Homophily vs the Generalized Other
References
- Berger, P. L. (2004). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. Anchor Books.
- Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). Secularization and pluralism. Internationales Jahrbuch für Religionssoziologie, 2, 73–81.
- Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2008). La construcción social de la realidad. (S. Zuleta, Trad.). Amorrortu.
- Borgmann, A. (2013). So who am I really? Personal identity in the age of the Internet. AI and Society, (28), 15–20.
- Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700.
- Di Paolo, E. A., & De Jaegher, H. (2022). Enactive ethics: Difference becoming participation. Topoi, 41(2), 241–256.
- Düringer, E.-M. (2021). The moral virtue of being understanding. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 24(4), 917–932.
- Esteve-Del-Valle, M. (2022). Homophily and polarization in twitter political networks: A cross-country analysis. Media and Communication, 10(2).
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948 - Floridi, L. (2015). The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press.
- Floridi, L. (2016). Faultless responsibility: On the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), 20160112.
- Floridi, L. (2017). Infraethics-on the conditions of possibility of morality. Philosophy of Technology, 30, 391–394.
- Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.
- Floridi, L. (2023). AI as agency without intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4358789 - Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media and Society, 12(3), 347–364.
- Griselda Lopez, D. (2021). A phenomenological approach to the study of social distance. Human Studies, 44, 171–200.
- Joas, H. (1997). G.H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought. In R. Meyer, Trad. (Ed.), Studies in contemporary German social thought. MIT Press.
- Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). Van Nostrand.
- Marin, L. (2022). Enactive principles for the ethics of user interactions on social media: How to overcome systematic misunderstandings through shared meaning-making. Topoi, 41(2), 425–437.
- McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, (27), 415–44.
- Mead, G. H. (1925). The genesis of the self and social control. International Journal of Ethics, 35(3), 251–277.
- Mead, G. H. (2015). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
- Pfadenhauer, M. (2016). In-between spaces. Pluralism and hybridity as elements of a new paradigm for religion in the modern age. Human Studies, 39, 147–159.
- Roszkowska, P., & Melé, D. (2021). Organizational factors in the individual ethical behaviour. The notion of the “organizational moral structure”. Humanistic Management Journal, 6(2), 187–209.
- Schütz, A. (1995). El Problema de la realidad social. (N. Miguez, Trad.). Amorrortu.
- Steets, S. (2016). What makes people tick? And what makes a society tick? And is a theory useful for inderstanding? An interview with Peter L. Berger. Human Studies, 39, 7–25.
- Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2016). Constructing public space: Global perspectives on social media and popular contestation. International Journal of Communication, 10, 226–234.
- Verbeek, P.-P. (2015). Designing the public sphere: Information technologies and the politics of mediation. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The onlife manifesto (pp. 217–227). Springer International Publishing.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_21 - Voorhoeve, A. (2011). Conversations on ethics. Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2019.037 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 56
Published on: May 18, 2024
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2024 Jose Felipe Alarcón González, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.