Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A comparative study on characteristics of retracted publications across different open access levels Cover

A comparative study on characteristics of retracted publications across different open access levels

By: Er-Te Zheng and  Hui-Zhen Fu  
Open Access
|May 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Trends of number of retracted publications (a) and retraction rate of different OA levels (b). The horizontal axis is the publication year.
Trends of number of retracted publications (a) and retraction rate of different OA levels (b). The horizontal axis is the publication year.

Figure 2.

Average retraction rate of different OA levels. Note: *p = 0.05; **p = 0.01; ***p=0.001; the same below.
Average retraction rate of different OA levels. Note: *p = 0.05; **p = 0.01; ***p=0.001; the same below.

Figure 3.

Retraction rate of reasons for retraction across different OA levels.
Retraction rate of reasons for retraction across different OA levels.

Figure 4.

Retraction time lag (a) and survival rate curve (b) of different OA levels.
Retraction time lag (a) and survival rate curve (b) of different OA levels.

Figure 5.

Survival rate curve of different reasons for retraction.
Survival rate curve of different reasons for retraction.

Figure A1.

Proportion of retracted publications in different JIF quartiles.
Proportion of retracted publications in different JIF quartiles.

Figure A2.

Retraction time lag (a) and survival rate curve (b) of different OA levels (Q1 articles).
Retraction time lag (a) and survival rate curve (b) of different OA levels (Q1 articles).

Category of reasons for retraction_

Major reasonOriginal reasons identified by Retraction Watch database
Error and concernError in image/data/text/results and/or conclusions/methods/materials (general)/ cell lines/tissues/analyses; Concerns/issues about image/data/results/referencing/ attributions; Contamination of reagents/materials (general)/cell lines/tissues; Unreliable data/image/results; Results not reproducible
PlagiarismPlagiarism of text/image/data/article; Euphemisms for plagiarism
Self-plagiarismSelf-plagiarism of text/image/data/article; Euphemisms for self-plagiarism; Salami slicing
Falsification and manipulationFalsification/fabrication of results/image/data; Manipulation of results/images; Hoax publication; Paper mill; Fake peer review; Sabotage of materials/methods
Authorship issuesForged authorship; Concerns/Issues about authorship
Ethical issuesLegal reasons/legal threats; Civil/criminal proceedings; Ethical violations; Lack of ethical approval; informed/patient consent-none/retracted; Infringement of patient privacy; Lack of balance/bias issues; Conflict of interest; Copyright claims
OthersOther reasons for retraction
Not available/ lack of information

The proportion and retraction time lag of different reasons for retraction_

Reasons for retraction% of reasons of retraction
Gold OAGreen OAnon-OATotalRetraction time lag (year)
Self-plagiarism25%21%23%23%3.75
Falsification and manipulation16%25%19%18%3.67
Ethical issues8%6%8%8%2.92
Error and concern36%42%32%34%2.90
Authorship issues5%1%6%5%2.44
Plagiarism10%5%13%12%2.40
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 40
Submitted on: Aug 20, 2023
Accepted on: Feb 21, 2024
Published on: May 27, 2024
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Er-Te Zheng, Hui-Zhen Fu, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.