References
- Bhatt, B. (2021). A multi-perspective analysis of retractions in life sciences. Scientometrics, 126(5), 4039–4054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03907-0
- CB&R (Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals). (2022). Manuscript Submission Guidelines and Policies for Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals. https://home.liebertpub.com/publications/cancer-biotherapy-and-radiopharmaceuticals/8/for-authors. Last accessed: July 10, 2022
- COPE & STM. Paper Mills — Research report from COPE & STM — English (Version 1: June 2022). https://doi.org/10.24318/jtbG8IHL. Last accessed: March 24, 2023
- Dal-Ré, R., & Ayuso, C. (2021). For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature. Accountability in Research, 28(5), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1835479
- De Cassai, A., Geraldini, F., De Pinto, S., Carbonari, I., Cascella, M., Boscolo, A., Sella, N., Monteleone, F., Cavaliere, F., Munari, M., Garofalo, E., & Navalesi, P. (2022). Inappropriate citation of retracted articles in anesthesiology and intensive care medicine publications. Anesthesiology, 137(3), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004302
- Else, H. & Van Noorden, R. (2021). The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science. Nature, 591, 516–519. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00733-5
- Errington, T. M., Mathur, M., Soderberg, C. K., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E., & Nosek, B. A. (2021). Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. eLife, 10, e71601. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71601
- Hamilton, D. G. (2019). Continued citation of retracted radiation oncology literature – do we have a problem? International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 103(5), 1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.014
- Hsiao, T. K., & Schneider, J. (2022). Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(4), 1144–1169. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00155
- Liu, X. M., & Chen, X. T. (2021). Authors’ noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(4), 473–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24419
- Pantziarka, P., & Meheus, L. (2019). Journal retractions in oncology: a bibliometric study. Future Oncology, 15(31), 3597–3608. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0233
- Retraction Watch. (2021). Here’s what happened when a publisher looked more closely at a paper milled paper. https://retractionwatch.com/2021/10/06/heres-what-happened-when-a-publisher-looked-more-closely-at-a-paper-milled-paper/. October 6, 2021. Last accessed: March 24, 2023
- Retraction Watch. (2022). Retraction database. Version: 1.0.6.0. http://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx#?jou%3dCancer%2bBiotherapy%2band%2bRadiopharmaceuticals. Last accessed: July 10, 2022
- Rivera, H., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). Retractions, fake peer review, and paper mills. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 36(24), e165. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e165
- Sharma, K. (2021). Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8363–8374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04125-4
- Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). Paper mill-derived cancer research: The improbability of prostate cancer in women, and ovarian and breast cancer in men. Nowotwory Journal of Oncology, 71(4), 255–256. https://doi.org/10.5603/NJO.a2021.0039
- Teixeira da Silva J. A. (2022a). Issues and challenges to reproducibility of cancer research: A commentary. Future Oncology, 18(12), 1417–1422. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2021-1378
- Teixeira da Silva J. A. (2022b). A dangerous triangularization of conflicting values in academic publishing: ORCID, fake authors, and the lack of criminalization of the creators of fake elements. Epistēmēs Metron Logos, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.12681/eml.27238
- Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Vuong, Q-H. (2022). Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness. Learned Publishing, 35(2), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1409
- Tumor Biology. (2022). Author Guidelines. https://www.iospress.com/catalog/journals/tumor-biology. Last accessed: March 24, 2023
- Xu, S. X., & Hu, G. W. (2022). Non-author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross-disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction. Learned Publishing, 35(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1445
- Zhao, T. Y., Dai, T. C., Lun, Z. J., & Gao, Y. L. (2021). An analysis of recently retracted articles by authors affiliated with hospitals in mainland China. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 52(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.52.2.03