References
- Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. (2011). Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 87(3), 499–514. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0352-7
- Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, 1(1). doi:10.1177/0891988714527516
- ARWU. (2018). Academic ranking of world universities. Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2018.html
- ASCB. (2016). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). Retrieved from http://www.ascb.org/dora/
- Borgman, C. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the Networked world. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67(3), 751–753.
- Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40. doi:10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
- Clarivate Analytics. (2018). InCites Indicators Handbook. Category Normalized Citation Impact. Retrieved from http://help.incites.clarivate.com/inCites2Live/8980-TRS/version/5/part/8/data/InCites-Indicators-Handbook%20-%20June%202018.pdf
- Ding, Z. Q., Ge, J. P., Wu, X. M., & Zheng, X. N. (2013). Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries. Scientometrics, 96(3), 829–844. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-0968-x
- Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471–479.
- Garfield, E. (1990). Keywords plus - ISI’s breakthrough retrieval method. 1. Expanding your searching power on current - contents on diskette. Current Contents, 32, 5–9.
- Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. doi:10.1038/520429a
- Huang, Y., Zhu, D. H., Lv, Q., Porter, A. L., Robinson, D. K. R., & Wang, X. F. (2017). Early insights on the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI): An overlay map-based bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 111(3), 2041–2057. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2349-3
- Ibrahim, B. (2018). Arab Spring’s effect on scientific productivity and research performance in Arab countries. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1555–1586. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2935-z
- James, W., Liz, A., Eleonora, B., Philip, C., Stephen, C., Steven, H., . . . , & Ben, J. (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management.
- Jia, T. (2018). China’s research works are underrepresented. Paper presented at the The 2nd International Conference on Data-driven Knowledge Discovery, Beijing.
- Kumar, A. J., & Pandit, R. (2018). Science and engineering research in India (1985–2016): Insights from two scientometric databases. Current Science, 115(3), 399–409. doi:10.18520/cs/v115/i3/399-409
- Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya Anegon, F., & Moed, H. (2009). Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: The effect of poorly cited journals in oncology. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 244–256. doi:10.1177/01655 51508098603
- Lukman, R., Krajnc, D., & Glavic, P. (2010). University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 619–628. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.015
- Moed, H., & Plume, A. (2011). The multi-dimensional research assessment matrix. Research Trends(23).
- QS. (2019). QS World University Rankings. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodology
- Rousseau, R., Egghe, L., & Guns, R. (2018). Becoming metric-wise: A bibliometric guide for researchers: Chandos-Elsevier.
- Shanghai Ranking. (2018). The best universities in China. Retrieved from http://www.zuihaodaxue.com/zuihaodaxuepaiming-methodology-2018.html
- Sivertsen, G. (2018). The Norwegian model in Norway. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3, 3–19. doi:10.2478/jdis-2018-0017
- The University of Manchester. (2015). Manchester 2020: The university of Manchester’s strategy plan. Retrieved from www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/vision/
- Thelwall, M., Kayvan, K., Paul, W., Ludo, W., Sarah de, R., Alex, R., & Thomas, F. (2015). The metric tide: Literature review (Supplementary Report to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management).
- Times Higher Education. (2019). The world university rankings. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/methodology-world-university-rankings-2019
- U.S. News. (2018). Best global universities rankings. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodology
- Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2010). Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.002
- Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
- Waltman, L., & Eck, N. (2013). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics, 96(3), 699–716. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0913-4
- Xinhuanet. (2018). The General Office of the Central Office of the Communist Party of China, the General Office of the State Council issued “Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Project, Talent and Institutional Assessment”. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm