Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Perspectives from a publishing ethics and research integrity team for required improvements Cover

Perspectives from a publishing ethics and research integrity team for required improvements

By: Sabina Alam and  Laura Wilson  
Open Access
|Aug 2023

References

  1. Abalkina, A. (2021). Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: evidence from a Russia-based paper mill. arXiv:2112.13322v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13322
  2. Bain, L., Ebuenyi, I. D., & Noubiap, J. J. (2022). Research and publication ethics knowledge and practices in the health and life sciences: Findings from an exploratory survey. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 23(100803).
  3. Bairi, K. E., Kadmiri, N. E., & Fourtassi, M. (2022). Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students. Accountability in Research, 1–20.
  4. Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications. MBio, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00809-16
  5. Candal-Pedreira, C., Ross, J. S., Ruano-Ravina, A., Egilman, D. S., Fernández, E., & Pérez-Ríos, M. (2022). Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study. BMJ, 379: e071517. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071517
  6. Chua, J., Lee, C. S. L., Yeo, K. P., Ali, Y., & Lim, C. H. (2022). Perception and reaction of Nanyang Technological University (NTU) researchers to different forms of research integrity education modality. BMC Medical Ethics, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00824-6
  7. COPE. (2019). Guidelines: Retraction guidelines. (n.d.). Committee on Publication Ethics. https://publicationethics.org/sites/default/files/retraction-guidelines-cope.pdf
  8. COPE & STM. (2022). Paper Mills — Research report from COPE & STM — English. https://doi.org/10.24318/jtbG8IHL
  9. Else, H. (2022). Paper-mill detector put to the test in push to stamp out fake science. Nature, 612(7940), 386–387. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04245-8
  10. Fanelli, D., Schleicher, M., Fang, F. C., Casadevall, A., & Bik, E. M. (2022). Do individual and institutional predictors of misconduct vary by country? Results of a matched-control analysis of problematic image duplications. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0255334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255334
  11. Fong, E. A., Patnayakuni, R., & Wilhite, A. (2023). Accommodating coercion: Authors, editors, and citations. Research Policy, 52(5), 104754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104754
  12. F1000 Research Publishing Policies (Date Accessed: 2023, April 20). F1000Research Data and software availability policy. F1000 Research. https://f1000research.com/about/policies#dataavail.
  13. Garfinkel S, Alam S, Baskin P, et al. (2023). Enhancing partnerships of institutions and journals to address concerns about research misconduct: recommendations from a working group of institutional research integrity officers and journal editors and publishers. JAMA Network Open, 6(6), e2320796. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20796
  14. Gopalakrishna, G., Ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0263023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023
  15. Han, S.Y., Li, K., Gao, S., Zhang, Y.Z., Yang, X.X., Li, C., Wang, Y., Li, L.Y., Zhao, Y.J., & Wang, Z.W. (2023). Research misconduct knowledge and associated factors among nurses in China: A national cross-sectional survey. Applied Nursing Research, 69: 151658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151658
  16. Koroshetz, W. J., Behrman, S., Brame, C. J., Branchaw, J., Brown, E. N., Clark, E. A., Dockterman, D., Elm, J. J., Green, K. M., Hsi, S., Kaplitt, M. G., Kolber, B. J., Kolodkin, A. L., Lipscombe, D., Macleod, M. R., McKinney, C., Munafò, M. R., Oakley, B., Olimpo, J. T., … Silberberg, S. D. (2020). Framework for advancing rigorous research. eLife, 9: e55915. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.55915
  17. Mayyas, F., & Alzoubi, K. H. (2022). Awareness and knowledge of manuscript writing and research integrity: A cross sectional survey among graduate students. Heliyon, 8(11), e11447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11447
  18. Moher, D., Bouter, L. M., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., Coriat, A., Foeger, N., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
  19. Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Du Sert, N. P., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
  20. Parker, L. S., Harriman, S. L., Lawrence, R., & Bero, L. (2022). Experts identified warning signs of fraudulent research: a qualitative study to inform a screening tool. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 151, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.006
  21. Schneider, J., Woods, N. D., Proescholdt, R., Burns, H., Howell, K. B., Campbell, M. A., Hsiao, T. K., Yip, W. Y., Fu, Y., & Arianlou, Y. (2022). Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00125-x
  22. Schroter, S., Roberts, J. A., Loder, E., Penzien, D. B., Mahadeo, S., & Houle, T. T. (2018). Biomedical authors’ awareness of publication ethics: an international survey. BMJ Open, 8(11), e021282. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021282
  23. STM Association. (2023, April 15; Date Accessed 2023, April 20). STM Integrity Hub - STM. STM. https://www.stm-assoc.org/stm-integrity-hub/
  24. Taylor and Francis Group Journals. (Date Accessed: 2023, April 20). Editorial Policies - Author Services. Taylor and Francis Group. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/editorial-policies/
  25. The Economist. (2023, February 24). There is a worrying amount of fraud in medical research. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2023/02/22/there-is-a-worrying-amount-of-fraud-in-medical-research
  26. Wager, E., & Kleinert, S. (2021). Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00109-3
  27. Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J., Da Silva Santos, L. O. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O. G., Edmunds, S. C., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 14
Submitted on: Apr 22, 2023
Accepted on: Jul 5, 2023
Published on: Aug 25, 2023
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Sabina Alam, Laura Wilson, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.