Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Causal Configuration Analysis of Payment Decision Drivers in Paid Q&A Cover

A Causal Configuration Analysis of Payment Decision Drivers in Paid Q&A

By: Wenyu Chen,  Yan Cheng and  Jia Li  
Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766.
  2. Fiss, P. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198.
  3. Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.
  4. Ghahtarani, A., Sheikhmohammady, M., & Rostami, M. (2020). The impact of social capital and social interaction on customers’ purchase intention, considering knowledge sharing in social commerce context. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(3), 191–199.
  5. Harper, F.M., Raban, D.R., Rafaeli, S., & Konstan, J.A. (2008). Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites. Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 865–874). Florence, Italy, DBLP.
  6. Hofer, M., & Aubert, V. (2013). Perceived bridging and bonding social capital on Twitter: Differentiating between followers and followees. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2134–2142.
  7. Li, J., Zhang, S., Wang, W.T., & Wang, Y.Z. (2017). Research on the influencing factors of user's online knowledge consumption behavior. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 174–179.
  8. Li, L., Lee, K.Y., & Yang, S.B. (2019). Exploring the effect of heuristic factors on the popularity of user-curated “Best places to visit” recommendations in an online travel community. Information Processing & Management, 56(4), 1391–1408.
  9. Lucassen, T., Noordzij, M.L., & Schraagen, J.M. (2011). Reference blindness: The influence of references on trust in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference Germany, 1–4.
  10. Morris, M.R. (2010). What Do People Ask Their Social Networks, and Why? A Survey Study of Status Message Q&A Behavior. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. DBLP.
  11. Natour, S.A., & Tureken, O. (2020). A comparative assessment of sentiment analysis and star ratings for consumer reviews. International Journal of Information Management, 54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102132
  12. Oyemomi, O., Liu, S., Neaga, I., Chen, H., & Nakpodia, F. (2019). How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 94, 313–319.
  13. Pappas, I.O. (2018). User experience in personalized online shopping: A fuzzy-set analysis, European Journal of Marketing, 52(7/8), 1679–1703.
  14. Pappas, I.O., Giannakos, M.N., & Sampson, D.G. (2019). Fuzzy set analysis as a means to understand users of 21st-Century learning systems: The case of mobile learning and reflections on learning analytics research, Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 646–659.
  15. Pappas, I.O., Kourouthanassis, P.E., Giannakos, M.N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2016). Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 794–803.
  16. Pappas, I.O., Papavlasopoulou, S., Mikalef, P., & Giannakos, M.N. (2020). Identifying the combinations of motivations and emotions for creating satisfied users in SNSs: An fsQCA approach. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102–128.
  17. Park, Y., El Sawy, O.A., & Fiss, P.C. (2017). The Role of Business Intelligence and Communication Technologies in Organizational Agility: A Configurational Approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(9), 648–686.
  18. Ragin, C.C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310.
  19. Ragin, C.C., & Fiss, P. (2008). Net effects versus configurations: An empirical demonstration. In C.C. Ragin (Ed.), Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy set and beyond (pp. 190–219). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  20. Ruiz-Mafe, C., Chatzipanagiotou, K., & Curras-Perez, R. (2018). The role of emotions and conflicting online reviews on consumers’ purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 89, 336–344.
  21. Shi, X., Zheng, X.B., & Yang, F. (2020). Exploring payment behavior for live courses in social Q&A communities: An information foraging perspective. Information Processing & Management, 57(4). doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102241
  22. Son, J., Lee, J., Oh, O., Lee, H.K., & Woo, J. (2020). Using a Heuristic-Systematic Model to access the Twitter user profile's impact on disaster tweet credibility. International Journal of Information Management, 54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102176
  23. Speldekamp, D., Knoben, J., & Helmhout, A.S. (2020). Clusters and firm-level innovation: A configurational analysis of agglomeration, network and institutional advantages in European aerospace. Research Policy, 49(3). doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103921
  24. Tam, K.Y., & Ho, S. (2005). Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Research, 16(3), 271–291.
  25. Todorov, A., Chaiken, S., & Henderson, M.D. (2002). The heuristic–systematic model of social information processing, in: J.P. Dillard, M. Pfau (Eds.), The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 195–212.
  26. Wirth, W., Bocking, T., Karnowski, V., Pape, T. (2010). Heuristic and Systematic Use of Search Engines. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 778–800.
  27. Woodside, A. (2014). Embrace perform model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495–2503.
  28. Yan, J., Leidner, D.E., Benbya, H., & Zou, W.F. (2019). Social capital and knowledge contribution in online user communities: One-way or two-way relationship? Decision Support Systems, 127, 113–131.
  29. Zhang, F.M., Hu, Q.F., & Fang, X.P. (2019). Why pay? An empirical study of paid-for SQA sites in China. Online Information Review, 43(7), 1302–1315.
  30. Zhang, J., Zhang, J.L., & Zhang, M.Y. (2019). From free to paid: Customer expertise and customer satisfaction on knowledge payment platforms. Decision Support Systems, 127, 113–140.
  31. Zhang, W., & Watts, S.A. (2008). Capitalizing on Content: Information Adoption in Two Online Communities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(2), 73–95.
  32. Zhang, Y., Lu, B.Z., & Zheng, H.D. (2020). Can buzzing bring business? Social interactions, network centrality and sales performance: An empirical study on business-to-business communities. Journal of Business Research, 112, 170–189.
  33. Zhao, Y.X., Peng, X.X., Liu, Z.Y., Song, S.J., & Hansen, P. (2020). Factors that affect askers’ pay intention in trilateral payment-based social Q&A platforms: From a benefit and cost perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(5), 516–528.
  34. Zhao, Y., Zhao, Y., Yuan, X.N., & Zhou, R.X. (2018). How knowledge contributor characteristics and reputation affect user payment decision in paid Q&A? An empirical analysis from the perspective of trust theory. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 31, 1–11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 162
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 9, 2021
Published on: Mar 8, 2021
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Wenyu Chen, Yan Cheng, Jia Li, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.