Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in PLOS ONE and the challenges of appropriate attribution

Maddi, Abdelghani; Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.

doi:10.2478/jdis-2024-0015

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of authorship attributions in scientific publications, focusing on the fairness and precision of individual contributions within academic works.

Design/methodology/approach

The study analyzes 81,823 publications from the journal PLOS ONE, covering the period from January 2018 to June 2023. It examines the authorship attributions within these publications to try and determine the prevalence of inappropriate authorship. It also investigates the demographic and professional profiles of affected authors, exploring trends and potential factors contributing to inaccuracies in authorship.

Findings

Surprisingly, 9.14% of articles feature at least one author with inappropriate authorship, affecting over 14,000 individuals (2.56% of the sample). Inappropriate authorship is more concentrated in Asia, Africa, and specific European countries like Italy. Established researchers with significant publication records and those affiliated with companies or nonprofits show higher instances of potential monetary authorship.

Research limitations

Our findings are based on contributions as declared by the authors, which implies a degree of trust in their transparency. However, this reliance on self-reporting may introduce biases or inaccuracies into the dataset. Further research could employ additional verification methods to enhance the reliability of the findings.

Practical implications

These findings have significant implications for journal publishers, highlighting the necessity for robust control mechanisms to ensure the integrity of authorship attributions. Moreover, researchers must exercise discernment in determining when to acknowledge a contributor and when to include them in the author list. Addressing these issues is crucial for maintaining the credibility and fairness of academic publications.

Originality/value

This study contributes to an understanding of critical issues within academic authorship, shedding light on the prevalence and impact of inappropriate authorship attributions. By calling for a nuanced approach to ensure accurate credit is given where it is due, the study underscores the importance of upholding ethical standards in scholarly publishing.

References

Abalkina, A. (2023). Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: evidence from a Russia-based paper mill. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1574
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Abalkina, A., & Bishop, D. (2023). Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology. Meta-Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2022.3422
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ali, M. J. (2021). No room for ambiguity: the concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 69(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2221_20
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Allen, L., O’Connell, A., & Kiermer, V. (2019). How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1210
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baumgartner, H. A., Alessandroni, N., Byers-Heinlein, K., Frank, M. C., Hamlin, J. K., Soderstrom, M., Voelkel, J. G., Willer, R., Yuen, F., & Coles, N. A. (2023). How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations. Royal Society Open Science, 10(6), 230235. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230235
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bernardi, K., Lyons, N. B., Huang, L., Holihan, J. L., Olavarria, O. A., Martin, A. C., Milton, A. N., Loor, M. M., Zheng, F., Tyson, J. E., Ko, T. C., & Liang, M. K. (2020). Gender disparity in authorship of peer-reviewed medical publications. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 360(5), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2019.11.005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brand, R. A. (2012). Further thoughts on authorship: gift authorship. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 470(10), 2926–2929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2504-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dusdal, J., & Powell, J. J. W. (2021) Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: a sociology of science case study. Science and Public Policy, 48(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab010
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hoekman, J., & Rake, B. (2024). Geography of authorship: how geography shapes authorship attribution in big team science. Research Policy, 53(2), 104927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104927
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0244611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244611
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kerr, R. L., de Vreese, C., Logan, R. A., Steiner, L., Pearson, G. S., & Pierson, C. A. (2018). Authorship transparency in an era of accountability. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(4), 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018802805
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Khalifa, A. A. (2022). Losing young researchers in the authorship battle, under-reported casualties. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 20, 100735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100735
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kwiek, M. (2020). Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource-poor system. Scientometrics, 124(1), 57–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03460-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2015). Guest authors or ghost inventors? Inventorship and authorship attribution in academic science. Evaluation Review, 39(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X13517234
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2023). Hegemony and inequality in global science: problems of the center-periphery model. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1086/722760
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Misra, D. P., Ravindran, V., & Agarwal, V. (2018). Integrity of authorship and peer review practices: challenges and opportunities for improvement. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(46), e287. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e287
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morton, B., Vercueil, A., Masekela, R., Heinz, E., Reimer, L., Saleh, S., Kalinga, C., Seekles, M., Biccard, B., Chakaya, J., Abimbola, S., Obasi, A., & Oriyo, N. (2022), Consensus statement on measures to promote equitable authorship in the publication of research from international partnerships. Anaesthesia, 77(3), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15597
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ni, C., Smith, E., Yuan, H., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2021). The gendered nature of authorship. Science Advances, 7(36), eabe4639. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe4639
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., Kriegeskorte, N., Milham, M. P., Poldrack, R. A., Poline, J.-B., Proal, E., Thirion, B., Van Essen, D. C., White, T., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sandler, J. C., & Russell, B. L. (2005). Faculty-student collaborations: ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics & Behavior, 15(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Savchenko, E., & Rosenfeld, A. (2024). Authorship conflicts in academia: an international cross-discipline survey. Scientometrics (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04972-x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seeman, J. I., & House, M. C. (2015). Authorship issues and conflict in the U.S. academic chemical community. Accountability in Research, 22(6), 346–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2015.1047707
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sismondo, S. (2020). Ghost-Managing and Gaming Pharmaceutical Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0012
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, E., & Williams-Jones, B. (2012). Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, E., Williams-Jones, B., Master, Z., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., Paul-Hus, A., Shi, M., & Resnik, D. B. (2020). Misconduct and misbehavior related to authorship disagreements in collaborative science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 1967–1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit. Online Information Review, 45(6), 1116–1130. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2020-0219
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2023). How are authors’ contributions verified in the ICMJE model? Plant Cell Reports, 42(9), 1529–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-023-03022-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2024). The conceptual ‘APC ring’: Is there a risk of APC-driven guest authorship, and is a change in the culture of the APC needed? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, (in press, DOI not yet assigned).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2016). Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Rivera, H. (2021). Spousal and kinship co-authorship should be declared to avoid conflicts of interest. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 18(3), 379–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10123-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Tsigaris, P., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2023). Acknowledgments in scientific papers. Publishing Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-023-09955-z
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whetstone, D., & Moulaison-Sandy, H. (2020). Quantifying authorship: a comparison of authorship rubrics from five disciplines. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e277. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.277
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article