Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Why Open Government Data? The Case of a Swedish Municipality Cover

Why Open Government Data? The Case of a Swedish Municipality

By: Koraljka Golub and  Arwid Lund  
Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. Baack, S. (2015). Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data Society, July–December 2015, 1–11.
  2. Bergsman, L.G. (2020). Hur länge har kommunen haft sin portal för öppna data? [Personal communication].
  3. Borgman, C.L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.
  4. DIGG. (2019a). Uppdrag att öka den offentliga förvaltningens förmåga att tillgängliggöra öppna data, bedriva öppen och datadriven innovation samt använda artificiell intelligens (Dnr: 2019-139; Delrapport i regeringsuppdraget I2019/01416/DF samt I2019/01020/DF (delvis), p. 14). https://www.digg.se/4a3a84/globalassets/dokument/publicerat/publikationer/delrapportoppna-data-oppen-och-datadriven-innovation-samt-ai.pdf
  5. DIGG. (2019b). Förvaltnings- och finansieringsförslag för dataportal.se: Bilaga 2 till Delrapport avseende regeringsuppdrag rörande öppna data, öppen och datadriven innovation samt AI (Dnr: 2019-139; p. 11). Myndigheten för digital förvaltning.
  6. DIGG. (2020). Principer för att tillgängliggöra information—DIGG. DIGG - Myndighet. https://www.digg.se/utveckling-av-digital-forvaltning/sveriges-dataportal/principer#princip_6:_dokumentera_och_beskriv_information
  7. Frick, A. (2015). Öppna data: En omvärldsanalys med nulägesstatus. Internetstiftelsen.
  8. Gascó-Hernándeza, M., Martin, E.G., Reggi, L., Pyo, S., & Luna-Reyes, L.F. (2018). Promoting the use of open government data: Cases of training and engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 2(35), 233–42.
  9. Gruen, N. (2009). Engage: Getting on with government 2.0 report of the government 2.0 taskforce. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from http://www.finance.gov.au/sites/default/files/Government-20TaskforceReport.pdf?v=1
  10. Harrison, T.M., Pardo, T.A., & Cook, M. (2012). Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda. Future Internet, 4(4), 900–28.
  11. HM Treasury. (2009). Putting the frontline first: Smarter government. London: HM Government; 2009. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228889/7753.pdf
  12. Hossain, M., & Chan, C. (2016). Open data adoption in Australian government agencies: An exploratory study. In F. Burstein, H. Scheepers, & G. Deegan (Eds.), Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS) 2015. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.02500
  13. Kalin, I. (2014). Open data policy improves democracy. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 34(1), 59–70.
  14. Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Los Angeles, Ca.: SAGE.
  15. Lassinanti, J., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Ståhlbröst, A. (2014). Shaping local open data initiatives: Politics and implications. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 9(2), 17–33.
  16. Lee, G., & Hoon Kwak, Y. (2011). An open government implementation model: Moving to increased public engagement. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from http://www-07.ibm.com/events/au/smartergovernment/pdf/An_Open_Government_Implementation_Model.pdf
  17. Liljeqvist, P., Nordfeldt, A., Warnolf, A., & Holmdahl, C. (2020). Innovation genom information: Huvudbetänkande av Öppna data-utredningen (SOU 2020:55; Statens Offentliga Utredningar).
  18. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Groves, P., Farrell, D, Van Kuiken, S., & Doshi E.A. (2013). Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information. San Francisco, Ca.: The McKinsey Global Institute.
  19. Martin, E.G, Helbig, N., Birkhead, G.S. (2015). Opening health data: What do researchers want?: Early experiences with New York's open health data platform. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 21(5), 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25105279
  20. Máchová, R., Hub, M., & Lnenicka, M. (2018). Usability evaluation of open data portals: Evaluating data discoverability, accessibility, and reusability from a stakeholders’ perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2018-0026
  21. Milan, S., & Gutiérrez, M. (2015). Medios ciudadanos y big data: la emergencia del activismo de datos. Mediaciones, 14(11), 10–26.
  22. OECD. (2018). Open Government Data Report: Enhancing policy maturity for sustainable impact (OECD Digital Government Studies). OECD Publishing.
  23. OECD. (2019). Government at a Glance 2019 | en | OECD. http://www.oecd.org/gov/government-at-a-glance-22214399.htm
  24. Open Government Partnership. (2018). About OGP: Open Government Partnership. Retrieved from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/about-ogp
  25. Publications Office of the European Union. (2019). Open data maturity report 2019. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2830/073835
  26. Publications office of the European Union. (2020). Användningsfall | Europeiska Data Portalen. Användningsfall Europeiska Data Portalen. https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sv/impact-studies/use-cases
  27. Safarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity 22(1), 1–24.
  28. Shekarabi, A., & K. Aldén. (2016). Uppdrag till Riksarkivet att främja statliga myndigheters arbete med att tillgängliggöra data för vidareutnyttjande. Retrieved from https://riksarkivet.se/Media/pdf-filer/uppdrag-till-Riksarkivet_16juni2016.pdf
  29. Skellefteå Kommun, S. (2018). Kommunfakta. Kommunfakta. https://www.skelleftea.se/kommun/om-skelleftea
  30. Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives (Rep. No. 22). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  31. Växjö kommun. (2020). Växjö kommun—Öppna geografiska data. https://data-vaxjo.opendata.arcgis.com/
  32. Weerakkody, V., Kawaljeet, K., Balta, M.A., Irani, Z., & Dwivedi, Y.K. (2017). Factors influencing user acceptance of public sector big open data. Production Planning & Control, 28(11–12), 891–905.
  33. White House. (2009a). Memorandum on transparency and open government. Washington, DC: White House.
  34. White House. (2009b). Memorandum on freedom of information act. Washington, DC: White House.
  35. Zhu, X., & Freeman, M.A. (2019). An evaluation of U.S. municipal open data portals: A user interaction framework. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24081
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 120 - 138
Submitted on: Jun 15, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 2, 2020
Published on: Jan 27, 2021
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Koraljka Golub, Arwid Lund, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.