References
- Alam, S. & Wilson, L. (2023). Perspectives from a publishing ethics and research integrity team for required improvements. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0018
- Audisio, K., Robinson, N. B., Soletti, G. J., Cancelli, G., Dimagli, A., Spadaccio, C., Olaria, R. P., Chadow, D., Rahouma, M., Demetres, M., Tam, D. Y., Benedetto, U., Girardi, L. N., Kurlansky, P., Fremes, S. E., and Gaudino, M. (2022). A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature. International Journal of Cardiology, 349, 109–114.
- Bar-Ilan, J. & Halevi, G. (2018). Temporal characteristics of retracted articles. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1771–1783.
- Brainard, J. (2018). Rethinking retractions. Science, 362(6413), 390–393.
- Cokol, M., lossifov, I., Rodriguez-Esteban, R., & Rzhetsky, A. (2007). How many scientific papers should be retracted? Embo Reports, 8(5), 422–423.
- Davis, M. S., Riske-Morris, M., & Diaz, S. R. (2007). Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 395–414.
- Fanelli, D. (2013). Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PloS Medicine, 10(12): e1001563.
- Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), 17028–17033.
- Furman, J. L., Jensen, K., & Murray, F. (2012). Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Research Policy, 41(2), 276–290.
- Furuse, Y. (2024). Characteristics of retracted research papers before and during the covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Medicine, 10:1288014.
- Gilbert, F. & Denison, A. (2003). Research misconduct. Clinical Radiology, 58(7), 499–504.
- Grieneisen, M. L. & Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLOS ONE, 7(10): e44118.
- Gross, C. (2016). Scientific misconduct. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 693–711.
- He, T. (2013). Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010. Sciento- metrics, 96(2), 555–561.
- Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., & Reinhart, M. (2017). The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Current Sociology, 65(6), 814–845.
- Hsiao, T.-K. & Schneider, J. (2022). Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(4), 1144–1169.
- Li, M. & Shen, Z. (2024). Science map of academic misconduct. The Innovation, 5(2):100593.
- Lu, S. F., Jin, G. Z., Uzzi, B., and Jones, B. (2013). The retraction penalty: Evidence from the web of science. Scientific Reports, 3:3146.
- Madlock-Brown, C. R. & Eichmann, D. (2015). The (lack of) impact of retraction on citation networks. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 127–137.
- Mena, J. D., Ndoye, M., Cohen, A. J., Kamal, P., & Breyer, B. N. (2019). The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct. BJU International, 124(1), 174–179.
- Mongeon, P. & Lariviere, V. (2016). Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors’ careers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 535–542.
- Mousavi, T. & Abdollahi, M. (2020). A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences. Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 28(1), 359–369.
- Palla, I. A., Singson, M., and Thiyagarajan, S. (2023). Systematic examination of post- and precitation of Indian-authored retracted papers. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 638–650.
- Peng, H., Romero, D. M., & Horvat, E.-A. (2022). Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(25): e2119086119.
- Rong, L. Q., Audisio, K., Rahouma, M., Soletti, G. J., Cancelli, G., & Gaudino, M. (2022). A systematic review of retractions in the field of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 36(2), 403–411.
- Rosenkrantz, A. B. (2016). Retracted publications within radiology journals. American Journal of Roentgenology, 206(2), 231–235.
- Sharma, K. (2021). Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8363–8374.
- Sharma, P., Sharma, B., Reza, A., Inampudi, K. K., & Dhamija, R. K. (2023). A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 597.
- Steen, R. G. (2011). Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(4), 249–253.
- Steen, R. G. and Hamer, R. M. (2014). A case-control comparison of retracted and non-retracted clinical trials: Can retraction be predicted? Publications, 2(1), 27–37.
- Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74.
- Teixeira da Silva, J. & Nazarovets, S.(2023).Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills”. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(2) 118–125. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0009
- Tong, S., Shen, Z., Huang, T., & Yang, L. (2022). Fighting against academic mis-conduct: What can scientometricians do? Journal of Data and Information Science, 7(2), 4–5.
- Trikalinos, N. A., Evangelou, E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2008). Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(5), 464–470.
- Van Noorden, R. (2023). More than 10, 000 research papers were retracted in 2023-a new record. Nature, 624(7992), 479–481.
- Wilson, J. K. K. (2023). The right to retract and the danger of retractions. Society, 60(2), 167–175.