Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in PLOS ONE and the challenges of appropriate attribution Cover

Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in PLOS ONE and the challenges of appropriate attribution

Open Access
|May 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Data extraction, cleaning, preparation and validation.
Data extraction, cleaning, preparation and validation.

Figure 2.

Three levels of potential inappropriate authorship.
Three levels of potential inappropriate authorship.

Figure 3.

Number of publications by country/region in PLOS ONE (01/2018-06/2023).
Number of publications by country/region in PLOS ONE (01/2018-06/2023).

Figure 4.

Potential inappropriate authorship concentration index by country/region.
Potential inappropriate authorship concentration index by country/region.

Figure 5.

Description of affiliation types presented in Table 5. Source: https://ror.readme.io/docs/ror-data-structure
Description of affiliation types presented in Table 5. Source: https://ror.readme.io/docs/ror-data-structure

CRediT criteria based on whether they are sufficient on their own for authorship or not_

Contributor roleRole definitionAuthorship eligibility
ConceptualizationIdeas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims.Yes
Data CurationManagement activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later reuse.Yes
Formal AnalysisApplication of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.Yes
InvestigationConducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection.Yes
MethodologyDevelopment or design of methodology; creation of modelsYes
SoftwareProgramming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.Yes
ValidationVerification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs.Yes
VisualizationPreparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation.Yes
Writing – Original Draft PreparationCreation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation).Yes
Writing – Review & EditingPreparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision – including pre- or post-publication stages.Yes
Funding AcquisitionAcquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication.No
Project AdministrationManagement and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.No
ResourcesProvision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools.No
SupervisionOversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.No

Number of DOI-based papers that fall into categories 1-3 of potential inappropriate authorship_

Authorship typeNot meet authorship criteriaPotential authorship by resourcesPotential APC ringCount# by type% by type
Appropriate authorshipNoNoNo74,34674,34690.86%
YesNoNo4849
NoYesNo2008
Inappropriate authorshipYesYesNo58574779.14%
NoNoYes21
YesNoYes14
Total 81,82381,823100.00%

Median total works count and citations number by author, by authorship type_

Authorship typeTotal works count by author (median)Total number of citations received by author (median)
Potential APC ring1041594
Not meet authorship criteria911316
Potential authorship by resources58849
Authorship meets the criteria defined by PLOS ONE38481

Specialization index in inappropriate authorship by affiliation type_

Affiliation typePotential APC ringPotential authorship by resourcesNot meet authorship criteria
Other2.970.670.52
Company2.061.540.99
Nonprofit1.581.000.69
Facility1.221.340.94
Education1.010.870.99
Healthcare0.981.201.18
Unknown0.391.170.96
Government0.001.171.05
Archive0.001.160.48

Number of authors according to types of inappropriate authorship_

Authorship type# by type# by group%% by group
APC ring46 0.01%
Authorship by resources5 08714,0220.93%2.56%
Not meet authorship criteria8 889 1.63%
Authorship meets the criteria defined by PLOS ONE532,858532,85897.44%97.44%
Total546,880546,880100.00%100.00%
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 88 - 115
Submitted on: Jan 30, 2024
Accepted on: May 20, 2024
Published on: May 31, 2024
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Abdelghani Maddi, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.