Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Overall difference of research performance between ShanghaiTech and benchmarking institutions_
| Region | Institution | Publication | % documents in Q1 journals | % highly cited papers | % hot papers | % international collaboration | h-index | citation impact | CNCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inter- | Univ A | 19,508 | 63.50% | 3.60% | 0.20% | 69.30% | 160 | 14.7 | 2.03 |
| national | Univ B | 6,898 | 65.00% | 4.90% | 0.50% | 50.60% | 116 | 16.9 | 2.41 |
| Univ C | 19,034 | 64.80% | 5.40% | 0.40% | 51.50% | 190 | 17.8 | 2.47 | |
| Univ D | 19,834 | 62.50% | 3.60% | 0.30% | 68.60% | 156 | 13.9 | 2.01 | |
| Univ E | 22,013 | 66.00% | 5.70% | 0.50% | 55.90% | 198 | 17.9 | 2.54 | |
| Univ F | 35,249 | 64.80% | 4.70% | 0.40% | 55.60% | 221 | 17.4 | 2.39 | |
| Univ G | 14,252 | 63.30% | 2.80% | 0.20% | 66.40% | 112 | 12.5 | 1.82 | |
| Univ H | 16,885 | 65.30% | 4.40% | 0.30% | 52.90% | 165 | 17.1 | 2.15 | |
| Domestic | Univ I | 31,673 | 50.40% | 2.40% | 0.10% | 32.70% | 139 | 8.9 | 1.45 |
| Univ J | 20,278 | 52.00% | 2.30% | 0.20% | 33.00% | 128 | 9.9 | 1.42 | |
| Univ K | 27,699 | 45.90% | 1.40% | 0.10% | 31.70% | 108 | 7.2 | 1.19 | |
| Univ L | 15,927 | 48.50% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 31.30% | 102 | 9.0 | 1.24 | |
| Univ M | 19,123 | 52.10% | 2.60% | 0.10% | 30.10% | 121 | 9.7 | 1.43 | |
| Univ N | 32,958 | 47.60% | 1.60% | 0.10% | 18.30% | 123 | 7.3 | 1.21 | |
| Univ O | 2,074 | 53.10% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 41.50% | 48 | 7.6 | 1.6 | |
| SHTech-A | 1,555 | 55.00% | 3.80% | 0.10% | 41.00% | 48 | 9.0 | 1.75 | |
| SHTech-B | 660 | 52.00% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 37.30% | 27 | 5.6 | 1.58 | |
| SHTech-C | 225 | 50.70% | 5.30% | 0.00% | 46.70% | 21 | 6.2 | 1.9 |
The most frequent keywords of Molecular Biology & Genetics of benchmarking institutions and year of first appearance in ShanghaiTech’s papers_
| Frequent Keywords | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | alzheimer disease | √ | ||||
| 2 | cancer cells | √ | ||||
| 3 | cell cycle | √ | ||||
| 4 | cell lung cancer | √ | ||||
| 5 | cell proliferation | √ | ||||
| 6 | colorectal-cancer | √ | ||||
| 7 | crystal structures | √ | ||||
| 8 | dna methylation | √ | ||||
| 9 | embryonic stem-cells | √ | ||||
| 10 | epithelial-mesenchymal transition | √ | ||||
| 11 | escherichia coli | √ | ||||
| 12 | gene expression | √ | ||||
| 13 | human genome | √ | ||||
| 14 | inflammation | √ | ||||
| 15 | lung cancer | √ | ||||
| 16 | mammalian-cells | √ | ||||
| 17 | mesenchymal stem cells | √ | ||||
| 18 | molecular mechanism | √ | ||||
| 19 | mouse model | √ | ||||
| 20 | nf-kappa-b | √ | ||||
| 21 | oxidative stress | √ | ||||
| 22 | pluripotent stem-cells | √ | ||||
| 23 | progenitor cells | √ | ||||
| 24 | saccharomyces-cerevisiae | √ | ||||
| 25 | signaling pathway | √ | ||||
| 26 | skeletal muscle | √ | ||||
| 27 | stem cell | √ | ||||
| 28 | susceptibility loci | √ | ||||
| 29 | tumor growth | √ | ||||
| 30 | tumor suppression | √ | ||||
Disciplinary difference (Molecular Biology & Genetics) of research performance between ShanghaiTech and benchmarking institutions
| Region | Institution | % total publication | % documents in Q1 journals | % Highly cited papers | % Hot papers | International % H-Collaboration | index | Citation Impact | CNCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inter-national | Univ A | 12.44% | 70.90% | 3.70% | 0.41% | 74.20% | 90 | 23.5 | 2.5 |
| Univ B | 5.55% | 72.85% | 7.00% | 0.78% | 38.90% | 55 | 2.75 | 29.1 | |
| Univ C | 14.88% | 69.98% | 5.30% | 0.35% | 51.70% | 111 | 25.7 | 2.71 | |
| Univ D | 13.77% | 70.90% | 4.80% | 0.33% | 73.40% | 104 | 23.3 | 2.52 | |
| Univ E | 12.97% | 76.91% | 10.40% | 0.54% | 57.80% | 148 | 40.7 | 4.14 | |
| Univ F | 22.79% | 72.08% | 5.80% | 0.29% | 59.00% | 178 | 28.2 | 2.81 | |
| Univ G | 6.41% | 68.13% | 2.60% | 0.11% | 75.00% | 58 | 17.9 | 1.98 | |
| Univ H | 8.92% | 69.39% | 4.90% | 0.00% | 47.10% | 88 | 29.2 | 2.55 | |
| Median | 12.70% | 70.90% | 5.10% | 0.34% | 58.40% | 97 | 27 | 2.63 | |
| Domestic | Univ I | 2.83% | 61.61% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 58.40% | 53 | 15.9 | 1.84 |
| Univ J | 8.38% | 55.39% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 46.40% | 56 | 12.6 | 1.35 | |
| Univ K | 10.68% | 50.51% | 0.70% | 0.03% | 37.10% | 57 | 9.4 | 1.1 | |
| Univ L | 14.93% | 53.26% | 0.50% | 0.04% | 30.40% | 55 | 9.2 | 1.08 | |
| Univ M | 1.82% | 54.60% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 32.90% | 31 | 14.6 | 1.33 | |
| Univ N | 4.91% | 55.69% | 1.50% | 0.00% | 37.10% | 51 | 9.2 | 1.21 | |
| Univ O | 3.66% | 57.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.50% | 11 | 5.6 | 1.12 | |
| Median | 4.91% | 55.39% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 37.10% | 53 | 9.4 | 1.21 | |
| Total Median | 8.92% | 68.13% | 2.70% | 0.04% | 47.10% | 57 | 17.9 | 1.98 | |
| SHTech-A | 14.92% | 71.55% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 72.40% | 23 | 9.4 | 1.64 | |
| SHTech-B | 15.15% | 71.00% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 49.10% | 15 | 7.9 | 1.68 | |
| SHTech-C | 10.00% | 63.63% | 10.00% | 0.00% | 45.00% | 7 | 10.6 | 2.6 |
Establishment of analytic dimensions and indicators for institutional benchmarking_
| Dimension | Category | Indicator | Description | Data Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Output | Publication counts | Number of publications | Total publication of research papers | InCites, Scival |
| Research Impact | Counts of high quality | % Papers in Q1 journals | Percentage of publications in Q1 journals of JIF Quartile | InCites |
| publication | % Highly cited publications | Percentage of papers ranked in the top 1% by citations in a period of time | InCites, Scival | |
| % Hot publications | Percentage of papers ranked in the top 1‰ by citations in a period of time (article and review) | ESI | ||
| % Publications on CNS | Percentage of papers published in Cell, Nature and Science | WoS, Scopus | ||
| Impact of citation | Times cited H-index | Number of citation of total publication H-index of the set of publications | InCites, Scival WoS | |
| Citation impact | Average (mean) number of citations per year | InCites, Scival | ||
| Normalized citation impact | Citation impact that normalized for subject, year and document type | InCites, Scival | ||
| Research Topics (content analysis) | Knowledge maps | Content analysis based on research topics | Comparison of structure of maps constructed based on keywords pairing (reflect research topics) between Inst. S and benchmarking institutions | WoS, Scopus |
| Contribution to research Front | Publications as core papers in research fronts, and publishing year comparison | Number of publications as core papers in research fronts, and the comparison between publishing year of these contributed papers and average publishing year of the total core papers in each research front | ESI | |
| Research Connection | Collaboration | Main collaborators and research areas | Top collaborators with the most collaborative papers (contain co-authors), and the most collaborative research areas with each collaborator | WoS, Scopus |
Number of papers of each institution as core papers in the research front_
| No later than average publication | Earlier than average publication | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Papers in Research Front | year | year | |||
| Papers | Percentage | Papers | Percentage | ||
| Univ A | 382 | 180 | 47.12% | 42 | 10.99% |
| Univ B | 221 | 85 | 38.46% | 15 | 6.79% |
| Univ C | 570 | 319 | 55.96% | 77 | 13.51% |
| Univ D | 399 | 192 | 48.12% | 40 | 10.03% |
| Univ E | 713 | 364 | 51.05% | 65 | 9.12% |
| Univ F | 921 | 470 | 51.03% | 86 | 9.34% |
| Univ G | 260 | 123 | 47.31% | 22 | 8.46% |
| Univ H | 436 | 234 | 53.67% | 53 | 12.16% |
| Univ I | 434 | 221 | 50.92% | 47 | 10.83% |
| Univ J | 275 | 148 | 53.82% | 23 | 8.36% |
| Univ K | 213 | 104 | 48.83% | 21 | 9.86% |
| Univ L | 134 | 61 | 45.52% | 10 | 7.46% |
| Univ M | 256 | 142 | 55.47% | 26 | 10.16% |
| Univ N | 272 | 131 | 48.16% | 27 | 9.93% |
| Univ O | 27 | 6 | 22.22% | 0 | 0.00% |
| SHTech-A | 32 | 13 | 40.63% | 0 | 0.00% |