References
- Arun, R., Suresh, V., Madhavan, C.E.V., & Murty, M.N. (2010). On Finding the Natural Number of Topics with Latent Dirichlet Allocation: Some Observations. In M.J. Zaki, J.X. Yu, B. Ravindran, & V. Pudi (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Pt I, Proceedings (Vol. 6118, pp. 391–402). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
- Baltimore, D., Berg, P., Botchan, M., Carroll, D., Charo, R.A., Church, G., … Yamamoto, K.R. (2015). A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science, 348(6230), 36–38. doi:10.1126/science.aab1028
- Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., & Jordan, M.I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4/5), 993–1022
- Blei, D.M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the Acm, 55(4), 77–84. doi:10.1145/2133806.2133826
- Blei, D.M., & Lafferty, J.D. (2006). Dynamic topic models. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning (pp. 113–120).
- Blei, D.M., & Lafferty, J.D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17–35. doi:10.1214/07-aoas114
- Campbell, A., Cavalade, C., Haunold, C., Karanikic, P., & Piccaluga, A. (2020). Knowledge Transfer Metrics. Towards a European-wide set of harmonised indicators. EUR, 30218
- Doudna, J.A. (2020). The promise and challenge of therapeutic genome editing. Nature, 578(7794), 229–236. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1978-5
- Doudna, J.A., & Charpentier, E. (2014). The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 346(6213), 1077–+. doi:10.1126/science.1258096
- Doudna, J.A., & Gersbach, C.A. (2015). Genome editing: The end of the beginning. Genome Biology, 16. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0860-5
- Figuerola, C.G., Marco, F.J.G., & Pinto, M. (2017). Mapping the evolution of library and information science (1978–2014) using topic modeling on LISA. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1507–1535. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2432-9
- Fukuzawa, N., & Ida, T. (2016). Science linkages between scientific articles and patents for leading scientists in the life and medical sciences field: The case of Japan. Scientometrics, 106(2), 629–644. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1795-z
- Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366–382. doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.4.366.14420
- Griffiths, T.L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5228–5235. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101
- Gupta, P., & Gulati, P. (2021). Implementation and comparison of topic modeling techniques based on user reviews in e-commerce recommendations. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(5), 5055–5070. doi:10.1007/s12652-020-01956-6
- Gurwitz, D. (2014). Gene drives raise dual-use concerns. Science, 345(6200), 1010–1010. doi:10.1126/science.345.6200.1010-b
- Han, X.Y. (2020). Evolution of research topics in LIS between 1996 and 2019: An analysis based on latent Dirichlet Allocation topic model. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2561–2595. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03721-0
- Hsu, P.D., Lander, E.S., & Zhang, F. (2014). Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 157(6), 1262–1278. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010
- Hoffman, M., Bach, F., & Blei, D. (2010). Online learning for latent dirichlet allocation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 23, 856–864.
- Hu, X., & Rousseau, R. (2018). A new approach to explore the knowledge transition path in the evolution of science & technology: From the biology of restriction enzymes to their application in biotechnology. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 842–857. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.004
- Jiang, T., Liu, X.P., Zhang, C., Yin, C.A.H., & Liu, H.Z. (2021). Overview of trends in global single cell research based on bibliometric analysis and LDA model (2009–2019). Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(2), 163–178. doi:10.2478/jdis-2021-0008
- Kim, H., & Kim, J.S. (2014). A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases. Nature Reviews Genetics, 15(5), 321–334. doi:10.1038/nrg3686
- Knott, G.J., & Doudna, J.A. (2018). CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science, 361(6405), 866–869. doi:10.1126/science.aat5011
- Kushkowski, J.D., Shrader, C.B., Anderson, M.H., & White, R.E. (2020). Information flows and topic modeling in corporate governance. Journal of Documentation, 76(6), 1313–1339. doi:10.1108/jd-10-2019-0207
- Lamba, M., & Madhusudhan, M. (2019). Mapping of topics in DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, India: A study. Scientometrics, 120(2), 477–505. doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03137-5
- Ledford, H. (2015). CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature, 522(7554), 20–24. doi:10.1038/522020a
- Li, D., Azoulay, P., & Sampat, B.N. (2017). The applied value of public investments in biomedical research. Science, 356(6333), 78–81. doi:10.1126/science.aal0010
- Lo, S.C.S. (2010). Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: A case of genetic engineering research. Scientometrics, 82(1), 109–120. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0036-8
- McMillan, G.S., Narin, F., & Deeds, D.L. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1), 1–8. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00030-x
- Mendes, F.M.L., Castor, K., Monteiro, R., Mota, F.B., & Rocha, L.F.M. (2019). Mapping the lab-on-a-chip patent landscape through bibliometric techniques. World Patent Information, 58. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2019.101904
- Miyata, Y., Ishita, E., Yang, F., Yamamoto, M., Iwase, A., & Kurata, K. (2020). Knowledge structure transition in library and information science: Topic modeling and visualization. Scientometrics, 125(1), 665–687. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03657-5
- Newman, D.J., & Block, S. (2006). Probabilistic topic decomposition of an eighteenth-century American newspaper. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(6), 753–767. doi:10.1002/asi.20342
- Pickar-Oliver, A., & Gersbach, C.A. (2019). The next generation of CRISPR-Cas technologies and applications. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 20(8), 490–507. doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0131-5
- Qin, J.H., Wang, J.J., & Ye, F.Y. (2019). A metric approach to hot topics in biomedicine via keyword co-occurrence. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(4), 13–25. doi:10.2478/jdis-2019-0018
- Roder, M., Both, A., Hinneburg, A., & Assoc Comp, M. (2015). Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. New York: Assoc Computing Machinery.
- Shan B. & Li F. (2010). A survey of topic evolution based on LDA (in Chinese). Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 24(06), 43–49+68
- Sievert, C., & Shirley, K. (2014). LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. In Proceedings of the workshop on interactive language learning, visualization, and interfaces (pp. 63–70).
- Sugimoto, C.R., Li, D.F., Russell, T.G., Finlay, S.C., & Ding, Y. (2011). The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing north american library and information science dissertations using Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 185–204. doi:10.1002/asi.21435
- Suominen, A., & Toivanen, H. (2016). Map of science with topic modeling: Comparison of unsupervised learning and human-assigned subject classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2464–2476. doi:10.1002/asi.23596
- Tijssen, R.J.W. (2010). Discarding the ‘basic science/applied science’ dichotomy: A knowledge utilization triangle classification system of research journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1842–1852. doi:10.1002/asi.21366
- Tijssen, R.J.W., Buter, R.K., & van Leeuwen, T.N. (2000). Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389–412. Retrieved from
://WOS:000089449100014 - Wang, J.J., & Ye, F.Y. (2021). Probing into the interactions between papers and patents of new CRISPR/CAS9 technology: A citation comparison. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 12. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101189
- Wang, X., & McCallum, A. (2006). Topics over time: A non-markov continuous-time model of topical trends. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 424–433).
- WIPO. (2019). International patent classification (version 2019). Available at http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc
- van Raan, A.F.J. (2017a). Patent citations analysis and its value in research evaluation: A review and a new approach to map technology-relevant research. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(1), 13–50. doi:10.1515/jdis-2017-0002
- van Raan, A.F.J. (2017b). Sleeping beauties cited in patents: Is there also a dormitory of inventions? Scientometrics, 110(3), 1123–1156. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2215-8
- Yau, C.K., Porter, A., Newman, N., & Suominen, A. (2014). Clustering scientific documents with topic modeling. Scientometrics, 100(3), 767–786. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1321-8
- Zhou, H.C., Zheng, D.J., Li, Y.M., & Shen, J.W. (2019). User-opinion mining for mobile library apps in China: Exploring user improvement needs. Library Hi Tech, 37(3), 325–337. doi:10.1108/lht-05-2018-0066
- Zhou, W.Y., Yuan, Y.J., Zhang, Y.Q., & Chen, D. (2021). A decade of CRISPR gene editing in China and beyond: A scientometric landscape. Crispr Journal, 4(3), 313–320. doi:10.1089/crispr.2020.0148
- Zhu, H.C., Li, C., & Gao, C.X. (2020). Applications of CRISPR-Cas in agriculture and plant biotechnology. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 21(11), 661–677. doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00288-9