Framing Otherness on Twitter: gender, elections and networks
References
- Ahmed, F., & Khan, A. (2022). Topic modeling as a tool to analyze child abuse from the corpus of english newspapers in pakistan. Social Science Computer Review.
- Baden, C., & David, Y. (2018). On resonance: a study of culture-dependent reinterpretations of extremist violence in Israeli media discourse. Media, Culture & Society, 40(4), 514–534.
- Bailey, K. (2016). Women Leaders Bring Indigenous and Black Issues to Colombia Peace Table. ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 1(1), 10–18.
- Balcells, L., & Justino, P. (2014). Bridging micro and macro approaches on civil wars and political violence: issues, challenges, and the way forward. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(8), 1343–1359.
- Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–42.
- Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 57, 289–300.
- Blei, D., Ng, A. & Jordan, M. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
- Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment, 8(10), 10008.
- Casarin, R., Correa, J. C., Camargo, J. E., Dakduk, S., Ter Horst, E., & Molina, G. (2021). What makes a tweet be retweeted? A bayesian trigram analysis of tweet propagation during the 2015 Colombian political campaign. Journal of Information Science, 47(3), 297–305.
- Castillejo, A. (2016). Poética de lo otro. Una trilogía sobre la violencia, la subjetividad y la cultura. Bogotá, Universidad de Los Andes.
- Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
- Das, S., & Sarkar, S. (2022). News media mining to explore speed-crash-traffic association during covid-19. Transportation Research Record.
- DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606.
- Ditlmann, R. K., Samii, C., & Zeitzoff, T. (2017). Addressing violent intergroup conflict from the bottom up? Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 38–77.
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
- Entman, R. M., & Usher, N. (2018). Framing in a fractured democracy: impacts of digital technology on ideology, power and cascading network activation. Journal of Communication.
- Esteve Del Valle, M., & Borge, R. (2018). Leaders or brokers? potential influencers in online parliamentary networks. Policy & Internet, 10(1), 61–86.
- Esteve del Valle, M. (2022). Homophily and polarization in twitter political networks: a cross-country analysis, 10(2), 81–92.
- Fabra-Mata, J., & Mygind, J. (2019). Big data in evaluation: Experiences from using Twitter analysis to evaluate Norway’s contribution to the peace process in Colombia. Evaluation, 25(1), 6–22.
- Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
- Garcia-Trujillo, A. (2021). Peace and rural development in Colombia : the window for distributive change in negotiated transitions (Ser. Routledge studies in latin american politics). Routledge.
- Gibbons, S. (2022). Gender on the agenda: media framing of women and women of color in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Newspaper Research Journal, 43(1), 102–128.
- Goffman, I. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press, Boston.
- Guerrero, J. & Soler, S. (2020, july–dec). Representación de los indígenas en las leyes generales de educación de Colombia. Folios (52).
- Haass, F., Hartzell, C. A., & Ottmann, M. (2022). Citizens in Peace Processes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 66(9), 1547–1561.
- Hellsten, I. & Leydesdorff, L. (2020). Automated analysis of actor-topic networks on Twitter: New approaches to the analysis of socio-semantic networks. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 71(1), 3–15.
- Hellsten, I., Opthop, T. & Leydesdorff, L. (2020). N-mode network approach for socio-semantic analysis of scientific publications. Poetics, 78.
- Hernández, N., & Gualdrón, M. (2022). The dialectics of hope and critique: Reflections on Colombia’s new government. Human Geography, 0(0).
- Himelboim, I., Sweetser, K. D., Tinkham, S. F., Cameron, K., Danelo, M., & West, K. (2016). Valence-based homophily on twitter: network analysis of emotions and political talk in the 2012 presidential election. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1382–1400. information science and technology, 71(1), 3–15.
- Holmberg, K., & Hellsten, I. (2015). Gender differences in the climate change communication on twitter. Internet Research, 25(5), 811–828.
- Jabri, V. (2023). Ontology, relationality and an alternative reading of ‘difference.’ Journal of International Political Theory, 0(0).
- Jacoby, W. G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 750–767.
- Jensen (eds.). Territories of conflict: traversing Colombia through cultural studies. University of Rochester Press.
- Jiang, X., Su, M.-H., Hwang, J., Lian, R., Brauer, M., Kim, S., & Shah, D. (2021). Polarization Over Vaccination: Ideological Differences in Twitter Expression About COVID-19 Vaccine Favorability and Specific Hesitancy Concerns. Social Media + Society, 7(3).
- Johnson, C. S., Smith, P. K., & Wang, C. (2017). Sage on the Stage: Women’s Representation at an Academic Conference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(4), 493–507.
- Liendo, N., & Braithwaite, J. M. (2018). Determinants of Colombian attitudes toward the peace process. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 35(6), 622–636.
- Louis, T. (2017). Narratives of the past in history textbooks. In A. Fanta, A. Herrero-Olaizola & C. Rutter-Jensen (eds.). Territories of conflict: traversing Colombia through cultural studies. University of Rochester Press.
- McGregor, S. C., & Mourão, R. R. (2016). Talking Politics on Twitter: Gender, Elections, and Social Networks. Social Media + Society, 2(3).
- McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
- Meernik, J. (2019). Violence and Reconciliation in Colombia: The Personal and the Contextual. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 11(3), 323–347.
- Paarlberg-Kvam, K. (2017). Colombian women activists and the potential for peace. In A. Fanta, A. Herrero-Olaizola & C. Rutter-Jensen (eds.). Territories of conflict: traversing Colombia through cultural studies. University of Rochester Press.
- Reyes, A. (2022, June 22). ¿Qué significa realmente el “vivir sabroso” de Francia Márquez? Historia de una filosofía del Pacífico que ahora resuena en Colombia. CNN Latinoamérica.
- Rodríguez, M.I. (2020). Imagining peace in Colombia. Between negotiations, policies, and resisting narratives. Araucaria, 22(43), 99–117.
- Russell, C. A., Schau, H. J., & Crockett, D. (2013). Cultural Diversity in Television Narratives: Homophilization, Appropriation, and Implications for Media Advocacy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(1_suppl), 119–130.
- Sahly, A., Shao, C., & Kwon, K. H. (2019). Social Media for Political Campaigns: An Examination of Trump’s and Clinton’s Frame Building and Its Effect on Audience Engagement. Social Media + Society, 5(2
- Scarborough, W. J. (2018). Feminist Twitter and Gender Attitudes: Opportunities and Limitations to Using Twitter in the Study of Public Opinion. Socius, 4. scientific publications. Poetics, 78.
- Sievert, C., & Shirley, K. E. (2014). LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. In Paper presented at the Proceedings of the workshop on interactive language learning, Visualization, and Interface, Baltimore, MD, June 2014.
- Skillington, T. (2023). Where does the true value of a frame analysis approach lie? A Reply to van Dijk. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 288–296.
- Snow, D. A., & Vliegenthart, R. (2023). An imperious, closed sandbox? A rejoinder to Van Dijk’s critique of the framing perspective on social movement mobilization. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 297–308.
- Snow, D. A., Vliegenthart, R., & Ketelaars, P. (2019). The framing perspective on social movements: Its conceptual roots and architecture. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.). The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Wiley Blackwell, 392–410.
- Stelmach, G., & Boudet, H. (2022). Using Structural Topic Modeling to Explore the Role of Framing in Shaping the Debate on Liquefied Natural Gas Terminals in Oregon. American Behavioral Scientist, 66(9), 1204–1237.
- Van der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2018). Public Frame Building: The Role of Source Usage in Times of Crisis. Communication Research, 45(6), 956–981.
- Van Dijk, T. A. (2023). Analyzing frame analysis: A critical review of framing studies in social movement research. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 153–178.
- Weintraub, M., Steele, A., Pantoja-Barrios, S., Nygård, H. M., Dahl, M., & Binningsbø, H. M. (2023). Introducing the Mapping Attitudes, Perceptions and Support (MAPS) dataset on the Colombian peace process. Journal of Peace Research, 0(0).
- Ylä-Anttila, T., Eranti, V., & Kukkonen, A. (2022). Topic modeling for frame analysis: a study of media debates on climate change in India and USA. Global Media and Communication, 18(1), 91–112.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2019.032 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 57 - 76
Published on: May 18, 2024
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2024 Elizabeth Pinilla Duarte, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.