References
- Alesina, A., & Ferrara, E.L. (2000). The determinants of trust (No. w7621). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w7621
- Altayar, M.S. (2018). Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 633–643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.006
- Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
- Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
- Berelson, B. (1952). Democratic theory and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 313–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266397
- Bollen, K.A., & Paxton, P. (2000). Subjective measures of liberal democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 33(1), 58–86.
- Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 109–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/976358
- Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1430453580
- Chun, S., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15(1–2), 1–9.
- Drakos, K., Kallandranis, C., & Karidis, S. (2019). Determinants of trust in institutions in times of crisis: Survey-based evidence from the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(6), 1228–1246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12884
- Euro Area Business Cycle Dating Committee (2020) Available from: https://cepr.org/content/euro-area-business-cycle-dating-committee-announcements.
- European Parliament and Council of the EU (2003). Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/98/oj
- European Parliament and Council of the EU (2019). Directive (EU) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1024/oj
- Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550410539794
- Gonzálvez-Gallego, N., Nieto-Torrejón, L., & Pérez-Cárceles, M.C. (2020). Is open data an enabler for trust? Exploring the link and the mediating role of citizen satisfaction. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(14), 1218–1227. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1668412
- Grimmelikhuijsen, S.G. (2012). Transparency and trust. An experimental study of online disclosure and trust in government. Dissertation, Utrecht Univ.
- Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2016). Monnet's error? Economic Policy, 31(86), 247–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiw003
- Harrison, T.M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G.B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., & Pardo, T. (2012). Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, 17(2), 83–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0269
- Hix, S. (2013). What's Wrong with the Europe Union and How to Fix it. John Wiley & Sons.
- Hood, C. (2006). Transparency in historical perspective. In Transparency: The key to better governance?, Ed. Christopher Hood and David Heald, 3–23. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
- Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.692807
- Hossain, M.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., & Rana, N.P. (2016). State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce, 26(1–2), 14–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1124007
- Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Jackson, M.C. (2016). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
- Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2016). Big and open linked data (BOLD) in research, policy, and practice. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 3–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1124005
- Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
- Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
- MacCallum, R.C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
- Martin, C. (2014). Barriers to the open government data agenda: Taking a multi-level perspective. Policy & Internet, 6(3), 217–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI367
- McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002
- Meijer A. (2009). Understanding computer-mediated transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 255–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020852309104175
- Meijer, A. (2014). Government transparency in historical perspective: From the ancient regime to open data in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(3), 189–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.934837
- Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2005). What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1050–1078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005278419
- Moss, G., & Coleman, S. (2014). Deliberative manoeuvres in the digital darkness: E-democracy policy in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(3), 410–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-856X.12004
- Muller, E.N., & Jukam, T.O. (1983). Discontent and aggressive political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 13(2), 159–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400003203
- Muñoz, J., Torcal, M., & Bonet, E. (2011). Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation?. European Union Politics, 12(4), 551–574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511419250
- O’Hara, K. (2012, June). Transparency, open data and trust in government: Shaping the infosphere. In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM web science conference, 223–232.
- Open Data Watch (2019). Open data inventory 2018/2019. Methodology report. Available from: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ubPL1l_3im9bjlCVZ6W2ICAy6UAiXl1hGeA1aXImkxI/edit
- Parycek, P., Hochtl, J., & Ginner, M. (2014). Open government data implementation evaluation. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Eelectronic Commerce Research, 9(2), 80–99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200007
- Pereira, G.V., Macadar, M.A., Luciano, E.M., & Testa, M.G. (2017). Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 213–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9673-7
- Porumbescu, G.A., & Park, Y. (2014). Examining the distinctiveness of antecedents to trust in government: Evidence from South Korea. African and Asian Studies, 13(3), 315–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15692108-12341301
- Rigdon, E.E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(4), 369–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540052
- Safarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, 22(1), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160012
- Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 63–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
- Schafheitle, S., Weibel, A., Meidert, N., & Leuffen, D. (2020). The Road to Trust. A Vignette Study on the Determinants of Citizens’ Trust in the European Commission. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(2), 256–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12901
- Schedler, K., Guenduez, A.A., & Frischknecht, R. (2019). How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government. Information Polity, 24(1), 3–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180095
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
- Schumpeter, J.A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
- Smith, A., Voß, J.P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
- Thorhildur, J., Avital, M., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2013). The generative mechanisms of open government data. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Utrecht, 6–7, June.
- Ullman, J.B., & Bentler, P.M. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Handbook of Psychology, 607–634.
- Van der Meer, T.W. (2018). Economic performance and political trust. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, 599–616.
- Williams, L.J., Edwards, J.R., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2003). Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management, 29(6), 903–936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0149-2063_03_00084-9
- Wirtz, B.W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open government: Origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(5), 381–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942735
- Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557–585.
- Yu, H., & Robinson, D.G. (2011). The new ambiguity of open government. UCLA L. Rev. Discourse, 59, 178.
- Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 17–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003