References
- Aksnes, D. W., Schneider, J. W., & Gunnarsson, M. (2012). Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 36–43.
- Bloch, C., & Schneider, J. W. (2016). Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 371–382.
- Bouabid, H. (2014). Science and technology metrics for research policy evaluation: some insights from a Moroccan experience. Scientometrics, 101(1), 899–915.
- Debackere, K., & Glänzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics, 59(2), 253–276.
- Engels, T. C., & Guns, R. (2018). The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 45–60.
- Gauffriau, M., & Larsen, P. O. (2005). Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics, 64(1), 85–93.
- Gauffriau, M. (2021). Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970–2018: A review. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(3), 932–975.
- Hagen, N. T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably–not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3), 785–793.
- Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.
- Jeon, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2018). Is the gap widening among universities? On research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system. Quality & Quantity, 52(2), 589–606.
- Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Alphabetization and the skewing of first authorship towards last names early in the alphabet. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 575–582.
- Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
- Mongeon, P., Smith, E., Joyal, B., & Larivière, V. (2017). The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship. PloS One, 12(9), e0184601.
- Nielsen, M. W. (2017). Gender consequences of a national performance-based funding model: new pieces in an old puzzle. Studies in Higher Education, 42(6), 1033–1055.
- REF2021 (2020). Guidance.
https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance-and-criteria-on-submissions/guidance/ - Sivertsen, G., Rousseau, R., & Zhang, L. (2019). Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 679–694.
- Sivertsen, G. (2018). The Norwegian model in Norway. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 2–18.
- Van Hooydonk, G. (1997). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 944–945.
- Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391.
- Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., & Hill, S., Jones, R., Kain, R., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M., Tinkler, I. V., Wouters, P., Hill, J., & Johnson, B. (2015). The Metric Tide. Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363 - Woelert, P., & McKenzie, L. (2018). Follow the money? How Australian universities replicate national performance-based funding mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 27(3), 184–195.