisciplinary research on innovation [Conference presentation]. 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI), Wuhan Univ, Wuhan, PEOPLES R CHINA.
- Dance, A. (2013). Impact: Pack a punch. Nature, 502(7471), 398.
- Didegah, F., Bowman, T. D., & Holmberg, K. (2018). On the Differences Between Citations and Altmetrics: An Investigation of Factors Driving Altmetrics Versus Citations for Finnish Articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(6), 832–843. doi:10.1002/asi.23934
- Dietz, J. S., & Rogers, J. D. (2012). Meanings and Policy Implications of “Transformative Research”: Frontiers, Hot Science, Evolution, and Investment Risk. Minerva, 50(1), 21–44. doi:10.1007/s11024-012-9190-x
- Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). (2022). Defining impact. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/
- Fragkiadaki, E., & Evangelidis, G. (2014). Review of the indirect citations paradigm: theory and practice of the assessment of papers, authors and journals. Scientometrics, 99(2), 261–288. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1175-5
- Fragkiadaki, E., Evangelidis, G., Samaras, N., & Dervos, D. A. (2011). f-Value: measuring an article’s scientific impact. Scientometrics, 86(3), 671–686. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0302-9
- Fujigaki, Y. (1998). Filling the gap between discussions on science and scientists’ everyday activities: applying the autopoiesis system theory to scientific knowledge. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 37(1), 5–22. doi:10.1177/053901898037001001
- Herzog, C., Hook, D., & Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 387–395. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00020
- Heydari, S., Shekofteh, M., & Kazerani, M. (2019). Relationship between Altmetrics and Citations: A Study on the Highly Cited Research Papers. Desidoc Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(4), 169–174. doi:10.14429/djlit.39.4.14204
- Hu, X. J., & Rousseau, R. (2016). Scientific influence is not always visible: The phenomenon of under-cited influential publications. Journal of Infometrics, 10(4), 1079–1091. doi:10.1016/j. joi.2016.10.002
- Hu, X. J., & Rousseau, R. (2018). A new approach to explore the knowledge transition path in the evolution of science & technology: From the biology of restriction enzymes to their application in biotechnology. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 842–857. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.004
- Hu, X. J., Rousseau, R., & Chen, J. (2011). On the definition of forward and backward citation generations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.004
- Hu, X. J., Rousseau, R., & Chen, J. (2012). A new approach for measuring the value of patents based on structural indicators for ego patent citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9), 1834–1842. doi:10.1002/asi.22632
- Hollingsworth, J. R. (2008). Scientific discoveries: An institutionalist and path-dependent perspective. Biomedical and Health Research-Commission of the European Communities Then IOS Press, 72, 317.
- Huang, Z. H., Zong, Q. J., & Ji, X. R. (2022). The associations between scientific collaborations of LIS research and its policy impact. Scientometrics, 127(11), 6453–6470. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04532-1
- Jones, T. H., & Hanney, S. (2016). Tracing the indirect societal impacts of biomedical research: development and piloting of a technique based on citations. Scientometrics, 107(3), 975–1003. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1895-4
- Ke, Q. (2020). Technological impact of biomedical research: The role of basicness and novelty. Research Policy, 49(7), 15. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104071
- Ke, Q. (2020). An analysis of the evolution of science-technology linkage in biomedicine. Journal of Informetrics, 14(4), 13. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101074
- Ke, Q. (2023). Interdisciplinary research and technological impact: evidence from biomedicine. Scientometrics, 128(4), 2035–2077. doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04662-0
- Kim, G., & Bae, J. (2017). A novel approach to forecast promising technology through patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 228–237. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.023
- Koshland, D. E. (2007). The cha-cha-cha theory of scientific discovery. Science, 317(5839), 761-762. doi:10.1126/science.1147166
- Lavis, J. N., Ross, S. E., Hurley, J. E., Hohenadel, J. M., Stoddart, G. L., & Abelson, W. J. (2002). Examining the Role of Health Services Research in Public Policymaking. Milbank Quarterly, 80(1), 125–154.
- Ledford, H. (2015). CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature, 522(7554), 20–24. doi:10.1038/522020a
- Lewison, G. (2004). James Bond and citations to his books. Scientometrics, 59(3), 311–320. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018536.84255.b1
- Li, D., Azoulay, P., & Sampat, B. N. (2017). The applied value of public investments in biomedical research. Science, 356(6333), 78–81. doi:10.1126/science.aal0010
- Li, X., Rousseau, R., Liang, L. M., Xi, F. J., Lu, Y. S., Yuan, Y. F., & Hu, X. J. (2022). Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research? Scientometrics, 127(4), 2105–2122. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04290-0
- Liu, Y. X., & Rousseau, R. (2014). Citation analysis and the development of science: A case study using articles by some Nobel prize winners. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 281–289. doi:10.1002/asi.22978
- Martin, B. R. (2011). The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘impact agenda’: are we creating a Frankenstein monster? Research Evaluation, 20(3), 247–254. doi:10.3152/095820211x13118583635693
- McMillan, G. S., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. L. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1), 1–8. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00030-x
- Mertens, D. M. (2021). Transformative Research Methods to Increase Social Impact for Vulnerable Groups and Cultural Minorities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 9. doi:10.1177/16094069211051563
- Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: A ‘contributions’ approach. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 405–419. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv016
- Mostert, S. P., Ellenbroek, S. P. H., Meijer, I., van Ark, G., & Klasen, E. C. (2010). Societal output and use of research performed by health research groups. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8, 10. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-8-30
- Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research policy, 26(3), 317–330.
- Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1992). Status report: linkage between technology and science. Research policy, 21(3), 237–249.
- Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1998). Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics, 41(1-2), 51–59. doi:10.1007/bf02457966
- National Science Board. (2007). Enhancing Support of Transformative Research at the National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2007/tr_report.pdf.
- Newson, R., Rychetnik, L., King, L., Milat, A., & Bauman, A. (2018). Does citation matter? Research citation in policy documents as an indicator of research impact - an Australian obesity policy case-study. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16, 12. doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0326-9
- Olmos-Penuela, J., Castro-Martinez, E., & D’Este, P. (2014). Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with nonacademic agents. Research Policy, 43(4), 696–706. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.004
- Petroni, G., & Venturini, K. (2023). Understanding technological spillovers: The case of main astrophysics European missions. Acta Astronautica, 204, 443–449. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.01.022
- Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science Overlay Maps: A New Tool for Research Policy and Library Management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887. doi:10.1002/asi.21368
- Rousseau, R. (1987). The Gozinto theorem: Using citations to determine influences on a scientific publication. Scientometrics, 11(3-4), 217–229.
- Rousseau, R. (2011, Jul 04-07). Algebraic structures in the ego article citation network [Conference presentation]. 13th Conference of the International-Society-for-Scientometrics-and-Informetrics (ISSI), Durban, South Africa.
- Rousseau, R., Egghe, L., & Guns, R. (2018). Becoming metric-wise: A bibliometric guide for researchers. Chandos Publishing.
- Strasser, T., de Kraker, J., & Kemp, R. (2020). Three Dimensions of Transformative Impact and Capacity: A Conceptual Framework Applied in Social Innovation Practice. Sustainability, 12(11), 40. doi:10.3390/su12114742
- Thelwall, M. (2016). Does astronomy research become too dated for the public? Wikipedia citations to astronomy and astrophysics journal articles 1996-2014. Profesional De La Informacion, 25(6), 893–900. doi:10.3145/epi.2016.nov.06
- Venturini, K., & Verbano, C. (2014). A systematic review of the Space technology transfer literature: Research synthesis and emerging gaps. Space Policy, 30(2), 98–114. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.04.003
- Veugelers, R., & Wang, J. (2019). Scientific novelty and technological impact. Research Policy, 48(6), 1362–1372. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.019
- Winnink, J. J., Tijssen, R. J. W., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2019). Searching for new breakthroughs in science: How effective are computerised detection algorithms? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 673–686. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.018
- Wuestman, M., Hoekman, J., & Frenken, K. (2020). A typology of scientific breakthroughs. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1203–1222. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00079
- Yin, Y., Gao, J., Jones, B. F., & Wang, D. S. (2021). Coevolution of policy and science during the pandemic. Science, 371(6525), 128–130. doi:10.1126/science.abe3084
- Zhang, L., Sun, B. B., Shu, F., & Huang, Y. (2022). Comparing paper level classifications across different methods and systems: an investigation of Nature publications. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7633–7651. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04352-3