References
- Ali, A. and Nazim, M. (2023). Does funded research have a greater scholarly impact? A study of funded and non-funded research published in high-impact library and information science journals. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-03-2023-0102
- Ardito L., Coccia M., Messeni Petruzzelli A. (2021). Technological exaptation and crisis management: Evidence from COVID-19 outbreaks. R&D Management, 51(4), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12455
- Bjørk R. (2019). The age at which Nobel Prize research is conducted. Scientometrics, 119, 931-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03065-4
- Bjørk R. (2020). The journals in physics that publish Nobel Prize research. Scientometrics, 122, 817-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03312-8
- Boyack K.W. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101: 5192-5199.
- Boyack K.W., Klavans R., Börner K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.
- Clements J. C. (2017). Open access articles receive more citations in hybrid marine ecology journals. Facets, 2(1), 1-14.
- Coccia M. (2005). A Scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. Scientometrics, 65(3), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1
- Coccia M. (2008). Measuring scientific performance of public research units for strategic change. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.04.001
- Coccia M. (2008a). Spatial mobility of knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity: analysis and measurement of the impact within the geoeconomic space. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9032-4
- Coccia M. (2009). Bureaucratization in public research institutions, Minerva, A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 47(1), 31-50. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41821483
- Coccia M. (2014). Converging scientific fields and new technological paradigms as main drivers of the division of scientific labour in drug discovery process: the effects on strategic management of the R&D corporate change. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(7), 733-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.882501
- Coccia M. (2018). General properties of the evolution of research fields: a scientometric study of human microbiome, evolutionary robotics and astrobiology. Scientometrics, 117(2), 1265-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8
- Coccia M. (2018a). Motivation and theory of self-determination: Some management implications in organizations. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 5(4), 223-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v5i4.1792
- Coccia M. (2018b). Classification of innovation considering technological interaction. Journal of Economics Bibliography-J. Econ. Bib., 5(2), 76-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v5i2.1650
- Coccia M. (2019). Why do nations produce science advances and new technology? Technology in Society, 59, November, n. 101124, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.007
- Coccia M. (2019a). The Role of Superpowers in Conflict Development and Resolutions. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3709-1
- Coccia M. (2019b). Comparative Institutional Changes. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1277-1
- Coccia M. (2019c). Destructive technologies as driving forces of new technological cycles for industrial and corporate change. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 6(4), 252-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jest.v6i4.1973
- Coccia M. (2019d). Metabolism of public research organizations: how do laboratories consume state subsidies? Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 19(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0421-y
- Coccia M. (2019e). Intrinsic and extrinsic incentives to support motivation and performance of public organizations. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 6(1), 20-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v6i1.1795
- Coccia M. (2020). The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics. Scientometrics, 124, 451-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y
- Coccia M. (2020a). Fishbone diagram for technological analysis and foresight. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 14, Nos. 2/3/4, 225-247. DOI: 10.1504/IJFIP.2020.111221
- Coccia M. (2020b). Destructive Technologies for Industrial and Corporate Change. In: Farazmand A. (eds), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3972-1
- Coccia M. (2021). Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: the COVID-19 research. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9405-9429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04172-x
- Coccia M. (2022). Probability of discoveries between research fields to explain scientific and technological change. Technology in Society, vol. 68, February, n. 101874, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101874
- Coccia M., Bozeman B. (2016). Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2027-x
- Coccia M., Falavigna G., Manello A. (2015). The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: a scientometric analysis. Scientometrics, 102(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1427-z
- Coccia M., Ghazinoori S., Roshani S. (2023). Evolutionary Pathways of Ecosystem Literature in Organization and Management Studies. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2499460/v1
- Coccia M., Rolfo S. (2008). Strategic change of public research units in their scientific activity. Technovation, 28(8), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.005
- Coccia M., Wang L. (2016). Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(8), 2057-2061. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510820113
- Coccia M., Roshani S. (2024). General laws of funding for scientific citations: how citations change in funded and unfunded research between basic and applied sciences. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0001
- Coccia M., Mosleh M., Roshani S., (2024a). Evolution of Quantum Computing: Theoretical and Innovation Management Implications for Emerging Quantum Industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 2270-2280, DOI (identifier) 10.1109/TEM.2022.3175633
- Coccia M. (2008b). New organizational behaviour of public research institutions: Lessons learned from Italian case study. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2(4), 402-419. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJB
- Coccia M. (2010). Spatial patterns of technology transfer and measurement of its friction in the geo-economic space. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 9(3), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTTC.2010.030214
- Coccia M. (2018c). Competition between basic and applied research in the organizational behaviour of public research labs. Journal of Economics Library, 5(2), 118-133, http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jel.v5i2.1652
- Coccia M. (2019f). Theories of Self-determination. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3710-1
- Coccia M. (2020c). How does science advance? Theories of the evolution of science. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 7(3), 153-180, http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jest.v7i3.2111IR.2008.018589
- Cole S., Cole J. (1967). Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32, 377-390.
- Dewett T., Denisi A.S. (2004). Exploring scholarly reputation: It’s more than just productivity. Scientometrics, 60, 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027796.55585.61
- Fanelli D., Glänzel W. (2013). Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS One, 8(6), e66938.
- Fortunato S., Bergstrom C. T., Börner K., Evans J. A., Helbing D., Milojević, S., Petersen A. M., Radicchi F., Sinatra R., Uzzi B., Vespignani A., Waltman L., Wang D., Barabási A.-L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6378). DOI: 10.1126/science.aao0185
- Frame J.D., Carpenter M.P. (1979). International research collaboration. Soc Stud Sci, 9(4), 481-497.
- Heinze T., Fuchs J.E. (2022). National and organizational patterns of Nobel laureate careers in physiology/medicine, physics, and chemistry. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04250-0
- Heyard, R., Hottenrott H. (2021). The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF research Grants. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-021-00891-x
- Hollingsworth J.R., (2006). A path-dependent perspective on institutional and organizational factors shaping major scientific discoveries. In: Hage, J., Meeus, M. (Eds.), Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change. Oxford University Press, UK.
- Hu X. J, Rousseau R. (2016). Nobel Prize winners: Igniting or sparking foundational publications? Scientometrics, 110, 1053-1063 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2205-x
- Huang, Y. R., Tian, C. L., Ma, Y. F. (2023). Practical operation and theoretical basis of difference-in-difference regression in science of science: The comparative trial on the scientific performance of Nobel laureates versus their coauthors. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(1), 29-46
- Kademani B., Kalyane V., Kumar V. et al. (2005). Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status. Scientometrics, 62, 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0019-3
- Katz J. S. (2016). What is a complex innovation system? PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0156150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156150.
- Kitcher P. (2001). Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford Univ Press, New York.
- Klavans R., Boyack K.W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 60, 455-476.
- Kosmulski M. (2020). Nobel laureates are not hot. Scientometrics, 123, 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03378-9
- Leguendre P., Leguendre L. (2012). Numerical ecology. London: Elsevier B. V. 3rd ed., vol. 24.
- Lewison, G., Dawson, G. (1998). The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research. Scientometrics, 41, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457963
- Li E.Y., Liao C.H., Yen H.R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42(9), 1515-1530.
- Li X., Rousseau R., Liang, L. M. et al. (2022). Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research? Scientometrics, 127, 2105-2122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04290-0
- Ma C. F., Su C., Yuan, J. P. et al. (2012). Papers written by Nobel Prize winners in physics before they won the prize: an analysis of their language and journal of publication. Scientometrics, 93, 1151-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0748-z
- Ma, L. (2021). The steering effects of citations and metrics. Journal of Documentation, 77(2), 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2020-0093
- Mabe M. A, Amin M. (2002). Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: Author- reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing. Aslib Proceedings, 54(3), 149-157.
- MacLean M., Davies C., Lewison G., Anderson J.(1998). Evaluating the research activity and impact of funding agencies. Research Evaluation, 7(1), 7-16.
- Makino J. (1998). Productivity of research groups-relation between citation analysis and reputation within research communities. Scientometrics, 43, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458398
- Mannion, R., Marini, G., Street, A. (2008). Implementing payment by results in the English NHS: Changing incentives and the role of information. Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, 22(1), 79-88.
- Merton R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79(4), 606-623.
- Morillo F. (2020). Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact. Scientometrics, 125, 689-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03652-w
- Mosleh M., Roshani S., Coccia M. (2022). Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science. Scientometrics, 127, 1931-1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1
- Pagliaro M., Coccia M. (2021). How self-determination of scholars outclasses shrinking public research lab budgets, supporting scientific production: a case study and R&D management implications. Heliyon, 7(1), e05998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05998
- Pao M.L. (1991). On the relationship of funding and research publications. Scientometrics, 20, 257-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018158
- Petersen A.M., Fortunato S., Pan R.K., Kaski K., Penner O., Rungi A., Riccaboni M., Stanley H.E., Pammolli F. (2014). Reputation and impact in academic careers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111(43), 15316-153
- Quinlan K. M., Kane M., Trochim W. M. K. (2008). Evaluation of large research initiatives: Outcomes, challenges, and methodological considerations. In C. L. S. Coryn & M. Scriven (Eds.), Reforming the evaluation of research. New Directions for Evaluation, 118, 61-72.
- Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2011). Measuring research excellence: Number of Nobel Prize achievements versus conventional bibliometric indicators. Journal of Documentation, 67(4), 582-600. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111145007
- Ronda-Pupo G. A., Katz J. S. (2016). The power-law relationship between citation-based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals: A scale-independent approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2565-2572. doi.org/10.1002/asi.23575.
- Ronda-Pupo G. A., Katz J. S. (2017). The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1257-1265. doi.org/10.1002/asi.23759
- Roshani S., Bagherylooieh M. R., Mosleh M., Coccia M. (2021). What is the relationship between research funding and citation-based performance? A comparative analysis between critical disciplines. Scientometrics, 126(9), 7859-7874. doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9
- Saam N.J., Reiter L. (1999). Lotka’s law reconsidered: The evolution of publication and citation distributions in scientific fields. Scientometrics, 44, 135-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457376
- Sen, B.K., Pandalai, T.A. and Karanjai, A. (1998). Ranking of scientists – a new approach. Journal of Documentation, 54(5), 622-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007184
- Simonton D.K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Rev Gen Psychol, 8(1), 59-67.
- Small H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 50(3), 799-813.
- Small H., Tseng H., Patek M. (2017). Discovering discoveries: Identifying biomedical discoveries using citation contexts. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 46-62. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.001
- Smith L.D., Best L.A., Stubbs D.A., Johnston J., Bastiani A.A. (2000). Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the sciences: A Latourian survey of inscription practices. Soc Stud Sci, 30(1), 73-94.
- Stephan P. E. (1996). The Economics of Science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1199-1235, Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2729500
- Storer N.W. (1967). The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations. Bull Med Libr Assoc, 55(1), 75-84.
- Turki H., Hadj Taieb, M.A., Ben Aouicha M. (2020). Facts to consider when analyzing the references of Nobel Prize scientific background. Scientometrics, 124, 787-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03456-y
- Urde, M. and Greyser, S.A. (2015). The Nobel Prize: the identity of a corporate heritage brand. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(4), 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-11-2014-0749
- Wang J., Shapira P. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 87(3), 563-586.
- Wang J., Shapira P. (2015). Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. PloS one, 10(2), doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117727.
- Web of Science. (2022). Web of Science, Search in: Web of Science Core Collection, http://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&SID=E5lSYgaLwJn6kp2iz2G&search_mode=GeneralSearch (Accessed 24 February 2022)
- Wen, F. F. (2019). Study on the research evolution of Nobel laureates 2018 based on self-citation network. Journal of Documentation, 75(6), 1416-1431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2019-0027
- Yan E., Wu C. J., Song M. (2018). The funding factor: A cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact. Scientometrics, 115(1), 369-384.
- Zhang, T. Y., Tan, F., Yu, C., Wu, J. X. & Xu, J. (2023). Understanding relationship between topic selection and academic performance of scientific teams based on entity popularity trend. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 75(3), 561-588. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2022-0135
- Zhao S. X., Lou W., Tan A. M., Yu S. (2018). Do funded papers attract more usage? Scientometrics, 115(1), 153-168.