Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Connecting the Dots: Linking Centrality Measures to Peer Perceptions in Elementary School Friendship Networks Cover

Connecting the Dots: Linking Centrality Measures to Peer Perceptions in Elementary School Friendship Networks

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Adams, J. (2020). Gathering social network data. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544321486
  2. Andrews, N. C., McDowell, H., Spadafora, N., & Dane, A. V. (2022). Using social network position to understand early adolescents’ power and dominance within a school context. School Psychology (Washington, DC), 37(6), 445. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000445
  3. Bond, R. M., Chykina, V., & Jones, J. J. (2017). Social network effects on academic achievement. The Social Science Journal, 54(4), 438–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2017.06.001
  4. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
  5. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks ((2nd edition. ed.) ed.). SAGE.
  6. Brandes, U. (2008). On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation. Social Networks, 30(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.11.001
  7. Bringmann, L. F., Elmer, T., Epskamp, S., Krause, R. W., Schoch, D., Wichers, M., Wigman, J. T., & Snippe, E. (2019). What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(8), 892. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000446
  8. Cappella, E., Neal, J. W., & Sahu, N. (2012). Children’s agreement on classroom social networks: Cross-level predictors in urban elementary schools. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2012.0017
  9. Chen, J., & Chen, Z. (2008). Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika, 95(3), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asn034
  10. Cillessen, A. H., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Sociometric perspectives.
  11. Cillessen, A. H., & Marks, P. E. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. Popularity in the Peer System, 25–56.
  12. Cillessen, A. H., & Marks, P. E. (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017(157), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20206
  13. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
  14. Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., Perugini, M., Mõttus, R., Waldorp, L. J., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2015). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003
  15. Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software. Complex Systems, 1695, 1–9. NODOI
  16. De Neve, D., Bronstein, M. V., Leroy, A., Truyts, A., & Everaert, J. (2023). Emotion regulation in the classroom: A network approach to model relations among emotion regulation difficulties, engagement to learn, and relationships with peers and teachers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01678-2
  17. Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01386390
  18. Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H., & Borch, C. (2013). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1242. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030098
  19. Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 617. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000167
  20. Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
  21. Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04
  22. Foygel, R., & Drton, M. (2010). Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 23. NODOI
  23. Freeman, L. C. (2002). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Network: Critical Concepts in Sociology. Londres: Routledge, 1, 238–263.
  24. Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7
  25. Isvoranu, A. M., & Epskamp, S. (2023). Which estimation method to choose in network psychometrics? Deriving guidelines for applied researchers. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 925–946. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000439
  26. Kindermann, T. A., & Gest, S. D. (2018). The peer group: Linking conceptualizations, theories, and methods.
  27. Laursen, B., & Faur, S. (2022). What does it mean to be susceptible to influence? A brief primer on peer conformity and developmental changes that affect it. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(3), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221084103
  28. Lease, A. M., Kennedy, C. A., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00188
  29. Lindstrom, J. W. A., Lease, A. M., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2007). Peer-and self-rated correlates of a teacher rated typology of child adjustment. Psychology in the Schools, 44(6), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20249
  30. Makara, K. A. (2013). Students’ peer relationships, social and academic goals, and academic achievement: A social network analysis approach. University of Michigan.
  31. McKirahan, J., Lease, A.M., Kwon, K., Immelman, T., Morinville, C. & Oberholder, R. (March, 2022). Comparing roster versus free-recall peer nomination methods. Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence. New Orleans, Louisiana.
  32. McMillin, K. (2021). Conceptualizing social power in adolescence.
  33. Neal, J. W. (2024). Methodological moderators of average outdegree centrality: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent friendship networks. Network Science, 12(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2024.2
  34. Neal, J. W., Neal, Z. P., & Cappella, E. (2016). Seeing and being seen: Predictors of accurate perceptions about classmates’ relationships. Social Networks, 44, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.002
  35. Oldham, S., Fulcher, B., Parkes, L., Arnatkevicĭūtė, A., Suo, C., & Fornito, A. (2019). Consistency and differences between centrality measures across distinct classes of networks. Plos One, 14(7), e0220061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220061
  36. Pollman n, A., Fritz, J., Barker, E., & Fuhrmann, D. (2023). Networks of adversity in childhood and adolescence and their relationship to adult mental health. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 51(12), 1769–1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-022-00976-4
  37. Robinaugh, D. J., Millner, A. J., & McNally, R. J. (2016). Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(6), 747. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000181
  38. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. V. (2006). They’re cool: Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9507.2006.00336.x
  39. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Laursen, B. (2011). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Guilford Press.
  40. Scott, J., & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. SAGE Publications.
  41. Valente, T. W., Coronges, K., Lakon, C., & Costenbader, E. (2008). How correlated are network centrality measures? Connections (Toronto, Ont), 28(1), 16.
  42. van den Berg, Y. H., Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2020). Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research. Journal of Adolescence, 84, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010
  43. Wasserm an, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2019.058 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 14
Published on: Jun 19, 2025
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Tyler Prochnow, Samuel Keightley, Megan S. Patterson, Michele Lease, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.